Lockerbie: Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi Claims Innocence In New Book You Are My Jury

Posted: 27/02/12 07:02 GMT  |  Updated: 27/02/12 07:03 GMT   PA

Lockerbie

New claims that will allegedly "destroy the prosecution case" against the only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing will be revealed today.

A new book Megrahi: You Are My Jury features exclusive interviews with Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, in which he protests his innocence and insists he was "the innocent victim of dirty politics, a flawed investigation and judicial folly".

The book's author John Ashton is a writer, researcher and TV producer who has studied the Lockerbie case for 18 years, and spent three years as a researcher with Megrahi's legal team.

The book is purported to feature "conclusive new evidence" which "destroys the prosecution case and puts the Scottish criminal justice system in the dock".

The author further claims that the murderers of the 270 Lockerbie victims "were acting on behalf of an entirely different government, rather than Colonel Gaddafi and Libya".

In his endorsement for the book, Mr Megrahi said: "You know me as the Lockerbie bomber. I know that I'm innocent.

"Here, for the first time, is my true story: how I came to be blamed for Britain's worst mass murder, my nightmare decade in prison and the truth about my controversial release. Please read it and decide for yourself. You are now my jury."


The Lockerbie wreckage

The book's publishers say Megrahi "will not receive any financial profit from the publication of this book".

The author insists the new evidence goes beyond the findings of Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC), which permitted the appeal against Megrahi`s conviction that was subsequently abandoned ahead of Megrahi's release on compassionate grounds.

Mr Ashton will unveil his claims at the MacDonald Holyrood Hotel, in the shadow of the Scottish Parliament, alongside Justice For Megrahi campaigners Dr Jim Swire, Rev John Mosey and Iain McKie who have demanded an independent inquiry into Megrahi's conviction.

The book launch will be followed by two television documentaries which further claim to undermine the case against Megrahi.

At 7.30pm BBC Scotland Investigates will feature "the first and only English interview with the dying Al-Megrahi who claims the full truth about Lockerbie has never been revealed".

The documentary will uncover "new evidence that has never been heard before and cast fresh doubts not only on Al-Megrahi's conviction but on whether Libya was involved at all".

Then at 8pm Al Jazeera English will "reveal the secret contents" of the SCCRC review.

Lockerbie: Case Closed, gained access to the commission's investigations and uncovered "fresh scientific evidence" which it claims is unknown to the commission and "comprehensively undermines" part of the case against the Lockerbie bomber.

FOLLOW UK

New claims that will allegedly "destroy the prosecution case" against the only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing will be revealed today. A new book Megrahi: You Are My Jury features exclusive ...
New claims that will allegedly "destroy the prosecution case" against the only man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing will be revealed today. A new book Megrahi: You Are My Jury features exclusive ...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 86
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
karen1963yorks
My micro bio was empty. Good.
08:30 PM on 02/27/2012
So, still not dead of cancer?
01:10 PM on 02/27/2012
Wow, Their Health Service must be superb.
Writing a book from "his" death bed.Truly impressiove.
Months ago Magrahi (or someone) was on a bed wearing an oxygen mask purporting to be be "him" and asking to be allowed to die in peace.!!
It must be a modern day miracle
karen1963yorks
My micro bio was empty. Good.
08:32 PM on 02/27/2012
Bet Gaddaffi didnt think he would outlive him.
01:00 PM on 02/27/2012
Certainly no trial court in England would accept the evidence of a key witness for the prosecution paid $ 2 million and an Australian Passport in return for their evidence - they would conclude it was potentially tainted from the outset .


And Mr Magrahi and his co - accused were charged with conspiracy to blow up an aircraft yet his co- accused was acquitted - how can you conspire alone - either both were guilty or neither were guilty .

I don't KNOW if Mr Megrahi was really guilty - but I do know the trial was a legal travesty for which the Scottish Legal system should be ashamed .
11:48 AM on 02/27/2012
From the outset I smelled a rat because one of the unexplained things that happened were the presence of American FBI or CIA men searching the debris at the crash site. Also, they disappeared without trace. Dr. Jim Swire was right all along to cast doubt on the investigation and the dubious conclusion that Libya was involved without any evidence except the say so of American Intelligence which appear to work to a different agenda E.g. WMD in Iraq. Even Col Gaddhafi knew he was not to blame yet assumed responsibility and paid the compensation demanded as Libya was till then paying a heavy price being subjected to sanctions for many years. His payments brought him back from the abyss for a while but apparently that was not enough.
11:39 AM on 02/27/2012
of course he's innocent, whole thing was set up between the yanks and the saudis, like 9/11
11:33 AM on 02/27/2012
Truth is rising and we are going about to find out who the real bad guys are on this planet! and suprisingly they will be wearing suits and ties ?
11:29 AM on 02/27/2012
I don't know whether this man is guilty or innocent. However, it would not suprise me if he was innocent. There is a lot of dirty politics going on. Some governments seem to think they have a right to invade other countries, to bomb innocent people, to provide guns to rebels to bring down governments - and before they do so they first of all have to try and get the general public in their own country on their side: they therefore create an antrocite, or put out propaganda/lies to discredit leaders and thereby get the public feeling angry and supporting their actions. When infact there is no justification for the wars. In London we had people rioting, our government called them thieves and terrorists, but if this happens in a foreign country where Britain does not like the Politics of the leader - then Britain calls them freedom fighters. It's often about oil, land and power, rather than moral rights.
11:43 AM on 02/27/2012
Aye, I found it grimly ironic that a lot of the yanks killed in Iraq were killed by American weapons as the yanks had ploughed billions into iraq when they were fighting Khomeni in Iran lol
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denspark1560
11:00 AM on 02/27/2012
The man was a patsy, that was clear right from the start. But the Yanks must have a scapegoat and he was it.
11:00 AM on 02/27/2012
Gaddafi was behind it blame the man at the top first
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:10 AM on 02/27/2012
O.K. present your evidence and please don't use old references from the Sun or Fox News which have already been discredited.
11:30 AM on 02/27/2012
Sorry. Utter nonsense. You need to do some proper research.
10:53 AM on 02/27/2012
When this keeps coming up on the news etc, horrible memories keep coming back to me of the time I had to go to the site to help clear up the mess, when I was doing it, I couldn't help but think of all the innocent victims that were killed that day. Now years down the line, it keeps coming back to haunt people of that terrible day, why can't they just let the sleeping dogs lay to rest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:57 AM on 02/27/2012
Because it appears that an innocent man may have had his life ruined whilst the victims of the atrocity have not had justice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denspark1560
11:01 AM on 02/27/2012
Because if the man was innocent he deserves to be cleared, How would you like to be blamed unfairly for all those deaths?
11:17 AM on 02/27/2012
Yea, like it was claimed he was dying and didn't have long to live, so they let him go back to his own country, so how can we beleive that he is innocent.
10:49 AM on 02/27/2012
For those who cast doubt on the enquiry in to the Lockerbie disaster and who have been castigated as conspiracy theorists at last there may be a little more light shed on what really happened and who was reponsible for this terrible disaster. Even Dr Jim Swire whose daughter died in the crash has consistently claimed that the wrong man was prosecuted. The whole saga from before the flight even took to the air to Megrahi's release is littered with unanswered questions, contradictions and downright untruths. Throw enough dross into the air and the real truth gets lost. Some Governments are expert at this kind of action and you don't have to look too far to realize who that may be.
10:43 AM on 02/27/2012
I doubt if the book will still tell the real truth - the power to stop truth is far too strong. It will just shift the blame to another bogey. I hope not, but my cynicism is based on a long history of devious cover ups masquerading as truth.
10:42 AM on 02/27/2012
America thinks it can throw stones in anybody's back yard and don't like ity when somebody throws some back!! and as long as they can blame sombody, coz they can't do a proper job themselves, they are happy and want the world to think they are the greatest!!
mmmmmmm! George Bush seems to come to mind just at the moment, oh not to forget the very best english actor Tony Bliar.
10:34 AM on 02/27/2012
Think about it if you had a daughter that got killed on Pan Am 103 So Jim Swires had his daughter killed on the flight but he thinks the Lockerbie bomber is innocent What do you think?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jacksdad41
Quant Je Puis
11:02 AM on 02/27/2012
Dr Swire was so convinced of Magrahi's innocence he called it the greatest travesty of justice in a first world country and offered £500,000 of his own money to defend him. Any Father who lost a child would want hell and damnation for the murderer, Jim Swire is no "turn the other cheek forgiveness freak" he is 100% convinced his daughters murderers are still at large. If the evidence has Dr Swire convinced (and he is a very educated man) and from what I have read - the wrong man was found guilty. The only saving grace was the man with the balls to show compassion and humilty has been Kenny MacAskill. The Justice Secretary had discretionary authority to order such a release, and MacAskill has taken sole responsibility for the decision on the grounds of compassion. Scotland did the right thing.
07:31 PM on 02/27/2012
That's not what the Sunday Times concluded last year, so did they make up the story that No10 leaned on the Scottish office to release Magrahi?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
denspark1560
11:03 AM on 02/27/2012
I think if I had a daughter killed on that plane I'd want to be sure they got the right people who committed the crime.
10:26 AM on 02/27/2012
That wasnt justice for the victims. That wasnt a trial it was a multi government farse!