Titanic Could Have Been 'Sunk By The Moon' New Theory Suggests (PICTURES)

PA/Huffington Post UK  |  By   |  Posted: 06/03/12 15:10 GMT  |  Updated: 06/03/12 15:59 GMT

Titanic
The titanic was sunk by the moon, scientists believe

The Titanic may have sunk because of the position of the moon, scientists believe.

The infamous iceberg which ripped open the hull of the ocean liner may have been swept into the Titanic's path by a rare conjunction of the moon and sun, a new theory states.

The night of the disaster marked the moon's closest approach to Earth for 1,400 years, a near encounter between the Earth and the Sun, and a spring tide.

All these factors contributed to abnormally high sea levels which helped dislodge grounded icebergs and send them into the shipping lanes of the North Atlantic, scientists have claimed.

The huge ship, which was said to be "unsinkable", struck an iceberg 375 miles south of Newfoundland on the night of 14 April, 1912.

Within hours, the vessel had sunk without trace. The disaster cost 1,500 people their lives.


Moments before the ship hit the iceberg, first glass passengers would have been relaxing in this luxury dining room

Later it emerged that the Titanic had steamed at full speed into an area littered with icebergs despite warnings of the danger. But why so much ice should have been in the shipping lane at the time has long been a puzzle.

"Of course, the ultimate cause of the accident was that the ship struck an iceberg," said lead researcher Dr Donald Olson at Texas State University.

"The Titanic failed to slow down, even after having received several wireless messages warning of ice ahead.

"They went full speed into a region with icebergs - that's really what sank the ship, but the lunar connection may explain how an unusually large number of icebergs got into the path of the Titanic."


The Titanic leaving Southampton

Titanic's fate might have been sealed four months earlier on 4 January when there was a full Moon and spring tide.

During a spring tide the Sun and Moon line up and the combined effect of their gravity causes sea level to rise exceptionally high.
On 4 January, 1912, the tug of gravity was stronger than usual.

The Moon's perigee - its closest approach to the Earth - was closer than it had been for 1,400 years and came within six minutes of the full Moon.

In addition, the Earth's perihelion, the point at which its orbit brings it closest to the Sun, had occurred just the day before.


The Titanic film, one of the highest grossing blockbusters, is due to be re-released in 3D this year.

"It was the closest approach of the Moon to the Earth in more than 1,400 years and this configuration maximised the Moon's tide-raising forces on Earth's oceans," said Dr Olson.

"That's remarkable. The full Moon could be any time of the month. The perigee could be any time of the month. Think of how many minutes there are in a month."

The scientists report their findings in Sky & Telescope magazine, explaining how a freak high tide would have dislodged many of the stranded icebergs and released them into the south-bound ocean currents.

They would have had just enough time to congregate in the shipping lanes for their fateful encounter with the Titanic, according to the scientists.

Dr Olson explained: "As icebergs travel south, they often drift into shallow water and pause along the coasts of Labrador and Newfoundland. But an extremely high spring tide could refloat them, and the ebb tide would carry them back out into the Labrador Current where the icebergs would resume drifting southward.

"That could explain the abundant icebergs in the spring of 1912. We don't claim to know exactly where the Titanic iceberg was in January 1912 - nobody can know that - but this is a plausible scenario intended to be scientifically reasonable."

An iceberg in Newfoundland
FOLLOW CANADA

 
 
  • Comments
  • 204
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
06:21 AM on 03/08/2012
Only if it had fallen from the sky at that precise time. And landed on top of that great ship !.
And then somehow managed to bounce all the way back up into orbit.
Kraptonfactor
They're coming to take me away ha ha, hee hee, ho
11:12 PM on 03/07/2012
I saw a documentary that said they used dodgey nuts and bolts on the sides of the ship and if they had used proper ones then the ship would have not sustained the damage it did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jfoste3
08:30 PM on 03/07/2012
I take the moon theory with a grain of salt; safety was lax since the ship did not have sufficient life boats to accommodate all the passengers on board. The most outrages violation was committed by the Ship Captain who ignored warning of ice bergs some perhaps larger than the ship by ten times. Mankind must never challenge the forces of nature and must obey all storm warnings on Land and on sea. With all the changes now made in ship design adequate safe guards are now provided, new ships now have a feature that in the event of severe hull damage the area of the damage may be sealed off to allow the ship to remain above water. Joseph Foster, Author ‘’Seeing Red’’ ‘How America is losing the future’ Available at: http://www.amseph-Foster/dp/1613468121/ my blog Stand Up For America! – Seeing Red; http://boblupoli.blogspot.com/
06:52 PM on 03/07/2012
The moon?! HA - it sank because it sped too fast through those waters at the demand of White Liner Executive J. Bruce Ismay who wanted a test of speed for the Titantic. Had he took the Captain's advice to slow down to a more cautious speed - they could have avoided the icebergs or at least not have as much damage hitting one at a slooow speed. Ismay of course lived, my great-aunt died on Ismay's Titantic. It was greed, pride and money that caused her to sank - not the moon. good grief
06:25 PM on 03/07/2012
Captain Smith although not on the bridge at the time caused the Titanic to sink by ordering the ship to sail at full speed in the night in an area of hiigh risk of icebergs. He was even responsible for the timing of the maiden voyage because his previous ship, Olympic, was in a collision (when he was on the bridge) and parts destined for Titanic were used to repair the Olympic. On 20 September 1911 Olympic's collision was with a British warship, HMS Hawke, in which the warship lost her prow. Although the collision left two of Olympic's compartments filled and one of her propeller shafts twisted, she was able to limp back to Southampton.
04:17 PM on 03/07/2012
Very interesting to note that an event occurred 4 months before may indeed have an impact on the Titanic tragedy.

But then, what about the book titled "Futility, or Wreck of the Titan" written in 1898 by Morgan Robertson?
This novella, written 14 years before the tragedy tells the story of an ocean liner named the "Titan", with specifications eeringly similar to Titanic's (800 ft vs 882, 63,000tons vs 75,000). In the book, the "Titan", the largest vessel of its time (!) sinks by hitting an iceberg, in April in the North Atlantic...
To paraphrase " Slumdog Millionnaire", MAYBE IT WAS WRITTEN....

Jacques Roberge
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
slickbottom
03:45 PM on 03/07/2012
"The sinking of the Titanic was Obama's fault". (A noted GOP political pundit)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blacksmithn
Iron, cold iron, is master of them all...
03:39 PM on 03/07/2012
"And as the smart ship grew
In stature, grace, and hue,
In shadowy silent distance grew the Iceberg too."

Thomas Hardy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jcaesar319
Twas the worst of times;So we got more beer.
03:31 PM on 03/07/2012
Icebergs = Obama's fault. There won't be icebergs if we have our way. GOP

Sinking Ships = Obama's fault . Scientific Fact . Ships sink because water is too thin . more dense liquid like ........Jel-lo ........and ships will no sink ...pollute more water. Thanks again we're the GOP.

Just guessing Hannity's take on this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chesscub
Mind of a computer, body of a walrus
03:30 PM on 03/07/2012
I think I saw a Dr. Who episode about that.
03:19 PM on 03/07/2012
What??? this is what happens when you train all of these people into science and there is no work for them...they invent stuff like this...call it a theory, become and expert and make living off of more nonsenses for the rest of their lives…you know in more or less the same time frame 1913 to be exact, they created the Federal Reserve and it is still afloat and getting ready to bring down our entire country…why do these people start to do something about that…something they can do something about, it is here and now…tell everyone how that works…as far as the Tantalic goes…a hundred years ago…everyone is dead, and so what…and it wasn’t’ t the moon that did that…it was ignorance…
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Bushing
Liberal but open to ideas that make sense (leaves
03:32 PM on 03/07/2012
What an utterly stupid post! Scientists do not deal with things like the Federal Reserve... that's for economists and politicians. Call them stupid and I might agree!
03:11 PM on 03/07/2012
Titanic was sunk due to the decisions of her builders and officers, and the loss of life due to hopelessly outdated regulations concerning lifeboats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blacksmithn
Iron, cold iron, is master of them all...
03:42 PM on 03/07/2012
I don't think anyone is arguing that. They're simply seeking to explain where all that damned ice came from.
04:49 PM on 03/07/2012
Greenland
accelerando
my micro-bio is empty
03:07 PM on 03/07/2012
I smell a class action lawsuit
03:06 PM on 03/07/2012
Pure speculation as usual.
What's next? Are they going to question what may have happened during the 1930's if Hitler had'nt been born?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
devildog21
"War is a Racket" -Smedley D. Butler MajGen USMC
03:27 PM on 03/07/2012
Yes, in fact they even say in the article that it is speculation. So what's your point?
12:25 AM on 03/08/2012
I beg to differ,as at no point in the article is the word'speculation' used,as per usual,a group of Scientists are trying to speculate.
Unfortunately its history & no one will ever know the real reason why this happened.So its pure speculation.However following this tragic event,lessons were learnt & safety of life at sea regulations were improved following the enquiry into the disaster. A tragic event in any case.May they all rest in peace....Captain James E T Pidgeon.MN (Retired)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:04 PM on 03/07/2012
that is sooo funny, how could the moon could be responsible for anything?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill Bushing
Liberal but open to ideas that make sense (leaves
03:33 PM on 03/07/2012
You must not have been paying attention in elementary school science classes... probably just spent your time sticking girl's pigtails in the ink!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:43 PM on 03/07/2012
yes you are soooo smart..I took astronomy in college, so there. You do remember the sun also effects the tides, and raises and lowers all boats. But smarty pants...do you know what humor is?
03:35 PM on 03/07/2012
The moon, and the fact that it creates tides, is a reason there is life on earth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:39 PM on 03/07/2012
Lets remember the sun...it too raises the tides, and has a warming effect on the earth...oh we are so learned..