School Refuses To Give Five-Year-Old Leah Johnston Eczema Cream Over Child Protection Concerns

Eczema Girl

PA/The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 27/02/2012 10:19 Updated: 27/02/2012 12:17

An infant school is refusing to help a five-year-old girl apply her eczema cream because of child protection concerns.

Leah Johnston, who attends Woolston Infant School in Southampton, has to apply the cream four times a day but cannot reach her back. Teaching staff have been criticised by Leah's mother Kerry Webb, who said the decision was "crazy".

Headteacher Julie Swanston said staff cannot help her with the treatment to protect teachers from "safeguarding or medical concerns".

Employees will only supervise Leah putting on the cream when at school.

"All I'm asking for is a bit of common sense for them to just help with her back," 24-year-old Webb told the Southern Daily Echo.
"I can't understand them saying they can't touch her - it's crazy.

"What happens if a child falls over... Would they not touch them too?"

In a statement, Swanston said there had never been any issues or concerns from any parents, pupils or teachers in the past about the rule.

"In this particular case we have supervised the child putting on her medication and have been in regular contact with the child's parents and doctor," she said.

"In normal circumstances when administering things like medicated creams we would either ask the parents to administer them or, like in this instance, we would help the child to administer it themselves under our supervision, as long as we get prior agreement from the child's parents.

"This means the child gets the medication they need, while both the child and teachers are protected from any safeguarding or medical concerns."

She added that she would contact Leah's parents to discuss the matter.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK UNIVERSITIES & EDUCATION

An infant school is refusing to help a five-year-old girl apply her eczema cream because of child protection concerns. Leah Johnston, who attends Woolston Infant School in Southampton, has to apply...
An infant school is refusing to help a five-year-old girl apply her eczema cream because of child protection concerns. Leah Johnston, who attends Woolston Infant School in Southampton, has to apply...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:01 PM on 04/18/2012
As a fellow teacher and mum to a 6 year old girl with severe atopic eczema, I too am having trouble with cream being applied. I completely understand the safe guarding issues, however, where has the compassion gone for these children? I have now got my LEA involved and will fight further for my daughter's needs to be met! It is becomming outrageous how certain schools, such as my daughter's and the school published in the article are forgetting their duty to inclusion and the ECM Agenda. Thank goodness I have my G.P's backing and many a letter to confirm what should be happening during a school day. All I can say to the mother in the article is get your local LEA and MP involved if necessary and I do sympathise with you - good luck!
09:42 AM on 02/29/2012
Whilst I sympathise to a point with the mother, there is a difference between handing a child a tablet to take orally and physically applying cream to their body. Child protection is a big issue in schools - and it's not just about protecting the children, it's about protecting the adults around them too. Whilst I am not trying to be dramatic, Policies and Procedures are there for a reason and should be followed. Whilst there could be an element of flexibility, I am sorry to say that in this instant I believe that the headteacher was right.
It only takes one small comment, innocent or otherwise, and all hell breaks loose and a person's career and reputation can be in tatters in a millisecond.
I have written child protection policies as a school governor and it's tough to know that you have to think that way, but you have no choice. Albeit a small proportion of the population, there are a still too many people in our schools that would take advantage, given the chance, of an open policy in Child Protection to abuse children.
You will never get rid of these nasty people of this world, but informative, well written advisive Child Protection Policies and good practice go a long way to protecting our children.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
minimemo
Can I be your friend...if they let me out...
10:50 PM on 02/28/2012
I've had to do similar with my child and the school just got me to sign a form stating the medicine that had to be applied, where and when. Get's done after lunch but before lessons begin and there are two adults present. It's not that difficult but we now live in a society driven by excuses and problems rather than reasons and solutions!
03:26 PM on 02/28/2012
That is why they have school nurses in EACH school so that trained professionals are applying the medication and not teachers. Teachers have enough to do to teach the children now they have to wear the hat of the nurse too. Plus that means the teacher has to leave the other children in care of an aide to go to the bathroom to apply the medication.....Hire a freaking school nurse...case solved for so many.....
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
04:51 PM on 02/27/2012
Nanny state and a complete lack of common sense. And that's the head!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
02:00 PM on 02/27/2012
The merit system is hard at work...again! Headteacher Julie Swanston is a prime example.
02:16 PM on 02/27/2012
I don't think you can blame the headteacher for following guidelines. You have to work in the system to know how it operates.Once a child makes allegation against you for TOUCHING them you are damn forever even if there was no truth in it. Blame the system which makes people look uncaring
04:43 PM on 02/27/2012
The school state that there has never been any concerns about their policy before. My answer would be "and your point is?" Someone has to be the first and now it's happened.
12:01 PM on 02/27/2012
Madness. How are they supervising her applying cream to her back? PC gone awol
12:40 PM on 02/27/2012
If there is any blame to attribute in this sort of case I believe it is to be lawyers and judges.
The reason this sort of thing happens is through fear of being sued for huge amounts of money - if lawyers and judges just told silly complainants to bogoff we would probably never have this kind of fear about going anywhere near a child.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
02:03 PM on 02/27/2012
Garbage! This 'reasoning' is a red herring brought out by every 'manager' who got ahead because of who they know.
01:55 PM on 02/27/2012
You need to ask why PC has gone wild. In the seventies when police radio's stuck to single channels and were readily heard with a easily available radios, there was a child abuse case in Madison, Wi. A man repeatedly and severely beat his 3 years old. The police who responded wanted the child moved to safe keeping, social services did not want to break up the family. There were several attacks on the child, it was always returned to the family. That man finally killed the child. That and many other incidents is why we are so paranoid today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nete peedham
02:04 PM on 02/27/2012
Yes, conservatism and the 'rights of parents'.