Milky Way Glitters Above American National Parks (PICTURES)

Milky Way

First Posted: 7/02/2012 11:55 Updated: 7/02/2012 13:00

These stunning images capture the glory of the Milky Way and are taken with just a simple digital camera.

Revealing the Earth's place in our swirling galaxy, the pictures are so precise they look as if they've been captured by a telescope.

And incredibly, photographer Royce Bair has only been turning his lens to the night's sky for the past six months.

Calling his series "Night Scapes', Royce, 36, created the erie and ghostly images by visiting some of America's most famous national parks.

"I love working in the quiet of the night, with few distractions," explained Royce.

"Most of my Night Scape photos are taken in western U.S. national parks, in the height of the tourist season.

"At night, most of these areas are deserted. I chose Grand Teton, Bryce Canyon, and Arches National Parks for for two reasons.

"One is because their land features are very recognisable, even at night. I only add subtle light painting if it increase that recognition or it enhances their features.

"The other is because they are far away from big cities, where light pollution competes with the stars."

Each image is taken using a 30 second exposure with Royce revelling in the technical challenges night sky photography brings.

"I love astronomy and looking into the heavens to see the galaxies, constellations, and nebula," said Royce.

"Each exposure is 30 seconds long because any longer than this and then the stars appear to move or streak, due to the rotation of the earth.

"I would roughly calculate that the full-frame sensor of my Canon EOS 5D Mark II is about 10 times more sensitive than your eye.

"You see the big problem in doing star photography is finding a totally dark and cloudless sky.

"It must be at least two hours after sunset, at least two hours before sunrise; and the moon must have set or be in one of its smaller crescent phases."

Inspired by the advances in digital photography over the past decade, Royce is steadily building a starry night portfolio.

"My exposures show virtually all the stars in the sky - so many, that the sky often appears gritty. The biggest revelation has been how much light pollution there is in our world today.

"So many of my admirers lament how they cannot find any places where they live to do the same type of photography.

"I've also become more aware of the heavenly cycles in our universe. In order to get these images, I have to do a lot of planning and be more aware of the cycles of the moon, planets and major constellations.

"It has given me a lot of satisfaction to open people's eyes to a whole other world that awaits them in the evening sky. You can literally have two vacations when you visit our national parks or other remote locations.

"I also hope that others will feel a greater connection to the creator of our universe and the infinite order we are a part of."

Launch Slideshow
SHARE
BACK TO ARTICLE
1 of 14
PLAY ALL
VOTE ON THIS SLIDE

ADVERTISEMENT
FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

These stunning images capture the glory of the Milky Way and are taken with just a simple digital camera. Revealing the Earth's place in our swirling galaxy, the pictures are so precise they look a...
These stunning images capture the glory of the Milky Way and are taken with just a simple digital camera. Revealing the Earth's place in our swirling galaxy, the pictures are so precise they look a...
Filed by Sara C Nelson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:22 PM on 02/09/2012
Dear Editor,

Thanks for calling attention to the wonderful dark skies we have in the American west. However, can you please put Delicate Arch back in Arches where it belongs (see caption for story photo)?

Thanks!

Arches National Park
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gx5000
Life's too short, be happy..
04:58 PM on 02/08/2012
Love these.....
05:46 PM on 02/08/2012
Love all pictures but espically like the 1st picture with the doble rust coloured rock,carefully look to rt of rock, a face,,eyes,nose.mouth and beard,???. G
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
01:30 PM on 02/08/2012
such a tranquil restful sight from a world that is a fright
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Marysdude
GySgt USMC (Retired)
01:14 PM on 02/08/2012
A great definition of insignificance...

Presidential aspirants eat your hearts out. After you movers and shakers have ruined what little is left of this world, the universe will remain, bold and beautiful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
01:29 PM on 02/08/2012
word!!!!
photo
Spock
You are completely, absolutely, illogical
12:11 PM on 02/08/2012
As big as our milky way is, it takes light 100,000 years to travel from one end to the other, our galaxy is just a tiny spec in this cosmic ocean.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
01:30 PM on 02/08/2012
a metaphor for everything
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Claudia L
Time is the seed of the Universe
07:07 PM on 02/08/2012
The first time I really saw the Milky Way like diamonds was on the Big Island. I slept out side on my blanket and watch it. I just couldn't take my eyes away. When I came home, I airbrushed my bathroom like a night sky and glued CZs all over the ceiling. People go into the bathroom and don't come out. I have to knock on the door.
photo
Spock
You are completely, absolutely, illogical
10:20 PM on 02/08/2012
The first time I saw the night sky unhindered by light pollution was at a farm in Mexico. I was 11 years old, my family was visiting relatives there. That farm had no electricity or running water. When I looked up I saw the night sky a blaze with stars. Living near Chicago I only see a few stars at night. Its a pity I can't see a star filled night sky again unless I travel a long way from home.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rita Khanna
Social liberal but fiscal conservative
12:05 PM on 02/08/2012
wow. got to get out of the city and see for myself
10:30 AM on 02/08/2012
Mother Nature displays her exquisite beauty !!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
karen lyons kalmenson
i poem/paint, sometimes, i ain't
01:30 PM on 02/08/2012
she always does, to those of open hearts and minds
09:59 AM on 02/08/2012
Royce needs to take a double vacation to Hawaii, for his second Milky way series.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
trespanieli
09:28 PM on 02/07/2012
News headline -- Milky Way Glitter Bombs National Parks!
08:35 PM on 02/07/2012
Beautiful pictures to be sure. Unfortunately the image at the top of this article is of Delicate Arch in Arches National Park, not Bryce. Leave it to HP not to fact check.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:02 PM on 02/07/2012
Get chills looking at these...what time of year can you see this best you think???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bryan broome
Welcome back my friends 2 the show that never ends
11:53 AM on 02/08/2012
Where I live the stars seem to shine brightest in the winter.
07:43 PM on 02/07/2012
Beautiful pictures!
07:29 PM on 02/07/2012
Fantastic! Makes me feel peaceful and like "things will be OK" no matter what happens to me. Thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Spalding
07:26 PM on 02/07/2012
These are great photographs which took a lot of time and patience to get but it’s very misleading to say “taken with a simple digital camera” The camera he used for these images is a full-frame professional Canon 5D Mk II of which the body alone costs about $2,600.00. The lenses he is using are most likely Canon L-series wide angle and fish-eye lenses which cost between $1,000.00 and $2,500.00. With his other equipment tripod, accessories etc. this is probably $5,000.00 to $8,000.00 worth of gear for these shoots. Also this doesn’t include the cost of Photoshop software to enhance colors, lighting and details etc. Don’t kid yourself, a “simple digital camera” did not and could not take these amazing photographs.
07:36 PM on 02/07/2012
Wow ! Obviously you were there when these pictures were taken. Only a Canon 5D Mk II could take these pictures? Incredible ! You haven't looked into these new digital cameras very well have you Mr. Smarty?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Spalding
08:03 PM on 02/07/2012
Ok Mr "Smarty Pants", try taking these photos with your iphone and blow them up to gallery size (4 ft by 6 ft) and see what they look like. These are high resolution images probably 21 megapixel and are on a professional level of quality. And by the way I do know a little bit about photography being a professional myself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank Larkin
Don't take it personal you're not that special
08:04 PM on 02/07/2012
I would roughly calculate that the full-frame sensor of my Canon EOS 5D Mark II is about 10 times more sensitive than your eye.

The above was in the article. obviously you skipped through it because the pictures were telling you more than you needed to know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Claudia L
Time is the seed of the Universe
07:10 PM on 02/08/2012
The pictures must have been exposed for a long time. Did he follow the movement of the sky some how?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
George Spalding
03:56 AM on 02/09/2012
According to the article, Mr. Bair did a tripod exposure of 30 seconds for each shot. During that time the stars do move slightly but it's hardly noticable. Because of the sensitivity of the 5D Mk II camera sensor, 30 seconds was long enough to get the required exposure.
06:14 PM on 02/07/2012
#2 and #10 the best