Leveson Inquiry: Sir Paul Stephenson, Ex-Met Chief, Says Senior Met Officers Leaked Stories

Huffington Post UK / PA    
First Posted: 5/03/2012 11:04 Updated: 5/03/2012 12:31

Senior Scotland Yard police officers leaked stories to the media, former commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson has told the Leveson media inquiry.

He said that "a very small number" of senior officers leaked stories, which was "deeply unhelpful" to the Met's work.

"A dialogue of disharmony" was created by officers talking to the press "about things that ought to have been kept confidential", he said.

Stephenson also said that officers found themselves "obsessed" by bad headlines.

Stephenson resigned from the Metropolitan Police in July after he was criticised for hiring former News of the World executive editor Neil Wallis as a PR consultant, and for accepting free accommodation at a luxury health spa worth thousands of pounds.

An inquiry subsequently found Stephenson was not guilty of any wrongdoing.

He said that ill health was a factor in his resignation, and that while he had "a duty and honour" to leave office he might not have quit if he had been well.

"Had I not had the health issue, without wishing to overplay it, I might have come to a different conclusion," he said.

In his written statement to the inquiry Stephenson wrote:

"There were frequent newspaper stories of disharmony within the MPS senior management. I believed it was likely that some of this reporting emanated from a small number of self-interested officers, who either leaked to the media themselves or gossiped to others who did. Accordingly I made it a priority of my commissionership to ensure that this behaviour did not continue."

He also said:

"I believe the occurrence of leaks from senior officers substantially reduced during the period of my Commissionership. It is also worth observing, as I pointed out at Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) meetings, that there was a culture of unofficial briefings, gossiping and leaking by people associated with the police but from outside the MPS, who were often referred to in the press as a ’police source’. I considered this to be one of the most disappointing and frustrating aspects of public life in London."

Sir Paul also revealed that Johnson's deputy, Kit Malthouse, complained that Scotland Yard allocated too many resources to the new phone-hacking investigation, called Operation Weeting, launched in January 2011.

He said in his statement: "On several occasions after Operation Weeting had started and I had returned from sick leave, the chair of the MPA (Metropolitan Police Authority), Kit Malthouse, expressed a view that we should not be devoting this level of resources to the phone-hacking inquiry as a consequence of a largely political and media-driven 'level of hysteria'."

Commenting on Malthouse's comments, Sir Paul said: "The reality was that this was wrong but that was a fairly widely held view."

He added: "I think that came together to create this very closed mindset that was defensive in nature which meant we didn't adopt a challenging mindset which is the best way to conduct an inquiry."

Sir Paul said he did not read a Guardian article in July 2009 claiming the Met's original phone-hacking inquiry was inadequate.

He said: "It was just yet another headline - I don't mean to say it dismissively - some noise about an event that I expected someone to pick it up and deal with it."

Former assistant commissioner John Yates was criticised for not reopening the phone-hacking investigation in the light of the Guardian story, which revealed the illegal practice was far more widespread than previously believed.

Sir Paul said a "defensive mindset" regarding phone-hacking set in very early, adding: "That stopped us going back and challenging what was the reason for the original investigation."

The former Scotland Yard commissioner also told the inquiry that leaks by top officers to journalists were "galling".

Prime Minister David Cameron set up the Leveson Inquiry last July in response to disclosures that the News of the World hacked murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler's phone after she disappeared in 2002.

The first part of the inquiry, sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, is looking at the culture, practices and ethics of the press in general and is due to produce a report by September.

The second part, examining the extent of unlawful activities by journalists, will not begin until detectives have completed their investigation into alleged phone hacking and corrupt payments to police, and any prosecutions have been concluded.

The inquiry will also hear from Elizabeth Filkin, author of a report into relations between the Metropolitan Police and the media that advised officers to avoid "flirting" and accepting alcohol from journalists.

Roger Baker, from Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary, will give evidence about his 2011 review of police relationships.

Baker's review found corruption was not endemic but that there was a "hugely inconsistent approach" across forces in their attitude towards free gifts.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
01:12 AM on 03/06/2012
Personally my sympathy goes out to the many honest policemen out there who must cringe with dismay when they see this bunch of two bit shysters who were their bosses. How do you like a group of members of a senior management board who freely admit they have spent limitless amounts of taxpayers money on booze and overpriced cafes at the same time as boasting how overworked their staff were? What examples they form!
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
08:31 PM on 03/07/2012
What examples they form!
**
You'll need a Murdoch tabloid, to pick that up off the sidewalk....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
06:57 PM on 03/05/2012
I think they should sack policemen who leaked stories to the media, without any compensation.
03:59 PM on 03/05/2012
Can remember Paul Stevenson stating you can`t undermine the police, it`s obvious you can when there`s so much dodgy corrupt actions taking place, and some have evidence to prove it!
02:13 PM on 03/05/2012
Why aren't any of these Police Officers that leaked stories to the newspapers in exchange for large sums of money not being sacked? It is as though all the people in positions of power and authority are all protecting each other. E.g. Because the Politicians have personal friends at the top in the Police - the Police are not being sacked. Most people in positions of power and authority all went to the same private schools, the same universities - therefore they are all in this corrupt heap together. Shame on Britain. I'm sure the general public believe that any POlice Officer who took part in this should be sacked immediately - they can go on the dole - and work for Tescos - stacking Shelves all week in exchange for their dole money. What is good enough for the poor is good enough for the rich.
03:30 PM on 03/05/2012
not sacked but jailed...all of them even the ones giving this evidence and i am so sure that the enquiry teams are also in on it as they seem not to be able to grill and expose anyone of note outcome of this enquiry?.....nothing
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lord Justice Wolf
02:12 PM on 03/05/2012
Police officers felt a duty to release some information. Bit like wiki leaks. If your the company boss (stephenson) who has had his company (met) leaked about then of course your gonna be angry. Any wrong doing IS best kept confidential isn't is Officer? Transparency and all? Don't forget Mr Stephenson, it was you who negotiated with politicians on Police officers immunity of prosecution for murdering That guy on the Tube? Your argument was, sometimes officers get it wrong but if we pursue any wrongdoing then NO officer will agree to be called to arms??? Negotiate away an officers right to industrial action in favour for immunity from prosecution?? Now who was it that let that out the bag Paul?
lastpost
see biography
02:08 PM on 03/05/2012
"a "hugely inconsistent approach"
When what's needed is a cunning plan. Might lack of transparency be
the culprit here? What say each player is given a set of hats? Then depending on who they happen to be speaking for, they don the appropriate headgear. Thus an officer in a trilby could denote a mouthpiece for the press. A journalist without a hat could be speaking on behalf of parliament. While a politician in a peak cap could perhaps be commenting for the constabulary.
What could be clearer than that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
02:05 PM on 03/05/2012
Whitewash manufacturers must be coining it in while Leveson enquires......
12:23 PM on 03/05/2012
In the Met the rot starts at the top - always has.The people struggling to do the job at street level are continually being criticised,but they are - as has been said - lions led by donkeys.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:59 AM on 03/05/2012
The Police are more concerned about headlines than the truth: "that officers found themselves "obsessed" by bad headlines." Was there a Financial concern? Interestingly it does not mention if the leaks were lies or the truth.