Jon Prashar, Blind Man, Wins Damages After Being Refused Entry To A Restaurant Because He Had A Guide Dog

The Huffington Post UK  |  By   |  Posted: 22/02/12 16:07 GMT  |  Updated: 22/02/12 16:07 GMT

Jon Prashar Blind Dog
Jon Prashar and his dog, Mr T

A blind man has won over £1,000 in damages after he was left "humiliated" when a restaurant refused him entry - because he had a guide dog.

Jon Prashar, 48, felt "upset and embarrassed" after being turned away from a curry restaurant in Carlisle last August.

"It was about 9:30[pm] and we decided to go for a curry, three of us, but I've got a guide dog," he told The Huffington Post UK.

"So I went into the restaurant and he said 'we don't accept dogs'. I explained to him it was a guide dog, he came back and said 'I don't care what it is we don't accept dogs.'"


Guide dog Mr T was turned away from a curry restaurant in Carlisle

The Wakefield resident, who was awarded £1,500 and costs at Birmingham County Court on Wednesday, said the judgement sent a "clear message".

"What we need to do is change people's attitudes. The damages are irrelevant and it's people's attitudes [to disabled people] that need to change. I've had similar problems with taxi drivers."

His lawyer Jack Klar said: “There are some businesses that still unlawfully discriminate against disabled people. I hope that this judgement will make it clear to such businesses that discrimination is unacceptable.”

FOLLOW UK

A blind man has won over £1,000 in damages after he was left "humiliated" when a restaurant refused him entry - because he had a guide dog. Jon Prashar, 48, felt "upset and embarrassed" after bein...
A blind man has won over £1,000 in damages after he was left "humiliated" when a restaurant refused him entry - because he had a guide dog. Jon Prashar, 48, felt "upset and embarrassed" after bein...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
05:08 PM on 03/07/2012
Hope the dog left a tip
05:08 PM on 02/25/2012
Lucky it was not a Korean establisment,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
03:29 PM on 02/25/2012
quite agree with owner..a dog is sti a dog regardess if the owner is bind,I for one would not want a dog sitting near me if I was eating my food. He should never a=have been compensated.
05:06 PM on 02/25/2012
I eat with my dogs near me, usually begging, and have suffered no affects.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
05:51 PM on 02/25/2012
thats your choice and you have the right to do so....the owner also had a choice he refused the dog to be allowed in.....how could he be breaking the law?...he had the right to refuse, its his business.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark B Robertson
10:00 AM on 02/23/2012
You should have named the restaurant so that we can all avoid it. Businesses that discriminate deserve to die.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
03:29 PM on 02/25/2012
you do write some tripe
05:41 PM on 02/25/2012
Most excellent idea Sir. Although not dog owners ourselves, we do try to use establishments that are 'Doggie friendly', They tend to be run by friendlier people.
07:39 PM on 02/22/2012
Over and above the disgusting and illegal discrimination aspect of this case, are the owners of this restaurant aware that they turned away, what could have been the best behaved and friendliest visitor that night.
I know some people are concerned about the health aspects, but I'm sure that the doggie. if you could have asked him, would have been more than happy to have risked it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michaelxx
03:31 PM on 02/25/2012
I wouldnt risk it and the law is the law.you would be one of the first to complain if your MP broke the law
05:30 PM on 02/25/2012
I'm sorry, but I don't understand where your reply is coming from.
In first paragraph, I was making the point that a dog is very often better behaved, quieter, and more sociable that a lot of people. This opinion is based on my personal experience in the leisure industry.
In second paragraph, I was making the point that the health risks in a lot of catering establishments, are far higher than than any health risk that a dog poses.
I certainly didn't advocate any law breaking, it was the restaurateur that broke the law by not letting MrT into the catering establishment.