Nick Clegg Gives Backing To Further Changes To NHS Bill

Nick Clegg

Pa/The Huffington Post   First Posted: 27/02/2012 15:36 Updated: 28/02/2012 10:06

Nick Clegg backed further changes to the government's NHS reforms today as he attempted to head off Liberal Democrat anger over the shake-up.

In a joint letter with party doyenne Baroness Williams, the deputy prime minister endorsed amendments designed to limit competition in the health service.

Writing to MPs and peers ahead of a crucial debate in the House of Lords this afternoon, Clegg insisted that changes put forward by Lib Dems would ensure the NHS "can never be treated like the gas, electricity, or water industry".

"Next month we will return to where this process all began a year ago when we meet at our party's spring conference," he wrote.

"Once these final changes have been agreed, we believe conference can be reassured that it has finished the job it started last March and the Bill should be allowed to proceed.

"We believe these changes will appeal to those in the House of Lords and the House of Commons who share our commitment to the NHS, and believe it can now embark on the reforms that matter: putting patients at the centre, working with local communities, and responding to the financial challenges of an ageing population."

Lib Dem peers are seeking to push through a series of detailed amendments to Andrew Lansley's bill - including measures to strip out proposals to increase competition in the NHS.

David Cameron has made clear that he intends to see the legislation through, warning last week of "chaos" in the NHS if the reform proposals were abandoned now.

And George Osborne said at the weekend that it was essential the changes went through if the NHS was to be affordable in future while meeting the needs of an ageing population.

But with Lib Dem activists threatening a revolt at the party's spring conference next month, Labour sought to keep up the pressure - urging Lib Dem peers to vote with them to kill off the bill altogether.

While that looks unlikely, Labour leader Ed Miliband said that it was still not too late for Cameron to think again and abandon the legislation.

"Throwing all the pieces of our NHS up in the air and seeing where they land is not the right way to go about reform," he wrote in an article in The Times.

"Only political pride is preventing this Prime Minister from dropping his bill. If he ploughs on, he will not only destroy trust in himself, he will also prevent the real change that the NHS needs."

Baroness Jolly, the Liberal Democrat co-chair for health, said there were areas of the bill which are "seriously flawed".

The peer told BBC Radio 5 Live's Stephen Nolan programme: "What we want is an NHS which is totally sustainable, which is free for everyone as and when they need it."

She added that Lib Dems were in favour of "huge chunks" of the bill, but there were "certain elements" party members wanted to change.

"We are trying really hard to say no more competition and no more favours for the private sector and if they come out we will be delighted," she said.

Lady Jolly said later that Lib Dem peers' actions in the House of Lords had been cleared with the office of deputy prime minister.

"The party are totally supportive of what we are doing in the Lords. We have discussed this with the advisers to Nick Clegg, so his office is on board with that," she told BBC Radio 4's World At One.

At the same time, the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) - representing hospital doctors - is meeting today in emergency session to discuss whether to formally ballot the views of its 26,000 members on the legislation.

An online poll conducted by doctors opposed to the reforms found 92.5% of RCP members believed they should now be abandoned, according to The Observer which was given access to the findings.

A spokeswoman for the college said: "The RCP continues to have serious concerns about the reforms and has been lobbying vigorously for changes to the Bill since its publication."

If the RCP were to come out against the legislation, it would bring it into line with the other royal colleges in calling for the bill to be withdrawn, leaving ministers looking even more isolated.

In a further blow, former NHS chief executive Lord Crisp yesterday denounced the reform plans as "a mess", saying they were "unnecessary, confused and confusing".

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

Nick Clegg backed further changes to the government's NHS reforms today as he attempted to head off Liberal Democrat anger over the shake-up. In a joint letter with party doyenne Baroness Williams,...
Nick Clegg backed further changes to the government's NHS reforms today as he attempted to head off Liberal Democrat anger over the shake-up. In a joint letter with party doyenne Baroness Williams,...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whapgra
08:48 AM on 02/28/2012
anyone with a modicum of intelligence can see it is privatisation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:13 PM on 02/27/2012
No comment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
06:44 PM on 02/27/2012
The NHS was established as a Service and is thereore not in the competitve business. There should be no competition within the service or for the service. In fact it is the private health operators encouraged by the availablity of Health Insurance who have the problem. The NHS handles millions of patients whereas health care companies/trusts are in the business for profit and handle but thousands. Moreover the NHS should infact be recovering money spent on remedial operations where the private medical operator has failed - hip operations spring to mind. What the NHS needs is far less tiers of management/administration which would considerably reduce the cost of salaries. Equally, improvement in front line services, by which you mean GP services, do not need control of their budget - they are indeed NHS employees and their practices are not commercial entities. The excuse given by many who support Lansley that the public needs control and choice is all very fine but at the end of the day they need surety the service for which they pay each month in National Insurance [if that is referred to as free at delivery then equally the same should be said of private insurance premiums or monthly contirbutions to BUPA or PPP and others contracts] - they too are free at poiint of delivery. Politicians are at great pains to suggest the NHS is handed out like a benefit - it is not
01:28 AM on 02/28/2012
I had the misfortune to have to stay in hopsital recently...they had a 'private' wing within the main building. I had an hour or two before my next treatment and I visited this 'wing' It came as no surprise that to have a room for the day cost in excess of £400 per day. Then there was the consultant fees, the fees for any medication and treatment, fees for blood tests, fees for xrays then.. heaven forbid.. fees for any surgical procedure that may be required. Long live the NHS as it is intended to be. Clegg and Cameron have just signed their political death warrants.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
06:35 PM on 02/28/2012
Thank you for your response. I used to be a Lloyd's Brikers and oten arranged private medical insurance for commercial clients in respect of their executives obviously to protect their investment and get them back to work quickly. Fine sense of purpose. However I also had 25 years of insurance litigationn experience and what peolpe forget is that the private route as apposed to the NHS [for which we pay NI monthly] the commercial contract. Private Health Insurance or indeed Private Health Care with PPP or BUPA is subjkect to terms, conditions, limitations and exclusions and as an insurance the onus pf proving a claim is on the insured. Moreover such commercial contracts are subject to the Doctrine of Proximate Cause which means if you are claiming for an ailment such as organ failure and you have an excluded condition ro you fail to inform them at teh time of arranging the contract the proximate cause is going to be diabetes for example which may well be excluded. Thus no claim. The NHS has no such conditions they takle you as you are.
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
06:20 PM on 02/27/2012
Cloggy'...You are a bloody disgrace'..Anything less than scrapping this wretched bill...is not acceptable.Everyone knows this is un-necessary'expensive and down right dangerous.We want this bill Killed...Save our NHS..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:04 PM on 02/27/2012
This man..is a disgrace to Yorkshire..