Childcare Costs £15,000 A Year, Daycare Trust Survey Finds

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  By   |  Posted: 27/02/12 06:20 GMT  |  Updated: 27/02/12 06:20 GMT

Childcare Costs Daycare Trust
Working parents are now spending up to £15,000 a year on childcare as costs rise and fewer families receive help with the financial burden, a survey by the Daycare Trust shows.

Working parents are now spending up to £15,000 a year on childcare as costs rise and fewer families receive help with the financial burden, a survey by the Daycare Trust shows.

Nursery costs have risen by nearly 6% in a year, while 44,000 fewer families are getting help with childcare bills since the April tax credit cut, figures compiled by the Daycare Trust show.

The price of nursery care in Britain is rising above inflation with the hourly rate for a child aged under-two up 5.8% from 2009/10 to 2010/11.
The increase for a child aged two and over is 3.9%, while in the same period wages have remained stagnant, only increasing by 0.3%, the survey found.

The average cost for a week of part-time care (25 hours) now exceeds £100 in many parts of Britain. In London the average price has rocketed to £130.

The average bill for a British parent using 25 hours of nursery care for 50 weeks of the year for a child under the age of two is £5,103.
The most expensive nursery recorded by this year's survey costs £300 for 25 hours care, or £15,000 for a year's childcare.

By cutting the maximum level of support available through the childcare element of Working Tax Credit from 80% of costs to 70%, the average claim has fallen by over £10 per week, the Daycare Trust said.

Anand Shukla, chief executive of Daycare Trust said the figures were "bad news for families": "These above-inflation increases in the cost of childcare are.. heaping further pressure on their stretched budgets as wages remain stagnant and less help is available through tax credits.

"Daycare Trust warned that the government's decision to cut tax credits would mean that some families found that they were no longer better off going to work once they had paid for childcare."

The Daycare Trust is calling on the government to increase the proportion of costs which can be claimed under the childcare element of Working Tax Credit (and Universal Credit) to 80%, with a higher rate of 100% for families on the lowest incomes and those with disabled children.

They also want a wider range of children to benefit from the free early education entitlement and are calling for ministers to extend the provision to all two, three and four-year-olds by 2015. Self-employed workers should also be entitled to childcare vouchers, the Trust said.

This costs the low-income working families that receive it more than £500 per year and 44,000 fewer families are receiving this help with childcare costs, the authors of the report said.

The cost of childminders has also risen by 3.2% for a child under two, and 3.9% for a child aged two and over. The study also found more than half of local authorities said that parents had reported a lack of childcare in the previous 12 months, the trust found.

Charity 4Children said the survey results demonstrated the "cocktail of stress" felt by British working parents.

Chief executive Anne Longfield said: "Parents are finding themselves trapped in a double whammy of needing more help with childcare because finances are tight at the same time that the Government is reducing its own spending in this area.

"The result is a cocktail of stress, juggling childcare and for some the difficult decision of giving up work.

"Helping them through these difficult times has to be a priority - locally and nationally - and this is why we are now carrying out our annual Children's Centre Census."

Parent's website Mumsnet said worries about the high costs of childcare are expressed frequently online.

Co-founder and chief executive Justine Roberts said: "While this Government has taken some positive steps like extending free childcare for some two year olds, changes in tax credits actually leave more families struggling to meet childcare costs.

"If the government seriously wants to meet its stated aim to make the UK the most family-friendly country in Europe then, frankly, there's a long way to go."

It comes after a study earlier in February found two thirds of first-time parents are spending 20% more than they can afford on preparing for their baby, putting a strain on their relationship as well as their finances.

FOLLOW UK LIFESTYLE

Working parents are now spending up to £15,000 a year on childcare as costs rise and fewer families receive help with the financial burden, a survey by the Daycare Trust shows. Nursery costs have ...
Working parents are now spending up to £15,000 a year on childcare as costs rise and fewer families receive help with the financial burden, a survey by the Daycare Trust shows. Nursery costs have ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 33
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:07 PM on 02/27/2012
Kids are very expensive for the parents and the taxpayer. If you can't afford to pay for them the solution seems obvious - the world already has too many people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Welsh woman
12:22 PM on 02/27/2012
There is one problem with that answer, if the whole world stopped having children the human race would die out.
11:37 AM on 02/27/2012
Whilst I feel for all parents who have to pay for what they consider to be ''extreme costs'' for childcare,and I speak on behalf of nearly all registered childminders, we do not charge extortionate rates, for example most of us work for less than an average of £ 4.00 per hour from this we provide food, nappies, all resources and toys are provided by ourselves and we have to pay for all sorts of commodities i e; Ofsted yearly registration fees, public liability insurance, house and car insurance sometimes is increased because we carry children in our cars and of course stay within our homes so we have wear and tear too and this is just a small area of costs involved. and while some of these commodities can be deducted from our income tax, some childminders who only care for a few children will see their profit sometimes fall below the lower earnings limit. Fortunately most parents only have utter respect for childcare providers like myself and realise how much time and effort we put into our practise, and say that without our help they could not go to work. so a big THANK YOU to all of you that do appreciate us !!
11:26 AM on 02/27/2012
At £15K per child - which is over what estimated at £12K per child - with triplets under 1 yr old, the decision was simple - I stay at home as a) every I earn and more would go on paying someone to look after the babies and b) why have them if you aren't willing to care for them?

I am trying to get myself something I can do in the evening when they are asleep to help with the family finances. Its tough work but we cope, with my husband working and me providing most of the childcare - without any help from anyone else.

I know not everyone is able to be a stay at home mum, because of the pressures of bills, but I do wonder whether the debts racked up by many has them tied down as wage slaves. Its a shame. You can - and we do - manage with far less than you think. Your children need you not the latest toys.
11:24 AM on 02/27/2012
My mum stopped me doing extra curricular activities or anything at all outside school including on weekends at the age of 11 to take of my siblings because it was that or quit her job. We tried paying for after school care but the costs were approaching the £300 mark, my mum makes under £12,000 a year and was also trying to pay off my father after a divorce and the bills he left behind. I'm 18 now and still babysit my siblings, but there still isn't another option yet. We can't afford anything else.
11:03 AM on 02/27/2012
Childcare costs ... unless, that is, you have a convenient Granny!
09:54 AM on 02/27/2012
Before I leave my comment I know there is always some people in exceptional circumstances and this does NOT apply to them or those who leave a child for a few hours with a family member. BUT I see parents in the supermarket buying expensive convenient foods because they are too tired to cook after a long day. Children in the trolley crying with tiredness because it is 6, 7 o'clock at night. Children that have been up since the crack of dawn! I hurt so much I want to hug them! Childcare costs and convenience foods, take away one of the cars and costs would balance out enough for a parent to stay at home. If a parent then wants to work a few hours at night when the other parent comes home so be it!
I lost my own house, car and rented a property so I could be a MOTHER! I didn't have many nights out, people came round. I did without!! No family support, no financial help from my estranged husband. Children do not ask to be born. Being a parent is a privilege!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Welsh woman
11:21 AM on 02/27/2012
Being a single parent can't be easy and I am sure you didn't become one by choice, but it could also be argued that many hard working parents pay taxes so you can have that privilege unless you have some private income that doesn't come from the state.
And how do you know all those buying ready meals are working parents?
11:56 AM on 02/27/2012
It wasn't easy being a single parent financially but I had a baby to look after. It wasn't by choice I was a single parent and I did contribute to taxes before Motherhood and have done enormously since so I would say that I am guilt free for anything I may have had from the state. They have had huge amounts since. The parents buying the ready meals had 'office' clothes on and such like. It was obvious!
09:46 AM on 02/27/2012
It would be far better if a parent stayed at home to look after their children full time. Unfortunately, thanks to Mrs Thatcher's meddling, one person's salary isn't sufficient for a family with children to have a good standard of living (if that) and both parents have to work. However,this usually means that parents are working just to cover the childcare, little else.
10:28 AM on 02/27/2012
You forgot to mention, Mr Major, Mr Blair, Mr Brown and Mr Cameron - all aided and abetted by their Chancellors.......
12:15 PM on 02/27/2012
Sorry but they could IF they were prepared to avoid useless expenditure on holidays,cars, pointless junk and overpriced "convenience" foods. The basic problem is we have Luxury Tastes with a low pay economy.
Have the children you can afford and bring up. Don't expect the rest of society to pay for your lack of restraint/stupidity.
09:30 AM on 02/27/2012
We have child care in this country...they are called parents. If people want kids, let them pay for them from their own pocket. If they didn't buy houses and cars they can't afford they would be able to afford to pay for their kids.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Welsh woman
09:49 AM on 02/27/2012
I am sure most parents would love the luxury of being able to not work, and it has been proved children whose parents are unemployed live in a poverty trap.
Children are the nations future, they will become our future doctors, teachers, scientists and much more, we need to see they all have a chance.
Of course not everyone earns a great wage and childcare isn't free, even when there is government help parents still have to pay a proportion of the costs.
If people stopped having children because they wanted more out of life, it would be a catastrophe because we already have an ageing population, without a younger population to pay taxes for the elderly in our society would not get proper care.
11:41 AM on 02/27/2012
Yes children are our future, but you wouldn't think so when you look at our education system. Kids of fifteen with a reading age of an eight year old and kids leaving school who struggle to fill in an application form. These kids have been abandonned by all governments for years, they talk a good job to... get into, or stay in power. Google our education system, where it was fifty years agoto where it is now. I don't care what people want out of life, as long as I don't have to pay for it.
09:07 AM on 02/27/2012
Admittedly some years ago child care didnt cost a penny. Mothers were just that. Real Mothers. At the same time family life was just that. Family life with traditional values. Now look whats happened in our schoo;s and society as a whole. Despite all this people will still claim we have moved forward. Unfortunately thats just not the case.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Welsh woman
10:12 AM on 02/27/2012
Although I didn't work when my children were very young, I don't thnk being a stay at home mother makes you somehow more real.
I was lucky my husband earned enough so I was able to stay home, but my daughter-in-laws all work and are great mums, my sons also do their share of childcare, all my Grandchildren are well balanced and cared for.
08:52 AM on 02/27/2012
These costs are a burden for any family to bear below a certain income. But try affording childcare when your child has a disability which demands that they be cared for in the home 1:1 . The costs almost double and, furthermore, you will not get financial assistance as your carer will, more often than not, fail to meet the "registered childminder" requirement. The end result is that parents of disabled children often find themselves forced to stay at home as a carer, a job that is physically, mentally and emotionally demanding 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and for which they get paid the princely sum of c. £55. The pursuit of a career is impossible and savings, if they exist, rapidly disappear. Pension, healthcare and dental plans are out of the question. So whilst my post-graduate education has most certainly facilitated my ability to successfully parent a child with some profound and lifelong challenges and overcome the obstacles to his becoming a fully-functioning member of society (as opposed to remaining dependent on the welfare state), it has served no functional purpose in my being able to access a career. Furthermore, the skills, knowledge and abilities that I have gained from this experience remain unrecognized in the workplace and have no impact on my wage earning capacity.
09:06 AM on 02/27/2012
Jules, you have my greatest respect for the sacrifices you make every day for your child.

I am only sorry your sacrifices are not acknowledged by the state as they deserve to be.

Small consolation I know but you can be proud of the fact that you have given your child all the love and care they deserve.
09:32 AM on 02/27/2012
i am also the parent of a disabled child (well almost an adult at 17 years old) and there is help out there.You can get help with childcare(from suitably qualified carers) and there are organisations out there that can give funds for equipment,holidays,breaks etc. Don't give up.If you need any help then contact barnardos or your social worker or even your GP or I can try and help.Life with a disabled child is incredibly hard work and challenging and many people don't and can't ever truely understand that until they have been in that situation.Get as involved in special needs organisations ,schools etc as you can because you'll find a wealth of information and help there too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Welsh woman
08:51 AM on 02/27/2012
I look after Grandchildren while my daughter-in-laws work and it is a shared responsibility because relatives from their immediate family also contribute to childcare.
I find it sad that women are forced into the work environment, and it isn't always for pin money it's because of an ever increasing standard of living where basic goods and commodities, have risen above the rate of inflation, and families are struggling to cope.