William Hague Fears 'Rapid Breakout' Of Nuclear Nations If Iran Becomes One

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 8/03/2012 11:33 Updated: 8/03/2012 11:34

Hague
William Hague has warned MPs of the "deeply alarming" implications of Iran's nuclear programme.

Foreign Secretary William Hague has warned of the “deeply alarming” implications of Iran developing nuclear weapons.

Speaking to the Foreign Affairs Committee on Thursday morning, he said that Iran had defied international opinion as part of “a wider pattern of behaviour”.

“Whatever our arguments about the evidence, Iran has sought to conceal aspects of its nuclear programme. It has embarked on uranium enrichment on a scale that is incompatible with any peaceful use that it may have.”

Hague made clear that he was not saying Iran already had nuclear weapons. However he feared that the “accumulation” of research suggested that “it may well be something they have in mind”. He expressed concerns that Iran may build up sufficient resources so they can suddenly defy agreements to not make nuclear weapons.

“We cannot wait or do nothing on a sanctions front while awaiting the moment when Iran has put itself in a position for a rapid breakout of the NPT” he added,

The Foreign Secretary robustly defended the UK’s diplomatic stance towards Iran. He said that sanctions were been important, insisting the U.K had sought to offer Iran “a fresh opportunity for Iran to come to these negotiations without preconditions so that the negotiations are meaningless”.

The UK has been open to offering “positive assistance to Iran on civil and nuclear power, if they can clearly demonstrate [to the UK] that their nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes”, according to Hague.

“Our efforts have been 100% devoted to a peaceful solution. I don’t think opportunities were missed by the UK on this to better relations with Iran” he said.

The Foreign Secretary also told MPs that the U.K would give "practical support" to opposition forces in Syria. "I don't rule out giving more non lethal help [to opposition groups]" he said.

He lamented that Russia and China were "paying the price" among the Arab world for their position towards Assad regime.

Hague was also interrogated by MPs on developments in the Eurozone. Following last year’s “veto” on a European fiscal compact. The foreign secretary dismissed claims that UK had been left worse off in a “two tier Europe”. He told MPs that the U.K was right to have not agreed to the treaty:

“It puts us in a different mainstream. It’s an enormous relief that we’re not in the eurozone. [The veto] doesn’t leave us outside of anything that we want to be in.

The forecasts for this year are better for this country than the Euro-zone as a whole. If that is what it means to be outside of the mainstream, let’s be thankful for that situation”.

UK relations with other countries have not been damaged by the veto, Hague claimed. He remarked “many countries have expressed a renewed determination on working with us”. He went on to say:

“Having travelled so far to 5 continents and many different countries, I can confidently say that not a single foreign minister has ever asked me anything about the December European council meeting.”

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Foreign Secretary William Hague has warned of the “deeply alarming” implications of Iran developing nuclear weapons. Speaking to the Foreign Affairs Committee on Thursday morning, he said that ...
Foreign Secretary William Hague has warned of the “deeply alarming” implications of Iran developing nuclear weapons. Speaking to the Foreign Affairs Committee on Thursday morning, he said that ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 109
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:42 PM on 03/09/2012
Domino theory?

Wow, the MIC is desperate for more war.

What if Iran already has a few nukes from Russia?

What if Iran rightly treats an attack by Israel as an attack by the USA and uses it's rocket torpedoes to sink a few of our aircraft carriers?

What if China and Russia decide to enter the war?

Yet the propganda machine runs 24/7. Iran IS BUILDING NUCLEAR BOMBS...no there is no evidecne of that.

IRAN PLANS TO BUILD NUCLEAR BOMBS If the world keeps threatening them, I should say so.

The Experts say Iran is years from a bomb. But they make it sound like hours.

Beware the military industrial complex.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. Ike.
12:25 PM on 03/09/2012
well Mr Hague . . what is deeply alarming is all the war talk . . and then there is the hypocrisy . . israel has a nuclear arsenal . . . estimates vary but some say over 200, they haven't signed the NPT, nor are they allowing inspections . . . Iran has signed the NPT, doesn't have any nukes, and allows inspections . .get israel to declare its nukes and sign the NPT and allow inspections and lets not forget India and Pakistan . . and since you are so upset about what is happening . . why don't you get israel to tear down that illegal wall? stop braying about Iraq . . your double standards are glaring
12:59 PM on 03/09/2012
oops . . stop braying about Iran . . but Iraq is also appropriate since it was to the Tories bliar crawled to get authorisation to invade Iraq
10:08 AM on 03/15/2012
....USA and UK are now under the control of Israel.
11:18 AM on 03/15/2012
we have to break it
10:23 AM on 03/09/2012
Quote :- 'The forecasts for this year are better for this country than the Euro-zone as a whole'
Really? What? like last year?
As for nukes none of the Middle Eastern countries should have them simple as that.
09:27 AM on 03/09/2012
I have not had the time to read all the comments so forgive me if I am repeating others.

Sad as it may seem but we have been here before. It's like a bully carrying a weapon to keep everyone in check but is not happy if the weaker ones want a weapon to defend themselves.
Even though Pakistan has nuclear capabilities and is the accepted base of Al Qaida - America and the West continue to give it millions because it serves their purpose. Just like they did with Sadam before turning on him. Now all of a sudden Camoron like Blair is scaremongering about missiles that will be able to reach London.

America makes money out of wars - FACT - as soon as one is ending it starts another one somewhere else.I don't like the regime in Iran but we have no right to tell other countries they can't have what we have already got. Its just a progression of colonialism and tantamount to bullying. Justifying it by saying that Iran will have the capability of attacking another country if it has nuclear weapons is just conjecture - We must not forget that it was America who bombed Horishima for 'the good of the world'!
09:38 AM on 03/09/2012
Nope. The USA bombed Hiroshama to cut short the war with Imperial Japan - that Japan started by its bombing of Pearl Harbour on December 7 1941.
09:22 AM on 03/17/2012
No Susie. I think you've missed the point. The real fear - the one that is really behind all this sabre-rattling over Iran's nuclear weapons - is that Iran, once it has a nuclear weapon, will give it straight to a terrorist group to target a city in the West (i.e US and UK) as well as Tel Aviv. The deterrent of Mutually Assured Destruction which has effectively prevented the use of nuclear weapons since Nagasaki would be ineffectual - as terrorists are 'stateless' and the US/UK/Israel or whoever suffered the nuclear attack - would be unable to prove that Iran supplied the weapon.
The War on Terror has cost tens of thousands of lives indeed. But the Islamists want global war - they quite openly stated this long before 9/11 - and are looking forward to murdering many millions of innocent people to bring on a World Islamic order.
You don't seem worried by what Iran is doing. I know I am.
06:09 AM on 03/09/2012
As a Sovereign Nation the UK gets uptight whenever any international body tells it what it can and cannot do. The same must apply to the Sovereign Nation of Iran.
05:45 AM on 03/09/2012
Who was behind Hitler and who is behind Iran?
02:52 AM on 03/11/2012
Are you scared to tell us??? 'Huff' will allow it as it's factual and can be evidenced.
This comment has been removed.
01:24 AM on 03/09/2012
Is Hague planning on going to war with every nation that wants nuclear weapons?
Iran is none of our business; this will be a war fought on behalf of Israel.
Iran with nuclear weapons is not a threat to anyone.
12:26 PM on 03/09/2012
f & f robert . . he is trying to keep israel happy
12:20 AM on 03/09/2012
U.K had sought to offer Iran “a fresh opportunity for Iran to come to these negotiations without preconditions so that the negotiations are meaningless”.
Is that what he is quoted as having been said ?
11:32 PM on 03/08/2012
All this rhetoric from Hague convinces me that Iran will be struck this year, but after the Olympic Games. Most of the contributors to this article, and I guess the British public would agree, that far too much time, and energy is spent in the affairs of other countries, and not putting Britain first. Sort out our economic problems out first Mr Hague, and stop grandstanding at our expense. We don't give a fig for Somalian pirates or any other nations internal problems, nor do we want to give away billions to democratise the unwilling, and ungrateful. The world needs to unite against Iran if it poses such a threat to world peace. Not the foreign secretary of a party that could not get a majority from the British people, and had to join with libertarians to get their hands on the levers of power. We don't want no more wars started on our behalf. Bring our troops back from opium land, and let the Afghans divvy up the spoils with the Taleban, as they surely will when we are gone, sooner or later.
Listen to us the British public, or you will be on job seekers allowance, at the next election.
Stop spreading alarm, and despondency, the public can see through you.
05:04 AM on 03/09/2012
britscot.... the answer is they don't want to sort out problems here at home ... these overseas issues are distractions that allow them to be seen to be doing things.
11:09 PM on 03/08/2012
Bring it on! This planet could do with a couple of hundred thousand years rest from our species. I am sure cockroaches would not be so destructive.
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
10:34 PM on 03/08/2012
...is that right Mr Vauge..!!...?
12:27 PM on 03/09/2012
yup
10:21 PM on 03/08/2012
Jeremy Bernstein of the New Yorker wrote an interesting e-single on Iran's developing nuclear program. Bernstein is a physicist, but it is more of a history of how we ended up in this "are they or aren't they developing weapons" situation. Worth reading, for those interested: http://goo.gl/tk0fx
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
10:20 PM on 03/08/2012
The smallest nuclear weapon now can be carried in a suitcase weighing 53 kilo.The "standard " nuclear weapons ,launced from a plane or rocket is a 1000 more powerful than those dropped in Japan during WW2 .Think on that ,1000 more efficient,can evaporate everything within 50 mile radius then carry radio active dust all over affecting millions of people depending on the wind direction.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
09:55 PM on 03/08/2012
Whatever the rights and wrongs of a country having nuclear weapons, the fact remains that several countries now do have nuclear capability, after swearing a mighty oath that they were not developing them, did not want them etc. Pakistan and India both happily signed the non-proliferation treaty, as did N. Korea. All have broken that treaty, and gone ahead and developed them anyway. So we have always been presented with a fait accompli. They have them,and there is not a lot we can do about it. Up to now, they have not been used because of MAD This stands as I'm sure most people know for Mutually Assured Destruction. Anyone who started throwing them at others would in their turn be obliterated. Not the best scenario for starting a war. Iran is slightly different, in that they will almost certainly use them against Israel. Of course Iran will be obliterated (along with half the world) but they do not mind that, because by being killed themselves in the act of killing infidels, they are assured of paradise with the cool virgins,and the Cabernet Sauvignon on tap. Further their religion (it's in the Qu'ran, look it up) It's perfectly OK to lie to Infidels to advance Islam. So to say they are not, when in fact they are, is a perfectly valid thing to do, especially when the end aim is to destroy Israel.
11:38 PM on 03/08/2012
Good balanced comment.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
09:48 AM on 03/09/2012
Thanks for that
05:09 AM on 03/09/2012
"It's perfectly OK to lie to Infidels to advance Islam."
Similarly, it's ok for Jews to lie to gentiles but not to other Jews. I believe their religions and doctrine are much closer than most think.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
09:47 AM on 03/09/2012
You are correct in that both religions are very alike in some ways. Both are more of a way oflife rather than just a religion. In many ways though they are very very different. Converting to Islam could not be easire, Converting to Jdaism is made difficult (to determine how deep the commitment is) Islam was, and to a degree still is spread by the sword (the sword being an AK47 now) Jusdaism never has been. It is OK to lie to an Infidel to advance Islam,itis not OK to lie to a Gentile. (I have known many Jewish people, and even more Muslims)