Welfare Reform Bill Passed Into Law After Lords Back Down

The Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 29/02/2012 21:18 GMT Updated: 01/03/2012 08:35 GMT

The House of Lords has passed the Welfare Reform Bill, having withdrawn its only remaining objection to the government's flagship piece of legislation.

David Cameron hailed "an historic step in the biggest welfare revolution in over 60 years" after the government's controversial reforms cleared Parliament.

In an exclusive blog for HuffPost UK, the PM said it would take people out of dependency, saying it was an example of "compassionate government in action".

The legislation brings in a £26,000-a-year household benefits cap and sets up the universal credit.

The Bill had a stormy passage through the Lords, with peers inflicting seven defeats on the Government when the legislation was first considered and a further one after MPs had overturned all the setbacks.

The government is clearly delighted that the Bill has now completed its passage through Parliament - ministers had been keen to see all stages of it finished by the end of the financial year.

But many will be upset that the Lords caved in over the so-called Bedroom Tax, which will see penalties for people living in council homes claiming benefits if they have a spare room.

On Wednesday night independent crossbencher Lord Best withdrew without a vote an amendment on the Bedroom Tax. The Bill will now be sent for Royal Assent.

The Lords have secured several concessions from Iain Duncan Smith, particularly on payments to disabled people. Labour has opposed some aspects of the Bill, but there is cross-party support for reforming the welfare system.

The centrepiece of this Bill sees many benefits merged into a Universal Credit which ministers say will reduce paperwork and overlap. Disability rights campaigners maintain that they will be lumped in with other jobseekers in being forced to take unsuitable jobs, based on assessments carried out by private contractors out to make a profit.

Mr Cameron said: "While we've been putting in place a sensible, modern welfare system that protects the vulnerable, our opponents have shown they are on the side of Britain's something-for-nothing culture.

"We've stood up against the abuse that left taxpayers footing the bills for people on £30,000 or even £50,000 a year in benefits.

"It's a fair principle: a family out of work on benefits shouldn't be paid more than the average family in work."

The government deployed the tactic of "financial privilege" to override many of the the Lords' concerns last month, in a move which was described by constitutional experts as unprecedented. By convention the Lords may not vote on financial matters, but the government took the unusual step of declaring some of the Lords objections subject to the automatic will of the Commons.

This practice had been castigated by former Speaker of the Commons, Baroness Boothroyd, who had claimed that the usual channels of Parliament had been ignored.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
18:52 on 05/03/2012
big trouble for folks with dissabilitys now the govt have their way.... me personaly, we will proberbly be forced into a 2 bed ..which will mean i will have no bedroom as my boys, on medical grounds, need seperate rooms (which is why we were alocated a 3 bed in the first place) so im going to end up on my own sofa .... whoopeee i think the welfare reform is just another way of funding all the immigrants that are still ariving in droves. it is despicable that the govt is raping our country, surly they must be breaching some U.N. laws?????? btw scuse my spelling ... im to stressed to spell
10:40 on 01/03/2012
Here are the latest DWP figures for the whole of the financial year 2010/11, and they show:

• 0.8 per cent of benefit spending is overpaid due to fraud, amounting to £1.2 billion, and
• This proportion is the same as in 2009/10.

If you look at the estimates for different benefits, they are:
• Retirement Pension 0.0 per cent;
• Incapacity Benefit 0.3 per cent;
• Disability Living Allowance 0.5 per cent;
• Council Tax Benefit 1.3 per cent;
• Housing Benefit 1.4 per cent;
• Pension Credit 1.6 per cent;
• Income Support 2.8 per cent;
• Jobseeker’s Allowance 3.4 per cent;
• Carer’s Allowance 3.9 per cent.
Look at the figures for disability benefits; see how low the figures are.
Remember them next time the BBC is running one of its 30 minute hate programs, pushing the idea that every disabled person on benefits is a fraudster. This government has not conducted themselves democratically on not only the WRB, but the NHS beware!
majdf18148
I have nothing to declare but my curiosity
13:22 on 01/03/2012
That's only the bit they know about! That aside £1.2billion alone would build several small hospitals, pay for thousands of operations, new drugs,home care support et al.It's no good any of us trying to claim the fraud figures are over egged, noone really knows how bad the problem is, it could be better it could be a lot worse. We should ALL be saying ANY amount of abuse and fraudulent use of the benefits system is wrong and has to be eradicated and the sponging, workshy fraudsters rooted out and punished....severely. That goes for any and all who fall into that category regardless of what type of benefit they are abusing. Let's not accuse the Govt of undemocratic behaviour let's place the blame where it belongs; squarely on the shoulders of the fraudsters and malingerers who do genuine claimants as much of a disservice as any body else. Benefits to the needy, jail for the fraudsters!
19:27 on 01/03/2012
I agree that the people fraudulently getting benefits of any kind do need to be weeded out and prosecuted but, not at the expense of the majority. Lives have been lost already and many more will follow. The cuts to disabled and sick people are unacceptable as far as any member of my working tax paying family are concerned, forcing a continent person to soil themselves and stay in it because it's cheaper than to provide a carer that could help them get up and go to the bathroom during the night is....well degrading, disgusting, horrendous, deplorable and well it's just NOT right!
10:40 on 01/03/2012
While the Majority including those receiving benefits know there needs to be reform this Bill as it stands is WRONG. The government gave the public FALSE statistical information, called people names and through their lies and spins divided the 99%. I do NOT believe that the majority would have/or do stand behind the bill had they been given the truth. What has happened to the disabled through this bill and will now become reality is NOT acceptable and we WILL see more deaths, that's right more deaths because of the horrific, heinous cuts to the most Vulnerable group in our society a society that is suppose to be civil. We are supposed to be a DEMOCRACY, yet the government has NOT listened to disabled people or the organizations and charities that have tried to intervene on behalf of the disabled. The government has LIED, re-written history, DRASTICALLY narrowed the already grueling criteria for ESA/DLA/PIP, which WILL result in loss of support and benefits to disabled people who DO need the help and support; they completely disregarded the amendments made by the Lords by invoking financial privilege on the Bill just to get their way and the list goes on. Yes, there are some who fiddle the system to get benefits that’s always going to happen, but it’s wrong to PUNISH the majority for the acts of the Minority. Continued ,,,,,,,,,,
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
09:57 on 01/03/2012
It's easy to buy votes using other people's money. Fit and healthy people can get £26,000 for sitting on their backsides doing nothing while their neighbours go to work to pay for welfare checks.
09:07 on 01/03/2012
Who's going to pay for the homeless families and kids taken into care cos their parents can't feed or clothe them or heat their homes. Who's going to pay for the disabled who can no longer live independantly and are forced into institutions? This is a big step back. If people won't work then they shouldn't get benefits but don't penalise those of us who can't get work because of them! And it's about time rents were capped so people can actually afford them without needing handouts to help!
majdf18148
I have nothing to declare but my curiosity
08:50 on 01/03/2012
We can come up with as many excuses as we want to make out this reform is harsh and unjust but the truth is it is long overdue. All the scaremongering and "what ifs" are meaningless; this country needed desperately to get a grip of a situation whereby, in many instances, it was more profitable to be idle than to seek paid employment. There are a high number of long term professional idlers in our country. I bet very few people don't know of at least one person or family, on benefits, who seem to be living a better life than those who are working. If the incentive to get up and try to find a job is removed because it simply isn't cost effective to do so then a fair proportion of people will be content not to do so. Some people on benefits are on hard times, I have no doubt about that but, by and large, our lax and over generous benefits system has become a global rallying cry to immigrants worldwide to come here. Why else, for example, are all the immigrants in Calais and other French ports, living rough, desperately trying to get to Britain when they already have safe haven "En Francais." Simple answer is our benefits system. At the same time we need to rigorously ensure genuine claimants, those who really cannot work or those who can and are genuinely seeking paid employment, are paid enough to live a reasonable life.
19:26 on 05/03/2012
i guess it wont affect you then judging by your cold stance
majdf18148
I have nothing to declare but my curiosity
19:54 on 05/03/2012
I refuse to go on a guilt trip because you choose to misunderstand my point but the answer is no, it won't affect me. 5 years ago I was made redundant from a vey well paid job. Despite having paid enormous amounts of tax over my previous working lifetime I was entitled to nothing, not JSA, not any benefits, nothing because I was in receipt of a forces pension awarded to me for nearly 30 years service and had saved for the day the bubble would burst.I haven't worked since. I haven't received a penny from the state. I continue to be taxed on my pension and meagre savings interest. So, all I am saying is give the money to those who really deserve it, I do not wish for my taxes to be used to support deadbeats, scroungers, fraudsters et al. I am more than happy to play my part in supporting those in genuine need who can't help themselves. If you find that offensive then c'est la vie!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrisctpaul
Things can only get better
08:49 on 01/03/2012
The £26,000 benefit I agree with. However the bedroom tax does seem to be a little unfair to some. It only affects people who live in council homes? What about people who claim benefits and rent their homes privately, are they also included in this scheme?

On the other hand the government will be killing two birds with one stone, they will force some people into smaller accommodation, this will free up larger council homes for families that need them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
08:16 on 01/03/2012
About time too, this will sort out the bone idle from the genuine. In addition a clear signal will resound around the globe, no more free handouts for nothing. There should be an exodus of all the spongers and freeloaders who arrive here just for that.....
08:07 on 01/03/2012
People opposing this measure should bear in mind that when you are borrowing one pound in four to prop up the currently obese public sector that is responsible for our structural deficit of a trillion pounds, that kind of spending cannot be allowed to continue. This is as good as any a place to start.
08:06 on 01/03/2012
Good bye Welfare State, you served us well for 60 years but, now in a world that no longer believes in anything but money, you have no place.

Welfare only survives when people have compassion, and individuals feel they have a purpose and opportunities; not in a Country who people have for years been repeatedly told, 'to climb the ladder you have to step on those below you'.

This is the position of people in the UK in 2012, those without wealth are convinced that 'it is not their fault (which it isn't) but, it is the fault of those scroungers, malingerers and downright liars, (which it isn't either). The people are fed this lie daily through the TV, radio, press, and advertising media every time they come into contact with any of this group.

It takes a lot of time and energy to not to become dragged into this web of deceit, to look beyond it and, to look just where it comes from. From Companies and Organisations who are financed by or, financially contribute to; the Government.

This same Government has just executed the Welfare State; my only hope is that when those without real wealth that supported this public annihilation come to need it, and they will if only in older age, remember today. The day the Welfare State died.
07:32 on 01/03/2012
If ever the people of this Country have been let down this is is it. Thr MP's on Cloud Nine and the Lords in their Ivory Towers well removed from the realities of normal life.When if ever will we get a Parliament who actually listens to the people who elected them to their well paid jobs with excessive expenses. The so called leaders have realised we have an elected Dictatorship which runs for up to five years. When the term is up we have a choice of the Pot or the Kettle. Not a lot of control for us. They are laughing at the General Public knowing there is little we can do to alter the two party system which benefits the politicians and almost guarantees them security for life.
When I go abroad on holiday I am almost ashamed to admit I am British.
07:12 on 01/03/2012
i work full time and get £1200 a year no benefits pay all my rent c/tax ect so i think its good they cap benefits why should they get more for not working, will gov make my money up to reach cap limit would be good
05:45 on 01/03/2012
How much did he pay them????
05:38 on 01/03/2012
Another crass example of rich people setting economic standards for poor people.
Will this repulsive Tory/Lib coalition govt provide more vocational college opportunities for low income people or welfare recipients? - Of course not.
Instead,will this Tory/Lib coalition govt raise college and university tuition fees? - of course they will and they have successfully done this. These tuition increases will deny low income families the chance to send their children to college - unless they want to borrow money from one of Cameron's commercial banker friends at usury interest rates.
Will this Tory/Lib coalition raise VAT/national sales tax to 20% -another regressive smack in the face to people least unable to afford what is regressive tax .
And then there's transportation. In particular commuter rail fares. The private passenger rail companies shave just been awarded a 6% across the board fare increase by their dear friend George Osborne - Cameron's partner in crime.
So how on earth are low income or welfare recipients who live far away from jobs where are now expected to work under these draconian reforms, when they can't afford the rail fare or pending tube and bus fare increases?
05:15 on 01/03/2012
Ok, so now they've been forced to stop objecting..now the people dont have anyone looking after them..the government can just keep steamrolling along over what we want..nice