Syria Crisis: UN Calls For Intervention After 50 More Killed In 'Heaviest' Bombardment

Huffington Post UK    
First Posted: 8/02/2012 13:47 Updated: 8/02/2012 16:45

Syrian government forces have continued shelling the city of Homs for a fifth day in some of the heaviest bombardment seen so far, prompting the UN to call for "urgent" international action to stop the violence.

Activists said that at least 50 people had died on Wednesday even as President Bashar al-Assad told the foreign minister of Russia that he would end the killing.

A poll by YouGov revealed a majority of Britons did not want to send troops to the region, but growing calls for intervention including from the UN's top human rights official built pressure on the international community to respond.

The Associated Press also reported that the EU was preparing to impose harsher sanctions, potentially including a ban on commercial flights between Syria and Europe.

The BBC's Paul Wood quoted one resident of Homs as saying that "every house" was a target.

"You have to be lucky to survive," the man told the BBC, adding that a baby had been killed in the Baba Amr region after a rocket landed on a house.

Other witnesses told the Guardian newspaper that 13 Russian-made T-72 tanks and many heavy machine guns were being brought into Homs, and taking up positions in residential areas.

Foreign Policy published a photo essay of "Syria's Ground Zero" on Wednesday that showed the devastation in Homs after the crackdown by Assad's government forces.

Responding to the violence the UN's top human rights official called for urgent international action to protect civilians, saying she was "appalled" by the assault.

"I am appalled by the Syrian government's willful assault on the city of Homs, and its use of artillery and other heavy weaponry in what appear to be indiscriminate attacks on civilian areas in the city," Navi Pillay, the UN's high commissioner for human rights, said in a statement.

"The failure of the Security Council to agree on firm collective action appears to have fuelled the Syrian government's readiness to massacre its own people in an effort to crush dissent".

She said the international community had "to cut through the politics and take effective action to protect the civilian population".

There has as yet been little by either the United States or other nations to suggest that military operations in Syria are imminent.

The majority of British people oppose sending troops to Syria but do support the implementation of a no-fly zone, according to a poll by YouGov released on Wednesday.

Two-thirds oppose sending British troops to the country, but 60% said that a no-fly zone should be imposed. Just 18% said that a no-fly zone should not be implemented.

Just over one in five believe that a no-fly zone should be imposed even without the approval of the UN.

In the United States CNN quoted a military official as saying that it has put "ideas on the table" for potential intervention, but that no decisions had been made.

In the face of the growing evidence of violence against civilians China and Russia, who recently vetoed a UN security council resolution condemning Assad's actions, have remained defiant.

The foreign minister of Russia Sergei Lavrov yesterday visited Damascus and was met by cheering crowds waving Russian flags.

Russia says that Lavrov pushed Assad to bring the violence to an end, but stressed the importance of Syrian sovereignty.

Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin warned on Wednesday that the world could not act like an "elephant in a china shop" over Syria and said that he could "not allow" anything similar to take place in his own country, where he has come under pressure from protesters who accuse his government of voter fraud.

According to AFP, Putin said: "We of course condemn all violence regardless of its source, but one cannot act like an elephant in a china shop.

"Help them, advise them, limit, for instance, their ability to use weapons but not interfere under any circumstances … A cult of violence has been coming to the fore in international affairs in the past decade. This cannot fail to cause concern."

China's foreign ministry spokesman said that its actions were "righteous and fair and any efforts to stoke discord in China-Arab relations will be in vain".

Close to 6,000 people have died in Syria since anti-government protests began in the country in March 2011, the UN estimates.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Syrian government forces have continued shelling the city of Homs for a fifth day in some of the heaviest bombardment seen so far, prompting the UN to call for "urgent" international action to stop th...
Syrian government forces have continued shelling the city of Homs for a fifth day in some of the heaviest bombardment seen so far, prompting the UN to call for "urgent" international action to stop th...
Syrian government forces have continued shelling the city of Homs for a fifth day in some of the heaviest bombardment seen so far, prompting the UN to call for "urgent" international action to stop th...
Syrian government forces have continued shelling the city of Homs for a fifth day in some of the heaviest bombardment seen so far, prompting the UN to call for "urgent" international action to stop th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 227
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
02:41 PM on 02/09/2012
The U.N. condemds the fighting in Syria and wants someone to do something and they look at England and the United States to spend money and fight for the rebels .Why don"t they tell the Rebels to stop the killing and ask Russia or China to sent troops in to stop it.The Goverments of Iraq,Eygpt and Libia where destroyed are these countrys better off no there is still fighting and killigs happening in those countrys .A week does not go by that we do not hear about a bombing in Iraq or Fighting in Lybia or protestors being killed in Eygpt.
02:26 PM on 02/09/2012
Why can't the U N ask Russia or China to do something in Syria why do they want it to allways be the United States or England who spend the money and kill people for the ones who start fighting the Goverment of a country and then scream why aren't the Americans helping us.What do they want these armed Rebels who want the power, the U.S. to bomb city after city and kill people for them so they can take over .There are still problems in Iraq and Lybia and Egypt did getting rid of those Goverments actually do any good only time will tell but right now people are still being killed in those countrys.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:19 PM on 02/09/2012
We sure spend a lot of time worring about other countries.
We spend billions on other countries every year--boy are they lucky.
There is one born every minute & we are it.
12:34 PM on 02/09/2012
Putin is afraid of a Russian Spring.
08:21 AM on 02/09/2012
According to CNN, Russia supplies Syria with about $3-4 Billion worth of arms/training and the Chinese about $1.5 B. That is about 5 times more than the entire GNP for Syria itself. How can they afford this? They can't. The Syrians do offer something in return. Mediterranean port facilities (Latakia) along with the Iranians, land bases, field testing their weapons against Israeli and Western systems ( proxy war) and becoming future cash customers. The Russians have forgiven most of the (armaments) debt over the years and have upgraded and replaced the HUGE Syrian military on an ongoing basis. The Iranians have joined the party, which means that N.Korean technology is involved as well.
Along with diplomatic cover from these countries, Assad can weather this storm but thousands more Syrians will have to die. I wonder what the tipping point will be? It will not work like NATO in Libya, whatever happens will come from INSIDE Syria. The question as always in these types of dictatorships will be, what comes next? Is Egypt the model? Iran? Somehow I don't think it will be a Jeffersonian-type republic given who they have associated with in the past.
10:54 AM on 02/09/2012
Yes but exactly the same could be said about Israel ( being supplied with Arms by the US).
The US aso constantly vetoes UN resolutions regarding Israel - like when they killed thousands of civilians in operation cast lead.
The UN is a joke - will it speak out against the US for supplying the Syrian Rebels with weapons ? No thought not
12:37 PM on 02/09/2012
Your reply and the foregoing comment illustrate the complexity of the situation. I have favorited both comments.
04:17 PM on 02/09/2012
Syria is exactly like Democratic Israel? Israel has become a technological partner with the US, it produces it's own products through it's own hi-tech industries including Microsoft, IBM and the other top multinationals using Israeli human resources. Israel does NOT attack and murder its own people. Operation Cast lead was in response to over 9,000 rockets coming out of Gaza. The Hamas gangsters hide behind civilians and fire ON civilians, a double human rights violation...thousands of civilians were NOT killed by the Israelis, that is propaganda. The US veto is important, 30% of negative UN resolutuions are aimed at Israel, now think of all the real murders commited by brutal (Arab/Muslim) dictatorships with no UN resolutions to condemn them. Finally, is the US supplying Syrian rebels with arms??? You ask a question and then YOU answer it...why do you need a forum?
moccasinmike
retreat hell
11:13 PM on 02/08/2012
U.N. wow funny how they never reacted to all those african,congo genocides,well un send in the french they been there before,you will only use the USA as the bad guy any way down the line.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
se72748
10:35 PM on 02/08/2012
Let someone else do it.We have been involved in Afghanistan,Iraq for the past ten years and most recently Libya.Could we just take a breather from fighting and rebuild America for a while? Just a little while? Hold down the fort till we get there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
11:56 PM on 02/08/2012
But hey, you are the largest spender on arms in the world and once your guys come home where are you going to put them all? They will have to hotbed in Bragg - you need war, your country needs war, your Generals demand war, you are about to make 100,000 service personnel redundant, the arms lobby will need to find a war to lobby congess to make a war, without war of some sort you will revert back to recession. You set yourselves up as world police, you cant stop now, your psyche wont let you and Iran is next on the list.
09:34 PM on 02/08/2012
Now every death in Syria is on China and Russia--a result of their reckless veto to stop the bloodshed. It is once again crystal clear that China and Russia are more foe than friend.
moccasinmike
retreat hell
11:15 PM on 02/08/2012
redaufx-do you really feel that china or russia really cares,they dont,thats why we are so great we do care,but if you listen to those on HP they have us as the monster.
11:05 AM on 02/09/2012
if you think the west intervene because of morality you are deluded - the west intervenes only when it is in the interests of the corporate giants that our governments serve. It has nothing to do with our caring for the civilian populations
08:16 PM on 02/08/2012
Time to stop the killing like NATO and the US did in the Balkins in the 90,s and in Iraq in 03. Folks think Iraq would have been better off with Sadam still in power. No so.
11:07 AM on 02/09/2012
the millions of people killed or maimed in these conflicts & their families may disagree with you
08:06 PM on 02/08/2012
I have to say I pray americans do not get into this.Let the UN us the other countries to fight the fight We have lost so many of our finest young men and women to that area of the world. Now as far as the killings ,it is bad but what I do not know is, who is the people fighting against the government? Is it the brotherhood? If it is so its just one bad guy against the other It does appear that it is the brotherhood wanting their sect of Islam to run Syria . By the way that sect has pledge to kill all americans
08:04 PM on 02/08/2012
Some leaders are too busy trying to get re-elected and they dont have the time to get involved!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank zarzar
the tail is wagging the dog
07:57 PM on 02/08/2012
Another dictator destroying a country. You would think these people would learn that they can't keep the masses in the dark anymore. Syria has to many factions that would divide the power. The civilians need to band together for a common cause or this situation will play out over and over again.

I say no to interfering openly. Provide the weapons and direction. The people need to take the country back themselves....again. And hang the dictator and his wife in public.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrasmus306
Truth before rhetoric and I will listen...
07:55 PM on 02/08/2012
Something similar to the Libyan consortium is about to happen, as a NATO / Arab States alliance to step in. That would be putting the Security Council in the position of voting to condemn the action, which would obviously be brought up by either Russia, China, or both. At which point, it would end up being vetoed by Great Britain, France, and the USA, much to the chagrin of the other two permaneent seats on the Council, and would then, by default, be sanctioned to operate by the UN, even if there are no material or combative UN forces deployed. That's how I see things happening.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American February
07:08 PM on 02/08/2012
Pres. jimmy carter, democrat responsible for the muslim uprisings against the rest of the world when he handed over the control to the radicals by not coming to the aid of the shah of iran!! Until that time, muslims were held in check but jimmy carter showed them the US was an appeaser nation!!
07:28 PM on 02/08/2012
I totally agree with you. That was a turning point in recent history. The Khomeni radical Islamic movements has caused a ripple effect in the whole region. The dream of resurrecting the world wide Islamic Caliphate was re-ignited at that moment in 1979. Years later, on Septemebr 11 2011 the plan was crystaised after America were brought down on her knees. Remember the lack of response of President Clinton to the first attack of the World Trade Center in 1991. The final conflict that is approaching will be between the Islamic ideology and the rest of the world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
petpetdonna
07:40 PM on 02/08/2012
Carter was a ONE TERM president too, just like our current president.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
American February
07:06 PM on 02/08/2012
Muslims consider themselves martyrs to die for their causes! Nothing can stop the current muslim movement to destroy the infidels or competition against their ruling dictatorships!!