Lord Leveson Slams 'Troubling' Criticism Of Phone Hacking Inquiry

Posted: 27/02/12 11:21 GMT  |  Updated: 27/02/12 12:26 GMT

Michael Gove
Michael Gove (pictured) expressed concerns about the inquiry while speaking to journalists last week

Lord Justice Leveson has hit out at "publicly expressed concerns" that the inquiry into media ethics that he chairs risks impinging on the freedom of the press.

Speaking at the inquiry on Monday morning, Leveson said he was "happy to yet again reassert my commitment to free press and press freedom".

"I have no wish to be the arbiter of what a free press should be or look like. I have no interest on doing so," he said.

"To publicly express concern about the existence of the inquiry when it is following its terms of reference is itself somewhat troubling.

"I do not believe the inquiry is, or was, premature. I intend to continue to do neither more nor less than is required of me."

Last week education secretary Michael Gove said the inquiry risked creating a "chilling atmosphere", which threatened the diversity and freedom of the British press.

The former Times journalist said such inquiries could "create cures worse than the original disease", involving setting up of knee-jerk quangos and "law-making entities", which made matters worse.

He questioned whether the Leveson inquiry was really necessary, saying that most of the behaviour by journalists, which caused it to be set up, could have been handled by existing laws.

Leveson said that press freedom did not "obliterate or tramp on other rights" especially the "operation of the rule of law for all".

His comments came as the inquiry moved on to investigate the links between the press and the police. Former deputy prime minister Lord Prescott and ex-Scotland Yard deputy assistant commissioner Brian Paddick are expected to voice concerns that some officers have become too close to newspaper reporters and executives.

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Lord Justice Leveson has hit out at "publicly expressed concerns" that the inquiry into media ethics that he chairs risks impinging on the freedom of the press. Speaking at the inquiry on Monday mo...
Lord Justice Leveson has hit out at "publicly expressed concerns" that the inquiry into media ethics that he chairs risks impinging on the freedom of the press. Speaking at the inquiry on Monday mo...
Filed by Ned Simons  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:13 AM on 02/28/2012
Lord Leveson's statement amounts to telling us that we have no need to fear the consequences of this enquiry on the freedom of the press as we should put put trust in the wisdom of judges. That would be the same sort of wisdom of ECHR judges for example that has led to Qatada to be still resident in this country with no prospect of returning him to Jordan would it?
12:18 AM on 02/28/2012
Surely it is enough that the enquiry detects those who have broken the law and leave it, then, for the law to deal with them. How can that be bad for a free press?
09:11 PM on 02/27/2012
i think the whole of this expensive charade is just to make the public see that "the establishment" cares, when really it does not, if it did, why not have a "leveson type enquiry" into the proposed changes to the nhs, i think we all know the answer to that, don't we ?
lastpost
see biography
01:36 PM on 02/27/2012
"Lord Leveson Slams 'Troubling' Criticism Of Phone Hacking Inquiry"
Good Lord. Anyone would think that someone had failed to realise. That the whole nub of the problem relates to a desire to be raised above critique.

"To publicly express concern about the existence of the inquiry when it is following its terms of reference is itself somewhat troubling."
No one needs to see pails of whitewash. To suspect from experience, that the finish in the big reveal may well be history repeating itself.

"cures worse than the original disease"
Noting that the only ones not in the dock are the public. Wouldn’t it make sense to have elected representatives from that quarter holding the rest to account?

"most of the behaviour by journalists, which caused it to be set up, could have been handled by existing laws."
An ex-police head said on Sunday, that irregularities illegally unearthed by journalists should simply have been reported to the constabulary. Or maybe, tell the fox that something is imperilling the chickens.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:25 AM on 02/28/2012
They were reported.
12:21 PM on 02/27/2012
watching the "enquiry" it was hard to see beyond an indulgent and costly indolence on the part of the interrogators.
These events are carried about by cronies on the behest of cronies. They are a sort of imperial indulgence of the elite with absolutely no authentic passion for disclosure.
Utterly ridiculous public theatre carried about by those who have absolutely no intention of uncovering the "truth".