HuffPost Social Reading

Harry Redknapp Criticises CPS Over 'Farcical' Tax Evasion Trial

Harry Redknapp

First Posted: 11/02/2012 08:03 Updated: 12/02/2012 10:28   PA

Harry Redknapp has criticised the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for putting him through a "farcical" tax evasion trial.

The Tottenham manager said the case should never have reached court and described his time in the dock as "horrendous".

The 64-year-old, who is the overwhelming favourite to be the next England manager after Fabio Capello's departure, told reporters that the case was only brought by the CPS because "they thought they had nothing to lose".

Redknapp walked free from Southwark Crown Court, London, on Wednesday following a 13-day trial after jurors accepted his denials of tax dodging on £189,000 in a Monaco account.

His acquittal alongside co-defendant Milan Mandaric marked the end of an £8 million investigation which failed to yield a single conviction.
"It was farcical," said Redknapp in an emotionally charged press conference yesterday.

"It was only (taken to court), as my barrister kept saying, because it was me.

"I was supposed to be saving the chairman a few quid on income tax and he is a man who had paid £100 million in income tax, who at one time employed 40,000 people...

"Four times, we tried to get it thrown out. My barrister was saying 'this should not be going to court', but they (the CPS) wanted to go with it.

"They thought they had nothing to lose.

"It's not their money...that was the attitude they had."

He added: "It was a horrendous period - the most draining thing I have been through in my life."

Redknapp went on to speak about the effect the trial had on his family, claiming his wife of 44 years, Sandra, fell ill because of the case.

"I wouldn't let her come to court, she couldn't have handled it. It would have killed her, without a doubt," Redknapp said.

"It made her ill. It slaughtered her. It knocked her for six.

"Her back's gone. That's the stress of it all. She couldn't move this morning because that's what happens. Your body gets wrecked.
"It has been difficult especially for her. She's soft. She's not a tough lady at all."

He also thanked his football pundit son Jamie, who stood by him throughout the trial.

Redknapp, who has admitted he would consider taking the role of England manager if approached by the FA, said: "Jamie really carried me through it. He was there for me 24 hours a day."

The CPS has defended the decision to charge Redknapp and Mandaric.

A spokesman said: "We concluded that there was sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution was in the public interest."

After the trial, Chris Martin, of HM Revenue and Customs, said: "We have no regrets about pursuing this case because it was vitally important that the facts were put before a jury for their consideration."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
14:38 on 12/02/2012
Why should he pay tax on it its nothing to do with HMRC it is in Monaco paid from an American bank in dollars
13:24 on 12/02/2012
Okay, now guess were the vast majority of the costs, of 8 million went?
Thats right!
The lawyers, the legal profession, and thats why it took so long. Just like money in the bank for them!
Yes Harry?
12:28 on 12/02/2012
You got away with it harry now shup up
09:21 on 12/02/2012
This man has been found not guilty by a jury of his peers! Does this mean that all the jurers are illiterate the same as 'Arry? No wonder he was found not guilty, even though this illiterate admitted that he had gone to Monaco opened an account in his dogs name deposited what is a fortune to some people into this account then didn't declare this money either to his Accountants or the Inland Revenue. Of course this man was not guilty of trying to avoid paying Tax on this money. He's as innocent as pure driven snow!
09:14 on 12/02/2012
I really like Harry Redknapp. He has charm, he's one of the boys, he's approachable, down to earth and a damn good football manager.He isn't stupid. I don't believe he is anywhere near as acdemically challenged as he would have us (the jury) believe. We still don't really know what that money in the off shore account was for; do we? I don't! The CPS and the HMRC would not doggedly pursue a case over so many years on a whim, no matter what any of us may think. If they had evidence that warranted prosecution and dropped the case they would have been equally damned, nepotism, favouritism, one rule for the rich and another one for the poor,it's not what you know, it's who you know etc etc, you can just picture the headlines and comments. I do not know if he was guilty of any crime. The jury decided he wasn't ergo he is innocent in the eyes of the law. Should the case have gone to court? We can only judge that if we were party to ALL the relevant information. My view is; if the CPS were convinced he had a case to answer and they genuinely believed it to be in the public interest to prosecute then they had a duty to proceed without fear or favour of who Mr Redknapp is.
08:15 on 12/02/2012
It seems suspicious to me to put huge ammounts of money in an offshore bank account in your dogs name, wish I had been on the jury.
03:34 on 12/02/2012
Harry does not know when He is well off. It is like putting Ken Dodd on Trial in Liverpool for Tax Evasion.
This comment has been removed.
19:28 on 11/02/2012
Dodgy Harry innocent - give me a break. This man has more skeletons in his cupboard than .... He should keep it schtum and thank Fabio for resigning in the day he was 'cleared'.
18:53 on 11/02/2012
Next he will be looking for 'compensation', lucky guy.
18:41 on 11/02/2012
If I was him, I would shut up and count my lucky stars.
00:50 on 12/02/2012
and i would'nt touch the england job with a barge pole, because if he takes the job and fails, which they all do, the press will say "well we were warned of this guys credentials with that tax evasion trial"
18:28 on 11/02/2012
well, will he now pay tax on the money that was clearly hid in a Monaco bank account?!!!

He flew over there!!! and opned an account in his dogs name!!! Who is fooling who!!
18:54 on 11/02/2012
A bit woof with the allegations ;o)
18:19 on 11/02/2012
I genuinely don't see why the CPS has to apologise for bring the case? They employ lawyers who are very intelligent (no really they are, despite what the uneducated proles might believe) who believ they have a realistic chnace of a conviction...However, what they legislate is the make up of the jury who tries the defendant.Made up (and I've been on jury service twice in the past) of a lot of people who can't grasp simple things such as (and this happend!) being asked what the charge was by a juror! Or being impartial; c'mon, who will convict Redthick against HNRC? It ain't going to happen. managers don't 'see' their star player pulling shirts or breaking the oppositions legs, or overlook off field transgressions, so why would similar mentalities put 'good in the air, good at the back' in the pokey?
The fact he's been found not guilty means the jury decided for whatever reason he was. It deosn't mean the CPS were wrong to bring a prosecution.
This comment has been removed.
17:31 on 11/02/2012
Go into a Court Winess Box Swear on Oath to tell the truth.Testify to the court That you can not read or write That you have never written a letter in your life and that you are Totally Disorganized more than anyone else in the world and cant add up ,the you could be in line for a job paying SIX MILLION pounds a year Managing a Major International Football Team ,Fancy That ????
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allyb999
19:09 on 11/02/2012
He managed to be able to write his dogs name, albeit only for purposes of opening a bank account in Monaco. Absolutely nothing dodgy whatsoever.................... who is he trying to kid.
16:28 on 11/02/2012
I think the CPS were dead right to haul you up in front of the court, you were lucky.I still think you're a rogue Harry....How come you claimed you could harldy read, write, or string two words together at the trial, and now you seem to be managing all of that very well?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
My cup is always half full
17:16 on 11/02/2012
You dont have to be bright to succeed, look at our 650 MPs clever is a different matter..
18:21 on 11/02/2012
Trouble is, that Harry's not clever either. He did what his lawyers told him to do.