George Osborne Rules Out Married Couples Tax Break

Osborne Marriage Tax Telegraph

PA/The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 12/02/2012 06:27 Updated: 12/02/2012 07:58

George Osborne has infuriated Tory MPs by reportedly ruling out tax breaks for married couples in the Budget.

The Chancellor has been accused of "kow-towing" to the Liberal Democrats by refusing to include measures.

Recognising marriage in the tax system has long been a demand of Conservative traditionalists. The coalition agreement provides for proposals to be brought forward, although the junior party's MPs are entitled to abstain in any vote on the issue.

The policy has been subject to several changes of heart - with David Cameron previously having promoted it, then apparently cooling off the idea.

However, senior Treasury sources have told the Sunday Telegraph that the idea will not feature in next month's crucial financial package.

Stewart Jackson MP, who stepped down from the Government last year as a ministerial aide, said deferring the introduction of marriage tax allowances represented a "failure of leadership" by David Cameron.

"I urge George Osborne to reconsider this decision," he told the newspaper. "There is a great deal of evidence that shows marriage has many economic and other benefits to society.

"Not to introduce this feels like kow-towing to the Liberal Democrats.

"Our supporters say they want this and they put us where we are. We need to deliver what they want."

Philip Davies, the Conservative MP for Shipley, told the Telegraph: "We need tax cuts to help the recovery. A transferable allowance for married couples supports the institution of marriage, making it even more laudable.

"The Government should be doing more to cut public spending and cut taxes. Half of the cost of marriage tax allowances could be paid for simply by cutting aid to India."

Philip Hollobone, the Tory MP for Kettering, said he largely blamed the delayed implementation of this tax relief on opposition from the Lib Dem high command.

"Not the first time the Liberal Democrats are blocking a policy that most voters want to see introduced - it only shows how out of touch they are," said Mr Hollobone.

"They support things like the Alternative Vote and the European Court of Human Rights which most people do not want. Then they block a policy like this that most people support.

"We are running out of time to introduce this policy - any delay is a disappointment and will be seen as such by our supporters."

Mr Cameron has repeatedly spoken of his support for recognising marriage in the tax system, as has Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith.

Before the general election the Tories proposed a transferable tax allowance that could have been worth £150 a year to married couples and civil partnerships.

Last year Lib Dem Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg used a keynote speech to mock Conservative support for a married couples' tax allowance.

"We shouldn't take a particular version of the family institution, such as the 1950s model, and try and preserve it in aspic," he said.
Budget negotiations between the coalition partners have been intensifying as the Budget approaches.

Mr Clegg has urged for faster process towards increasing the personal tax allowance to £10,000, while Treasury Chief Secretary Danny Alexander has called for higher-rate tax relief on pensions to be scrapped.

The Chancellor is coming under pressure from some Tory ministers to axe the 50p top rate of tax - a move opposed by the Lib Dems.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

George Osborne has infuriated Tory MPs by reportedly ruling out tax breaks for married couples in the Budget. The Chancellor has been accused of "kow-towing" to the Liberal Democrats by refusing to...
George Osborne has infuriated Tory MPs by reportedly ruling out tax breaks for married couples in the Budget. The Chancellor has been accused of "kow-towing" to the Liberal Democrats by refusing to...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 87
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
Richard Britton
British Socialist Global Realist
01:12 PM on 02/16/2012
can't beat a good seethe
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
11:51 AM on 02/13/2012
I find myself in an uncomfortable position - I actually agree with George Osborne on this subject (I must find a darkened room for a lie down!) but for perhaps different reasons.

The reintroduction of marriage tax relief, even extended to civil partnerships, is a retrograde step.

Reintroducing marriage tax relief would automatically disadvantage and discriminate against all those who elect to cohabit but NOT in a formal partnership.

Currently, people are taxed as individuals so it's a more equitable regime of taxation to retain the present system.

The Tory old guard, for whom almost any progress these days appears to received the knee-jerk response 'NO', need to be gently reminded that the world has moved on since the 1920s; the rest of us now live in a time when people can freely make their own mind up on how they conduct their relationships, and require no approval concerning their personal preferences.

This is an opportunity for the Government to actually prove that 'we're all in this together' by not reintroducing this outmoded and potentially discriminatory tax relief.

But we'll see...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
12:53 PM on 02/13/2012
Well said! Tax should be equitable and this is a key issue here.

The average wedding in the UK costs around sixteen thousand pounds, so it would be perfectly understandable if an increasing number of people decide not to get married in these difficult economic times. Even a budget wedding is still an impossible dream for a lot of people on low incomes.

It would be a shame for the tax breaks to only go to people rich enough to be able to afford to marry.
10:20 AM on 02/13/2012
Marriage as was quoted in the above article, has always been the bedrock of a stable society. The Conservatives are no different to any of the other parties, whatever they say. Money can always be found for populist minority groups or projects, but to support married couples ? Zilch !!!! Says a lot... !!
10:42 AM on 02/13/2012
Tax breaks for married couples should be available and when they divorce it should all be paid back. A marriage that lasts is a minority group.
09:31 AM on 02/13/2012
Why should married people have a tax break? It was their choice to get married and it will be their choice to have children. Times have changed in the last fifty years and we all have to realise that what we got in the old days has put our country so far into debt that we will never get out of it. Pay your way the same as everyone else.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
11:54 AM on 02/13/2012
You're absolutely correct, particularly your note on the choice of whether to have children...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BuxtonBlueCat
Most beautiful cat in the world! :)
09:15 AM on 02/13/2012
"We need tax cuts to help the recovery." Reading the media lately, I think this tax break has been replaced by the domestic help tax break but not for childcare! Obviously the Tories are looking after their own interests as the wealthy employ many domestics to keep their numerous homes clean; Jo Public cannot afford to pay his rent and feed his family, let alone finance domestic help.
11:30 PM on 02/12/2012
tax or no tax this country is just about finished, businesses are closing every day due to the public shopping in superstores that provide everything under one roof and the cheap petrol they sell . 50 billion pumped into the economy and it will all go to the superstores , if we get a bit of tax relief we all know where it will go , directley into the pockets of the rich.
11:56 PM on 02/12/2012
Do you really think that the population will see any of this £50 Billion?

It goes to the banks ...
12:07 AM on 02/13/2012
yes it goes to the banks but the banks will be forced to lend the money out and then it goes directley to the rich .
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
03:18 AM on 02/13/2012
Correct'...But is anyone really surprised?...Just a load of Tory liars...Nothings changed since Maggie' screwed our industry up and sold off all of our utilities to Tory Friendly Fat Cat Rip-Off merchants...Last man out'..Turn out the lights uh?
10:04 PM on 02/12/2012
You get more if you live to-gether ,and not married ,if you are married you get less.Same rules apply when you reach pension age,if your not married you get two full pensions ,if you are you get less for two,how come when we have all paid the same into it.If your married you get punished if you are not you get more help,so much for the tory marriage policies.
06:47 PM on 02/12/2012
And sorry for the spelling and punctuation errors, sadly I clicked 'post comment' before proof reading, I was in full 'rant' mode lol
06:46 PM on 02/12/2012
I wish I could afford to take the top tax officers out to very expensive eating places looking down at the Ivy as a burger bar.
If I was a 'phone company or financial institution I could get away with Billions!
06:44 PM on 02/12/2012
The whole lot needs a re-think.
Why on earth should married couples get extra benefits? That's discrimination isn't it?
Why should people who can't afford kids, be paid money for having them?
There was a time when the welfare state was about making sure money went to those who really need it. These days people are so well off, they don't know what's it's like to go without.
When you walk into the house of people who live in benefits through their own choice and see big flat screen tv and the latest iPhone, isn't it obvious that something is going badly wrong?

And why should we take every penny from the wealthy in tax? Sadly I'm not in that camp, but if worked hard at school and university, worked 80 or so hours a week to make it to the top where I have to make massive decisions that could make or break a company, I'd feel really aggrieved if the government then said, 'we're not taking half of everything you earn'. That's just wrong.
I fully support the idea of bonuses being results driven, fail to deliver, then no bonus, but I have hit all my targets and get the agreed bonus, what's the problem?

I didn't set out to rant, I just got carried away lol
This comment has been removed.
09:44 AM on 02/13/2012
And there's me getting £54 a week as a full time carer, flat screen TV latest i phone? I don't think so.
06:12 PM on 02/12/2012
Whilst I agree with raising the level for the basic rate of tax. It is also important for the government to create ledislation which prevents employers abusing this by then reducing pay to employee's. We also need need to see another higer rate of tax which goes above the 50p tax rate. Perhaps set at 75p and aimed at high roller executives. But the most important and crucial change we need to see is taxes linked to all forms of payout weather they are in the form of shares, dividends or wages.

Any overseas funds or investments held by wealthy executives involved with the colapse of the banking industry should all be siezed and returned to the Government for public use. This should apply to all wether they werre personaly involved in the decisions, or just profited from the demise of others during the recession.

These high roller executives caused the current state of our nations finances, yet continue to be paid not just high but obscene levels of pay !... Its about time they started to feel the pinch along with everyone else !!!!!!.
06:26 PM on 02/12/2012
Thank god you are not in any position to push through such ridiculous ideas. Lets tax the biggest supporters of the tax system out of the country so they will pay no tax. Good old labour ideas, I havent got owt so you cant have owt either. Wonderful idea. So the financial issues we are now dealing with are nothing to do with the over inflated public sector that came about under labour control? Keep blaming the bankers its much easier than blaming socialism.
This comment has been removed.
09:42 PM on 02/12/2012
Sorry pal, you dont prevent corruption by "paying" the corrupt to be nice and freindly !!.
08:43 PM on 02/12/2012
The Government can raise the tax rates to whatever it likes - but what it can't do is get the rich to retain their money in the UK . The 50P rate is not going to raise anything like the amount in tax promised as it is very easy to avoid for any private sector employee and it actually saves the employer money to asist the employee in avoiding it .

And overseas investment money cannot be seized - UK Law canot be enforced outside the UK - you simply understand nothing of the real financial world
09:46 PM on 02/12/2012
Actualy it can be siezed..... Ever heard of Saddam Hussain or Colenel Gaddafi ?... Two corrupt indivuiduals whose personel assets were siezed from foriegn bank accounts !. All it requiers is an act of parliament from the country from which the money origionated !.
04:35 PM on 02/12/2012
Not surprised with this,Can anyone remind me of any policy that the Tories have implemented as promised in there Election manifesto? Moe lies from Davy boy!!
06:26 PM on 02/12/2012
Can you name a single politician who is honest in this country?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
07:05 PM on 02/12/2012
Caroline Lucas.
09:10 AM on 02/13/2012
Yes,
I dont like him but I think Dennis Skinner is a straight shooter. No frills or graces.
07:25 PM on 02/12/2012
The Tories didn't win the election.
So whatever was in their manifesto is irrelevant.

It does raise an interesting question about the coalition manifesto though!!
04:26 PM on 02/12/2012
You do not really think that this Government os going to cut Aid, albeit unwanted and certainly not needed, considering the amount of Middle Class, Millionaires and Billionaires in India, that could by themselves, wipe out poverty in India along with responsible Birth Control. They do not seem to get it into their heads, that most of the UK population would back such a move, and if the Aid Money was used for Tax Beaks for married couples, then there would be more money spent by Maried couples, leading to more Revenue to the Treasury.
The last Government seemed to favour Unmaried Couples with large Families, than Married Couples, with or without Children. People who cannot afford to have kids should not have them, not just breed away and expect the State to pay for them , regards, Duncan Pettett.
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
03:43 PM on 02/12/2012
This coalition are incapable of speaking with one voice on any issue. The clear road to recovery from this recesssion is to allow some tax breaks and put money in the taxpayers pocket thereby encouraging some spending. Their clear incompetence is so frustrating and will drive voters away... trouble is where..???? Milliband and Balls... NO WAY !!
10:01 PM on 02/12/2012
Tax breaks for whom, the poor or the rich?