Care Cuts Mean Elderly Patients Suffering 'Diminished Quality Of Life', Says Health Select Committee

Elderly Care Cuts

First Posted: 08/02/2012 05:41 Updated: 08/04/2012 10:12   PA

Elderly patients are suffering a "diminished quality of life" because social care funding pressures mean services are being reduced, a powerful committee warned today.

MPs also claimed cuts in support are driving increased demands on the NHS as they called for an overhaul of the way the system is run.

In a report today, they recommended that elderly care, health and housing services are joined up to stop patients being "passed like a parcel" from one department to another.

Stephen Dorrell, chairman of the health select committee, said: "This government, like its predecessors going back to the 1960s, has stressed the importance it attaches to joined-up services.

"Growing demand, coupled with an unprecedented efficiency challenge, makes it more urgent than ever before to convert these fine words into fine deeds.

"We look to the Government to set out in its Social Care White Paper how this vital objective will be met."

The health committee suggests that failure to link up commissioning and provision across the services leads to more hospital admissions, later discharge and poorer outcomes.

But the consequences for providers are "no less stark" as the NHS will fail to meet its efficiency saving targets of 4% every year over the next four years, it added.

NHS chief executive Sir David Nicholson told the committee that salami-slicing budgets instead of integrating services would have "very serious consequences".

MPs welcomed the government's commitment of an extra £2 billion a year for social care by 2014/15 but warned "it is not sufficient to maintain adequate levels of service quality and efficiency".

They found "funding pressures" are causing reductions in service levels "which are leading to diminished quality of life for elderly people and increased demand for NHS services".

The cross-party committee also said the large bills pensioners are left with for services such as home help come as a "shock" to many.

It called on the government to accept the "principle" of a cap in costs following the recommendation last year by the Dilnot Commission for the state to step in when bills rise above £35,000 for any individual.

Dorrell added: "This report is the latest in a long line of reports which have stressed the importance of joined-up services.

"It is impossible to deliver either high quality or efficient services when the patient is passed like a parcel from one part of the system to another, without any serious attempt to look at their needs in the round.

"This obvious truth has often been repeated, but seldom acted upon.

"The funding for NHS care, social care and social housing comes from different sources.

"Our central recommendation is that the key to joined-up services is joined-up commissioning.

"We recommend that the government should place a duty on the new clinical commissioning groups and local councils to create a single commissioning process, with a single accounting officer, and a single outcomes framework for older people's health, care and housing services in their area."

Richard Humphries, senior fellow at the King's Fund health thinktank, said: "Successive governments have talked about the need to integrate health and social care but have failed to make it happen. The time for warm words and good intentions has passed - delivering integrated care must assume the same priority over the next decade as reducing waiting times was given over the last.

"The committee is right to stress that a more ambitious approach is needed to achieve this based on coordinated commissioning and pooled budgets. We think this could go a stage further by moving towards a single assessment of the funding needs of the NHS and social care in future spending reviews."

Care Services Minister Paul Burstow said: "Our ambition for the NHS and social care is a simple one - to achieve better results for people and carers.

"We know that urgent reform of the care and support system is needed.

"We will be responding to this report and the Dilnot Commission this spring, with full proposals for reform of adult social care in a White Paper and progress report on funding reform."

Sue Brown, head of public policy at the deafblind charity Sense, said: "The stories Sense hears from deafblind people, particularly around local authorities increasingly asking people to pay for services out of their own pockets or not receive any support, suggest that the committee is right when it says 'social care funding pressures are causing reductions in service levels which are causing diminished quality of life'.

"Whilst better integration of health and social care has the potential to improve the system for many people, it is essential that social care needs do not get subsumed into health care."

Dot Gibson, general secretary of the National Pensioners' Convention, said: "The problem with our social care system is that it is the Cinderella of the welfare state, experiencing years of under-funding, rationing and poor standards.

"Nearly one million older people are denied any assistance at all, many are still forced to sell their homes in order to pay for care, and the cost and quality of some treatment is shocking.

"The government's expected White Paper must seriously consider the creation of a National Care Service that can join up all the dots and offer a comprehensive system for looking after our most vulnerable pensioners."

Age UK director-general Michelle Mitchell said: "The government should act urgently on its findings and implement the Dilnot funding reforms, update social care law, and put in place the incentives the committee proposes to bring health and social care much closer together."

Jo Webber, NHS Confederation deputy policy director, said: "The committee is absolutely right that the health and social care system has to be better integrated. The starting point must be to find a long-term solution to social care funding as, without reform, the system is on the brink of collapse.

"We agree with the committee that it is unlikely the Health and Social Care Bill will genuinely encourage integration. While promotion of integration is written into the Bill, the creation of new bodies and the division of responsibilities for various services risks fragmenting care more rather than less."

Royal College of Nursing general secretary Peter Carter said: "Getting social care funding right is crucial not only for the future of the social care system but the NHS too.

"We urge the government to take on board the recommendations of the Dilnot report in the forthcoming White Paper and deliver a health and social care system that is fit for the future."

David Rogers, chairman of the Local Government Association's community wellbeing board, said: "This report highlights yet again the urgent need for the Government to come to grips with the rapidly growing demand for social care and the rising cost of delivering it. The system is already underfunded and problems are being compounded by severe cuts to council budgets."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Elderly patients are suffering a "diminished quality of life" because social care funding pressures mean services are being reduced, a powerful committee warned today. MPs also claimed cuts in supp...
Elderly patients are suffering a "diminished quality of life" because social care funding pressures mean services are being reduced, a powerful committee warned today. MPs also claimed cuts in supp...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
15:47 on 08/02/2012
Since the days when God was a boy, the vulnerable and the poor have always suffered from cuts in whatever social care was relevant at the time.

This should not be, and need not be the case, in a modern (?) civilised society.

A lot of comment suggesting the existence of International Aid is somehow to blame for this phenomenon - it isn't.

Social service, health, pensions & defence budgets comprise over 80% of public spending.
International Aid comprises less than 1%.

Our military spending is second only per capita to that of the United States, who in turn, spend more on armaments than all the rest of humanity put together.

Having said that, significant saving can be made in the defence budget - without compromising national security - to adequately fund, support and nurture the elderly.

After all, it is the elderly who have paid their way (most of them, anyway), brought up children, made sacrifices so that others could benefit, so it's only fair and right that we - as a civilised country - recognise their contribution and provide support in our turn.

Deciding not to replace Trident, for example, would avoid spending around £190bn, which would provide comprehensive care for the elderly & an awful lot of extra cash for countless other purposes too.

Eliminating International Aid, by contrast, would provide around £50 p.a. per pensioner...
16:27 on 08/02/2012
It was estimated back in the 1980's that a fortnight's expenditure on armaments could provide the whole world with clean water, a home and education, so you are very right. If the world harvest were equally shared, there is enough food for us all to have three times our need. It's been that way for many years now. The problem is that we have not even started to create a civilised society. In a civilised society, you can tell your children they are safe to go our and play in the woods. In a civilised society, a woman can walk home alone at night without being in fear. In a civilised society, we do not leave people sleeping under cardboard boxes on the Embankment. In a civilised society, we do not leave helpless children, discarded and uncared for, hungry and miserable in lost orphanages. Civilised people get together and do something about all that. You may notice that governments don't. When the uncivilised rule the civilised...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
13:43 on 08/02/2012
Compare the Welfare cap at £26.000 to a pensioners income and ask where the fairness is in that.
13:32 on 08/02/2012
Where's my comment disappeared too?
13:45 on 08/02/2012
I suffer the same problem sir, on far too many occasions. I think a country like America, who boasts of their worldwide concerns for democracy and human rights, shoot themselves in the foot with this ` Huffpost`. I know that it will cost AOL, dearly in the UK. And they speak of Russia and China.!
13:29 on 08/02/2012
Where is my comment? I tried to edit now its gone. Typical Huffpost.
13:47 on 08/02/2012
I try again . I suffer the same problems as you sir, , but I doubt if you will be informed.
13:02 on 08/02/2012
Reducing services for our elderly when they need care after a lifetime of working /paying taxes /abiding our laws etc etc.. This coalition needs the savings so they can afford to increase International Aid and send billions overseas to corrupt governments who hold the UK in contempt. Its enough to make you goddam weep.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
13:09 on 08/02/2012
...do us all a favour - please change the record... we've heard this argument so often..

Not everything since the Big Bang can be blamed on the civilised action of a civilised nation full of civilised people of sending International Aid, which is less than 1% of GDP in this still well-off hopefully still civilised country...
13:24 on 08/02/2012
In a civilized country.. you look after your own FIRST.. and when thats sorted look after others and thats who really need aid... not India, Pakistan etc etc. Change the record... yeah.. its been on so long cos sucessive governments have treated their own people in such a disgusting fashion. Or maybe your brains on the dark side of the moon, you must be a Cleggs gofer.
13:48 on 08/02/2012
I totally agree . !
12:59 on 08/02/2012
wheres my post gone huff, did I say something too near the truth ?
11:47 on 08/02/2012
It's all going to turn out fine... We will have new committees set up in every NHS area to sort out the problem...More jobs for the boys.... Put the entire NHS back as it was before Thatcher and her accountant friends got greedy claws into it.. It worked well up to her tenure in No10.
10:58 on 08/02/2012
we can do this though http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1357056/Britains-1bn-aid-India-nation-3-times-billionaires-have.html

this country really is mental!
10:55 on 08/02/2012
I find it appauling that this government are pushing hundreds of millions onto India to help tackle their poverty. That is money from the British tax payer, so why isn't it being spent on the poverty and services in this country.It's about time our government started looking after our own istead of the rest of the world
11:22 on 08/02/2012
I find it disgusting this country send aid to countries who then send us their brand of hatred in the form of terrorists who kill and maim the people who have helped them. Talk about bitting the hand that feeds you.
12:57 on 08/02/2012
exactly right. bang on, but we must still keep sending billions to Idia (who have told us they dont want it) and Pakistan, and I think Hague might be promising a few million to Somalia, (where the pirates attacking British and other ships are) and yet our old people who have given their all to this country serving in the war, and paying taxes all their lives are pushed to the bottom of the "care" list, What a legacy this government will be leaving,, they should hang their heads in shame But Hey, they are ok with their obscene salaries and mega exes to fiddle, dont give a toss about joe bloggs
13:18 on 08/02/2012
I dont think we have any Indian terrorists in the world. They are usually muslim and India dont seem to like muslims and as far as I know never have. If you said Pakistan then thats a different story. Dont forget we are a rich country and there are many millions of children in absolute poverty wondering where their next meal will come from. We can argue all day about birth control etc but for these ones thats far too late. Noone in the UK has to live in poverty.
Southern law girl
Researching my viewpoint....
10:54 on 08/02/2012
Historically always the case, is now, and the future, the elderly always suffer. The cuts are mostly responsble, but so are decisions to allow free Ipads for MP's, and all the other expenses they are allowed to claim. If people want to enter Parliament they should do so as if it were an honour, vocation, or calling, because they all say they go into politics to make a difference:-( They are in the peoples pay which should not be for large personal gain, if they don't like the conditions, leave and find employment elsewhere. Personally, I believe it is largely through mismanagement of financial planning that we are up the river without a paddle now, and of course along with bankers and other big bonus beasts. But they do deserve a reasonable salary, and that salary should take account of out of pocket expenses, it should be uniform, in other words, all working under the same conditions. Also, to save money, why can they not stay in special MP's acccommodation, like a boarding block for instance, this would save masses of money, and maybe just allow the elderly to live out their lives in dignity, just a couple of ideas.
11:12 on 08/02/2012
They do enter parliament as a calling. The calling of large salaries, easy to fiddle expenses that would land anyone else behind bars, and the chance to make loads of money on the side as a "consultant".
Southern law girl
Researching my viewpoint....
11:25 on 08/02/2012
Damilton, I could not agree more. I wonder with all this how long this Government will have to run, only needs a vote of no confidence to the slippery slope, the Queen disolves Parliament, and hey presto a General Election. It's not quite as simple as that, because I haven't gone through all the Constitutional process, but I am sure you get the thread. We shall have to wait and see. I am no habitual Government basher, I think they all have fault, some more than others.
11:58 on 08/02/2012
Good comment
10:18 on 08/02/2012
i applaud this story and all its contributors...its everything anyone other than the goverment who are involved in social care are and have been saying for some time.its a disgrace that ageuk have to set up an e-petition to try to get enough signatures to try to stop what this goverment is doing to social care,ive sent this over to my local mp,i was only disscussing this with her yesterday,and leaving this hanging by a thread untill 2014/15 for further funding well i cant find any words that would be printable to describe what that would mean to the people who are elderly and ill or have dementia and disabilitys to cope with,as i said to my mp yesterday the full time carers who care for there loved ones and friends saved the goverment £119bn last year that amount will rise this year and its a real saving year on year why cant the goverment use this each year to top up social care...or maybe its allocated for council bonuses!
10:09 on 08/02/2012
Because of government cuts, not local authority, my area as had several warden positions reduced.
A couple of weeks ago an elderly lady had her warden taken away. She as since passed away through hypothermia.
The question is would she still be here if she still had her warden?
I have no strong objections about having to make cuts but I do strongly object by the amount and the time these cuts are being placed on the community.
No one can avoid getting older and some cannot avoid becoming infirm. Most have worked all their lives and paid taxes and national insurance and were told that it was to look after them when they retire.
I am now retired and despite a private pension find myself being treated as a second-class citizen by most organisations.
We elderly do not wish handouts but just be treated with respect and understanding that some of us do need some assistance that is not always money orientated.