Gary McKinnon 'Consumed By Terror' Over Extradition Fear, Mother Says

Gary Mckinnon

First Posted: 8/02/2012 05:53 Updated: 8/02/2012 05:59   PA

Computer hacker Gary McKinnon is "unable to control the terror that consumes his every waking moment" as he fights extradition to the US, his mother said on Wednesday.

Janis Sharp said the treatment of her son, who admits hacking into military computers but claims he was looking for evidence of UFOs, was "barbaric".

She urged Prime Minister David Cameron to raise the issue with US president Barack Obama when the two leaders meet at the White House next month.

Ms Sharp said: "10 years have gone by and still Gary lives in a nightmare world - unable to control the terror that consumes his every waking moment.

"This endless pressure on an Aspergic man with severe mental health issues is barbaric.

"And for what? A foolish act that caused embarrassment to the US. Where has our sense of proportion gone?"

The High Court expressed concern over how long McKinnon's case was taking to return to court last month, with two judges listing the case for July in a bid to speed matters up.

They acted after hearing that Home Secretary Theresa May is "considering afresh" whether Asperger's sufferer McKinnon should be extradited to the US to face trial for hacking into military computers in 2002.

Ms Sharp was speaking ahead of meeting supporters outside Number 10 today to hand over poems of support for her son to mark the 10th anniversary of his first arrest.

She said: "In March David Cameron is visiting President Obama to discuss our 'special relationship'.

"What an opportunity for our PM to finally announce an end to Gary's 10-year ordeal.

"This act alone would prove that the 'special relationship' has true meaning and is one of mutual respect."

McKinnon's legal team hopes Mrs May will block extradition amid predictions he could be jailed for 60 years in America.

Medical evidence shows the 45-year-old was "suffering from a serious mental disorder and there is a serious risk of suicide if extradited", his legal team has said.

McKinnon, from Wood Green, north London, admits hacking but claims he was looking for evidence of UFOs.

Arrested in 2002, and then again in 2005, an order for his extradition was made in July 2006 under the 2003 Extradition Act.

That triggered three successive applications for judicial review and questions about the fairness of the UK-US extradition treaty, which critics claim is "one-sided".

An independent review of the UK's extradition arrangements by Sir Scott Baker last year found the current treaty between the US and the UK was both balanced and fair.

But the Government is under pressure to ignore its findings after MPs called on ministers to bring forward new laws and attempt to change the UK-US extradition treaty.

In a House of Commons debate in December Tory MP Dominic Raab said: "Gary McKinnon should not be treated like some gangland mobster or al Qaida mastermind."

A number of other figures in high-profile cases are also fighting extradition to the US, including 23-year-old student Richard O'Dwyer who is accused of breaking American copyright laws.

Retired businessman Christopher Tappin, who is accused of conspiring to sell components for Iranian missiles, and Babar Ahmad, who is wanted for allegedly raising funds for Chechen and Afghan insurgents over the internet, are also fighting against extradition.

Ms Sharp added: "My heart goes out to others in a similar situation including Chris Tappin, Richard O'Dwyer and Babar Ahmad and their families, who are themselves suffering at the hands of a discredited piece of legislation.

"I remain confident our Government will eventually do the right thing and amend our extradition laws."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Computer hacker Gary McKinnon is "unable to control the terror that consumes his every waking moment" as he fights extradition to the US, his mother said on Wednesday. Janis Sharp said the treatmen...
Computer hacker Gary McKinnon is "unable to control the terror that consumes his every waking moment" as he fights extradition to the US, his mother said on Wednesday. Janis Sharp said the treatmen...
Filed by Ned Simons  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:49 PM on 02/12/2012
Unbelievable , reading the posts here , for a moment think about why garry hacked the computers ?

nasa will be exposed in due time and others to follow shortly.......thats a fact !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:57 AM on 02/09/2012
Oh, and generally, I am utterly in agreement about the outrageous extradiction treaty that Blair bound us to. It's grossly weighted in favour of the US, who would never allow one of their citizens to be dragged here to court in the same way we're expected to do with ours when they click their fingers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:55 AM on 02/09/2012
I am constantly irritated by the way this woman uses her son's supposed mental issues. You can't have it both ways. If he's that seriously mentally impaired then she should never have allowed him to use a computer alone and unsupervised as clearly he wasn't mature or competent enough to do so. But since he was apparently fine to do so, then you can't suddenly claim he's some poor mental defective once he gets into trouble.

Having said that, 10 years is ridiculous. Surely that comes under cruel and unusual punishment? I thought that the US had laws that put time limits on court cases, so that cases were brought timeously?
09:32 PM on 02/09/2012
You can't just ban everyone who has psychological problems from using computers or going out in public, just in case they do something odd or nonconformist. You'd effectively have to lock all of us up for life. And somebody would have to pay for us being kept out of anywhere we might inadvertently break some law or other. It's not as simple as "either you're a responsible bourgeois subject in full self-control at all times, or you shouldn't be allowed on a computer / out in the world" - even if this is your personal ideal (scary as it is), it's not sustainable in today's world of benefit cuts and asylum closures. Unless you're prepared to pay some inordinate amount to keep all of us with psychological problems under constant supervision, you're going to have to allow a lot of leeway that we will do things that we can't control, that you don't understand, and/or that we've no way of knowing neurotypicals would be so peed-off by.

In any case, McKinnon's mother mainly emphasises the psychological impact of the persecution and deportation threats, which would be intolerable to anyone with AS. This is completely separate from whether he's responsible for his actions or not. If someone's allergic to roses then it's a human rights violation to lock them in a rose-garden, whatever crime they're convicted of. The impact of this kind of process on someone with AS is clearly directly comparable - it's psychological torture.
10:29 PM on 02/09/2012
Personally I think AS fixations (and meltdowns) should be considered as non-self-control and simply tolerated, because they don't meet the criterion of mens rea and neurotypicals aren't punished for things they can't help (e.g. panic). This might take some getting used to, but so did gay rights, women's rights and disability rights. If people can modify millions of buildings for wheelchair access, or translate thousands of government documents into minority languages, they can also put up with a few hacked systems, dissected phone-boxes and missing lightbulbs to avoid ruining the lives of people who happen to have been born different. Without Asperger's you wouldn't have an Internet anyway, so it's a small price to pay. In many ways it's still a crime to be different in modern Britain, as BIBIC have shown - autism is basically a crime in Britain, since it's a crime to alarm or distress neurotypicals. Our very existence is illegal here, and in America too. History will remember this as an atrocity against difference I'm sure, but for now we're going through a cultural Dark Age.
01:38 PM on 02/08/2012
Tell the USA to shove it. They shouldn't have the right to just extradite people from the UK whenever the suspect something. It's totally wrong. Had to laugh at the Huffs headline though CONSUMED BY TERROR!!!! just ridiculous.
10:28 PM on 02/09/2012
It's not ridiculous, it's completely what happens to people with AS subjected to unexpected, traumatic experiences or risks. Remember that people with AS have an amygdala 15% larger than average. People with AS often experience acute anxiety over small changes in routine. McKinnon is facing the danger of being sent halfway around the world, away from all familiar people and places. Of course he's in terror. - Incidentally, people seem to underestimate the severity of the psychological impact of state-initiated actions, compared to those of others. The media regularly refers to people being "terrorised" or "lives made a misery" by name-calling, criminal damage and the like. I know people who've been through criminal trials, and confrontational custody disputes, and I can tell you it's ten times worse than name-calling, somewhat worse even than burglary (and that's pretty traumatising). It turns lives upside down, it makes people so anxious they can't relax or work. It keeps this going for months or years, like a hatchet over someone's neck. And that's for people facing minor charges, in their own country, who are innocent, and who don't have AS. It really is something that's done far too lightly, taken far too lightly.
12:47 PM on 02/08/2012
Britain should stop allowing its citizens to be extradited to the USA until they can prove they are a trustworthy society.
KenInd
We too shall get through this.....
10:33 AM on 02/08/2012
If he is innocent; why is he so fearful of being extradited?

If he is mentally incompetent to stand trial, the UK should have ruled this way already.

Innocent folk want their day in court. Clearly the system in the UK has not found compelling reasons to prevent his extradition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wmholt
You can't not know. You can't not care.
10:59 AM on 02/08/2012
I don't think that McKinnon believes he is innocent. The point is that he would be made an example of by the U.S., where the punishment would be so grotesquely out of proportion to his crime, that he could spend the rest of his life in prison.

No one is saying he is mentally incompetent to stand trial either. He is saying that his mental illness was a factor to consider in his illegal behavior, presumably impairing his judgment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:58 AM on 02/09/2012
Then he should never have been allowed to use a computer unsupervised. Since he did, and his mother was okay with that, they can't now claim it was his mental issues wot did it as a defence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Steve Lane
01:23 PM on 02/08/2012
In many ways America is a barbaric country where people can be given excessive prison terms for trivial offences. Its a bit like Iran.