Council Tenants Offered £75,000 Discount On Right To Buy Housing Scheme

Housing Scheme

PA/Huffington Post UK   First Posted: 12/03/2012 08:39 Updated: 12/03/2012 08:39

David Cameron has pledged to "reboot" the right-to-buy scheme by offering council tenants discounts of up to £75,000.

The larger-than-expected extension will encourage "strong families and stable communities", according to the Prime Minister.

Those who have five years' residency could receive a 35% discount, with an extra 1% for each added year up to a maximum of £75,000.

Tenants in flats will get 50% off after five years, with 2% added yearly.

Previously it was thought discounts would be limited to £50,000.

The money raised from sales will go towards building more social housing.

The government is also announcing more details of its NewBuy Guarantee, designed to give would-be buyers access to mortgages even if they only have a 5% deposit.

Names are being released of three high-street lenders and seven construction firms who have agreed to support the scheme.

Ministers say they believe the initiative will help 100,000 people who would otherwise have been frozen out of the property market and will support 50,000 construction jobs.

Developers would contribute 3.5% of the purchase price while the Government guarantees 5.5%. The scheme is available on flats and houses up to a maximum value of £500,000 in England only.

Mr Cameron said: "Strong families and stable communities are built from good homes. That's why I want us to build more homes and I want more people to have the chance to own their own home.

"We are acting today across the board to make this happen.

"We're rebooting the right-to-buy scheme to increase discounts for two million tenants in social housing in England. And we're delivering on our promise to offer affordable mortgages to buyers who might otherwise not be able to raise the money to buy a newly built home.

"It's no good hoping people will climb the property ladder if the bottom rung is missing. Affordable properties and available mortgages are vital. So we're working with leading housebuilders and lenders to get the scheme under way.

"It's a vital boost to the housing market, giving people good affordable new homes and backing thousands of jobs in construction in the process.

"This government doesn't just talk about expanding home ownership; we're making it happen."

Shadow housing minister Jack Dromey said: "Today's announcement is too little too late but at least it's something from a Government that has done virtually nothing to tackle the worst housing crisis in a generation.

"But there are questions to answer about this scheme. Why has the number of major lenders participating in the scheme fallen from seven to three and the number of builders from 25 to seven compared with when this scheme was originally announced?

"Reports have also suggested that few, if any, mortgage products will be available straight away and that the interest rates might not be attractive to would-be buyers.

"It would be absolutely wrong for the Government to raise the expectations of families and young couples only for them to find little choice and that they're unaffordable."

Speaking on BBC Breakfast about the NewBuy Guarantee, Housing Minister Grant Shapps said: "I think it is the best deal possible for home buyers - the average age of the first time buyer, in particular, has gone up dramatically, it is nearly 37.

"The problem is not that people cannot afford the mortgages, rates have been low for a long time.

"They can afford the monthly repayments, they can't get the deposit together because unlike in the past, you can't get 95% mortgages which operated fine for decades in this country.

"What we are doing today with this Government backed guarantee is making sure that people are once again able to put down just a 5% deposit."

One banking source said last week that some lenders will need more time to get to grips with the idea.

"It's not a scheme that's going to change the housing market," the source said.

"It's there to support housebuilders, not necessarily to support home buyers as a priority."

The source doubted that the scheme would help those with a poor credit history get on the property ladder as buyers would be subject to the same standard of checks as they are with mortgages generally.

The Financial Times reported last week that a dispute has emerged over the price banks are prepared to charge for a 95% loan-to-value mortgage. It suggested they are looking to charge 5% or more but housebuilders believe this may put people off the scheme.

The scheme is also viewed by some as complicated, operating through a Guernsey-based insurer owned by the Home Builders Federation.


FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK

David Cameron has pledged to "reboot" the right-to-buy scheme by offering council tenants discounts of up to £75,000. The larger-than-expected extension will encourage "strong families and stable ...
David Cameron has pledged to "reboot" the right-to-buy scheme by offering council tenants discounts of up to £75,000. The larger-than-expected extension will encourage "strong families and stable ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
13:11 on 09/06/2013
Why are the Government not building any more council houses? Instead private landlords are making all the profit and charging excess rents. If we were to build more council houses we would make money from the rent, employ people to build them and build up the assets of the country. All these politicians seem to be interested in is to asset strip the country. Soon all we will own is debt and be fully reliant on taxing the British people to pay it off as that will be our only source of income coming in. I have had to take out a tenant loan from http://tenant-loan.org in order to try and reduce the costs that my credit card has built up to. Rather than selling off these houses why do they not put more money into credit unions so that I can access cheap finance.
23:48 on 12/03/2012
I think that is wrong we bought a house and before I retired knowing that I could not afford repairs sold it to rent. We did not get any special reduction this the government going their own way again to the detriment of ordinary hard working people.
20:39 on 12/03/2012
Great less houses to rent. If your going to sell all the council houses at least make some money to put back in to housing. We were only offered a dirty flat in a run down area when we needed some where so got off our back sides and worked to rent privet then bought our own place. now times are hard and if interest rates go up we may need one of the council houses, but there will be non left as the Torys have given them all away for free. Nice one. Crazy idea.
20:38 on 12/03/2012
Why don't the government apply the same policy to private landlords, if it is such a good idea.
20:28 on 12/03/2012
This was a mistake when Maggie introduced it all those years and it remains a mistake today. What it did was kick start the cycle of greed which we see everywhere today. It also had the effect of removing vast swathes of rental properties from 'local authority' housing stock accomodation who then had to rebuild more, newer, but less substantial, housing. I cannot see what this achieves in the long term for the country. It will, undoubtedly, make a large number of people who are currently tennants, very wealthy but it will only serve to reduce the financial coffers of local authorities.
I live in my own house which I have owned for 13 years. No-one helped me buy it. I maintain my mortgage payments without any assistance. Why should local authority tennants have assistance when they have been enjoying considerably reduced rents for some time now and free maintainance on the property which they are about to buy for next to no money?
I just don't get it....
19:14 on 12/03/2012
Well at least all the immigrant asylum seekers that have been allowed to stay will be laughing their socks off - again. We not only let tham in, give them benefits, medical care, schooling, lawyers, compensation, housing - now we're going to give them (among others) the chance to have a cheap house that they can then sell at up to 75K profit. Sell that then re-apply to be re-housed again. I think I was born in the wrong time and place. Advice to all - don't save, don't work, don't contribute, don't struggle to buy your house privately, let some other mugs will pick up the tab.
17:27 on 12/03/2012
Where I live, all social housing goes to immigrants so will they be offered the same deal. Our housing list for local people hasn't moved for at least 5 years. We have however now a population of some 1500 all in social and rented accommodation.
16:49 on 12/03/2012
Fantastic idea, Some have been council tenants for decades, pay rent and council tax, even spent their money to renovate the residence up to inhabitable standard. Previously council homes are not touchable by many as the are regarded as for the poor. Prices of these properties have gone up by over 300% compare to 15 years ago before Labour Party came into power. Many families who missed the oppurtunity of the earlier fair discounts which lifted many out of poverty remains in poverty. They will remain trap as a tenant and likely their generation on the council housing waiting list. With these help it will benefit the people and the Government. BUT I do think London Council Tenants Discount rates should be higher as property there are much higher.
16:29 on 12/03/2012
Housing shortage got much much worse when Thatcher 's policy of the right to buy took off. Many properties ended up in the hands of private landlords who charged the tenants on benefits far more than the council did and the cost was paid by the taxpayer. Councils who let houses to the needy were pushed out of the market without as good an alternative. Houses in holiday areas ended up as weekend homes for the wealthy while the young in those areas were forced into the towns thus messing up the economy.
17:26 on 12/03/2012
Very true.
16:00 on 12/03/2012
Sounds like a right smack in the teeth for those youngsters who are saving to buy or have already bought their first home, be better to go back to first mortgage interest being tax deductable, Now that would really get the house builders busy. CMON OZZY GET IT RIGHT ! Don 't listen to the far left LIBS.
karen1963yorks
My micro bio was empty. Good.
15:44 on 12/03/2012
Will this apply to the entire world then? Come to England and get your free £75,000 gift?
16:15 on 12/03/2012
I SHOULD THINK THAT YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE A COUNCIL TENANT FOR 15 YEARS TO QUALIFY.
karen1963yorks
My micro bio was empty. Good.
16:37 on 12/03/2012
Well the Polish couple near me are 20% of the way there then and the Russians a few doors from them about 30%. These are PUBLIC ASSETS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Daisy May Boldock
Yorkshire..Gods Own Country
16:37 on 12/03/2012
When Thatcher kicked this off, everyone had to stand the first twelve months, before any discounting came into play, then it went up in gradients, achieving the maximum possible which as i recall was about 75% after some 31 years as a tenant
This is 'great' as the money will according to Cameroon, be spent on building more social housing, so that we will have an even bigger influx of immigrants, of which plenty will 'automatically' qualify..whether we like it or not!
15:39 on 12/03/2012
Why should soemone living in a house provided to them at a disounted rent by the council, be given £75000 off the price to buy it? What is the point in any one working any more? ? People will buy there houses at £75k below market rate, sell them, pocket £75k and then re apply to get another council house and repeat the cycle. How long before the Daily Mail starts bombarding us with stories about immigrants who have been given social housing doing this excact thing... I have many freinds in social housing they cant belive their luck. I have 50% shared ownership of a 1 bed flat that costs me £500p/m including service charge, my mate has 2 kids and has a 3 bed house in surrey and she pays £450 a month and has lived there for 10 years on a discounted rent....whilst i am happy she can buy the place and recoup all the money she has paid out in rent and more in the form of a £75k discount i have to ask where is the logic in this...We all want to have the chance to buy a house, even those of us unfotunate enough to be both male and at work... Googles sex change availability on the NHS and quits his job....
karen1963yorks
My micro bio was empty. Good.
15:37 on 12/03/2012
These are public assets. Why should anyone get a £75,000 gift from the public purse?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Daisy May Boldock
Yorkshire..Gods Own Country
16:27 on 12/03/2012
Cameroon by doing this is grasping at straws, to hold onto the voters to be, just as Thatcher did, and we all know he is a staunch supporter of her!
20:28 on 12/03/2012
karen - to get the ful £75 K you will have had to live in a house for 65 years (( 35% after 5 years plus 1% a year ) or a flat for 30 years ( 50%% after 50 years plus 2% a year ) - the Local Authority saves all the repair and maintenance , insurance of buildings cost costs etc - the home owner will have to pay for social care in old age as they now have a valuable asset and/or Inheritance Tax - so the State wil get most of it back one way or another - it isn't a " Free Lunch " - and it was a Labour idea that the Tories have picked up .

The Local Authority can then build more properties with the cash increasing the national stock of housing ( which is what we really need )
karen1963yorks
My micro bio was empty. Good.
21:18 on 12/03/2012
So you sell houses at a £75,000 discount, lose the rent from those houses and still have enough cash to build new ones? I see now, that makes perfect sense.
I am now going to sell my old car for a tiny fraction of what i paid for it and use the cash to buy a brand new Lexus. Once they own it they can sell it and take the cash abroad if they like so that plans screwed. PPS It was Thatchers idea but Labour carried it on.
15:12 on 12/03/2012
What about those that have more than one property cashing in on this scheme. Like those that have a house already and they go and get a council place with all the dicsounted benefits. They are using the sytem to build themselves a nice little property portfolio and that is not what this should be about.
There are genuine cases but there are alot of greedy people abusing the system, shame on them.
14:30 on 12/03/2012
Another Tory attemt to garner votes among the working class. It follows the style of Mrs Thatcher and Shirley Porter's "homes for votes" scheme. The sooner we get rid of this lot the better.