Eric Schmidt Keynote Speech At Mobile World Congress 2012

Eric Schmidt Keynote Mobile World Congress 2012

Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 28/02/2012 16:59 Updated: 23/05/2012 14:36

Eric Schmidt , the executive chairman of Google, launched a straightforward attack on internet censorship and the digital divide in his keynote speech at Mobile World Congress 2012 in Barcelona.

“We need to act now to avoid new digital cast system," he said in a direct address to the assembled mobile industries, and also via livestream.

He spoke with a pure Californian vision for an internet that is censorship free, includes the five billion yet to get access and saves lives.

Schmidt spoke said: "The web is great with just two billion people using it. Imagine how great it can be with the next five billion."

"We forget about these people," he said of people living without access to the internet. "It’s a scarce resource for them, they live in digital oases if you will, and most have no connectivity."

For this group, Schmidt sees his Google Android smart phones as potentially saving lives.

"Every handset could have a basic medical diagnostic tool built in," he said. "Smart phones don’t have to work on 4G there, they could talk to each other in a mesh network."

Schmidt called the net a "digital watering hole", and saying that for nomadic people embrace technology that improves their lives, citing solar chargers for mobile phones and satellite phones as examples.

“Technology is a leveller, those with nothing will have something,” he added.

With greater access, ideally through fiber optic cable human rights abuses and suffering under dictatorial regimes could lessen.

"There will be fewer places for dictators, it will be easier to organise against dictators - we saw that in the Arab Spring. In times of war and suffering, it will be impossible to ignore cries for help," he added, referencing Assad’s brutality in Syria as an example.

He had high praise for the people who will built this vision. "Developers," he said, "Are the engineers of human freedom.”

Schmidt spoke passionately against internet regulation.

“Do not vulcanise the internet," he said. "Do not give in to anything that will divide the internet, with parts of it managed in different ways, even if it seems logical now. I cannot be emphatic enough."

Schmidt did not mention SOPA, PIPA or ACTA directly, but rather mentioned in the Q & A session that there are "many" ways that governments are trying to regulate the internet.

He said they will fail: "The internet is like water, it will find a way around the restrictions."

Schmidt said 40 countries operate some kind of internet censorship, and 25 countries block Google.

In the Q & A session, he showed a brief glint of humour when an Iranian audience member asked when he would lift the ban on Chrome downloads in Iran. As a US company, Google is barred from trading with Iran under the embargo "We can't violate US law, and in prison, there’s no bandwidth.”


FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK TECH

 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:00 AM on 02/29/2012
On 2012/02/21 StanfordDaily article "virtual-learning" [http://www.stanforddaily.com/2012/02/21/virtual-learning/] in Comments part regards to a murder case about a Stanford student May Zhou with which Eric Schmidt had threatened my life:
====================
@concernedNetCitizen,

About your ARROGANT question "If you think you have evidence (and i mean physical evidence) to the contrary why do you not take it to the police, or at least post what evidence you have (and I mean PHYSICAL evidence like fibres, DNA, fingerprints and the like)."

---------------------------------------

I am not physically in America, so I'd rather communicate with the police officer who's respnosible for May Zhou's case via email to tell serious stuff, my contact [peter_vista@yahoo.com] , or we could discuss it right here on this board. Before the officer who's responsible would contact me for a serious discussion, how could you know there is no such PHYSICAL evidence to say May Zhou's death is definitely a murder but not a suicide? As a matter of fact, such PHYSICAL evidence already exists and that's what I am going to tell.

The point at this time is, who is this officer who's respnosible for May Zhou's case, whom I should talk to? Could you have me connect with this officer? I have serious stuff to report

Meanwhile, why don't you help us to figure out what's the motivation behind May Zhou's death
06:00 AM on 02/29/2012
Here is how Eric Schmidt involved into such anti-humanity crimes

-------------------------------------------------------------

Eric Schmidt had threatened my life with the death of Stanford student May Zhou during his fight with
Stanford. Eric Schmidt is part of this plot in May Zhou's death. He had also conspired my life at a
later time, and which had cost his Google CEO position.

It started from a 2004 Stanford campus assault case, in which a lady named Gabriele Scheler bitterly assaulted me; Police concluded that I am a victim while Scheler is a criminal suspect after serious investigation; However Sebastian Thrun later joined Scheler to false accuse me at Stanford, and Eric Schmidt had joined them to support Sebastian Thrun and Gabriele Scheler against ruling from Stanford and police. During their tough fight with Stanford in the early 2007, Eric Schmidt and Sebasitan Thrun's side had murderred May Zhou to threaten me, by telling me: "You see May Zhou, she's an Asian (me too an Asian), ... Police might not even find out who did it, what if it happened to you?" , and to terrorize Stanford (because May Zhou is Stanford student), and they did plot a murder on me as well last year when they found I would not compromise but insist on clarifying their crimes

These accusations had been confirmed by authorities investigation and stand still which Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun dare not deny to the public. Eric Schmidt and Sebastian Thrun had not paid for their crimes
05:59 AM on 02/29/2012
Eric, we know your name has a huge impact on human society, but how could you stand for your fame without completely clarifiying those accusations listed here? Can you deny any one of them?