Animals Rights Groups 'Choking Off Research', Former Minister Lord Drayson Warns

Animal Research

Huffington Post UK / PA   First Posted: 14/03/2012 08:10 Updated: 14/03/2012 08:21

Vital medical research is being "choked off" and more people "will suffer and die" because airlines and ferry companies are refusing to bring animals into the country for testing in the face of pressure from animals' rights activists, a former science minister has warned.

Lord Drayson, who was a minister in the last Labour government, said "extremists" had "picked off" the companies which have now pulled out of transporting laboratory mice and other animals.

The Times reported that Stena Line had followed DFDS Seaways and P&O Ferries in halting the carriage of test animals, closing the last sea route for medical researchers.

The Channel Tunnel has long refused the trade, the paper said, while no UK-based airline, including British Airways, would carry laboratory animals.

Although imported animals only account for a small proportion of those used in British laboratories, scientists say access to genetically modified strains bred overseas is vital for some advanced research.

Lord Drayson said that unless the government took action to restore the import of test animals, university research in the UK would "wither" and patients needing new treatments would die.

"What the extremists have done successfully over the years is identify weak links in the chain and to target the people at those weak links to be able to stop the process," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.

"The important thing is for the government to work with the transport industry as a whole to get together to agreement that all transport companies, whether they are airlines or ferries, will support the transport of animals and therefore people cannot be picked off."

Writing in The Times, he said that the pull-out of the last ferry company should be the "red flag" for all sides to come together to deal with the problems.

"By giving in to the protesters, they are choking off vital research into debilitating diseases such as Alzheimer's, heart disease and cancer," he wrote.

"Although small in number, animals such as mice contribute significantly to the development of new medicines to combat human and animal diseases.

"If companies continue to withdraw from transporting these animals, the search for cures will shift to other countries, some of which do not have welfare regulations as stringent as those we rightly insist upon in the UK.

"Medical research will wither in our universities, and as a result, more people will suffer and die."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST UK TECH

 
 
  • Comments
  • 71
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:53 PM on 03/16/2012
“Isn't man an amazing animal? He kills wildlife - birds, kangaroos, deer, all kinds of cats, coyotes, beavers, groundhogs, mice, foxes and dingoes - by the million in order to protect his domestic animals and their feed. Then he kills domestic animals by the billion and eats them. This in turn kills man by the millions, because eating all those animals leads to degenerative and fatal health conditions like heart disease, kidney disease, and cancer. So then man tortures and kills millions more animals to look for cures for these diseases. Elsewhere, millions of other human beings are being killed by hunger and malnutrition because food they could eat is being used to fatten domestic animals. Meanwhile, some people are dying of sad laughter at the absurdity of man, who kills so easily and so violently, and once a year, sends out cards praying for Peace on Earth.”
~David Coats
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:34 PM on 03/14/2012
Seriously ... how many of you people posting here have any experience in pre-clinical drugg development?

-------------------------

It is a necessary evil ...

Computer and cell culture models only go so far ...
02:31 PM on 03/16/2012
I do! It's designed to protect Pharma companies and does nothing for the safety of the patient. One only has to look at the contra-indications of medicines to know that the drugs have not been made safe.
05:01 PM on 03/14/2012
This is utter nonsense, the only people that benefit from all this are the people who breed and sell these poor animals to the labs !
04:50 PM on 03/14/2012
i) The Propaganda- The AR lot are against cures....The Counter- no, they're against ineffective and inhumane methods of testing. The Dr Hadwen Trust for Humane Research.
ii) The Propaganda- Companies that are contracted to do animal testing only want to cure blind children...The Counter- most of their testing is for industrial/cosmetic/agricultural
iii) The Propaganda- animal testing is done by scientists in white coats...The Counter- to get a job as an animal technician you just need to turn up to the interview / grunt at appropriate intervals. Power issues/touch of sadism helps.
iv) The Propaganda- The vivi breeders, the testers and the pharmaceutical companies are doing it for humanity. The Counter- nope, shareholders. On one vivisection breeder's website used to advertise their beagles whole or in parts. The pharmaceutical companies are crippling the NHS with the prices of drugs.

v) The propaganda- it helps "Alzheimer's, heart disease and cancer"..The Counter- stop with processed food, excessive alcohol/sugars/ fats; stop smoking. Avoid aluminum,get some exercise. Don't live next to a nuclear power station.

I know people say " you should put your child before a mouse"...Of course. I'd put MY child before YOUR child, my Mum before yours. However putting children before mice or Mums before dogs doesn't actually cure anyone. It just makes us desperate and sad. We are all going to die. I hope I die at peace and not ripping open beagles looking for an evasive cure.
04:43 PM on 03/14/2012
I do find it more than a little amusing to hear someone in the house of lords complaining about 'Choking off' I thought they were all into that sort of thing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
04:30 PM on 03/14/2012
Using animals for research is unneccessary in this day and age and really only profit the people who breed and trade in them.
04:23 PM on 03/14/2012
Just in case anyone actually believes Lord Drayson when he talks about: "small in number, animals such as mice"
Lets be clear. Here are the home offices FACTS.
"In the UK, Home Office figures show that 3.2 million procedures were carried out in 2007, a rise of 189,500 since the previous year. Four thousand procedures used non-human primates, down 240 from 2006. A "procedure" refers to an experiment that might last minutes, several months, or years. Most animals are used in only one procedure: animals either die because of the experiment or are euthanized afterwards."

So, yes, that is a 'few mice'. And a few million assorted animals including FOUR THOUSAND of our closest living relatives being used for the most sickening experiments, mostly brain experimentation, usually including deliberate damage or partial disection. Don't believe me, LOOK INTO IT. These 'scientists' might wear lab coats and look like 'doctors', but they do things that would make the Cenobites in Hellraiser lose their lunch.

Lord Drayson's comments are misleading propaganda at best! He'd have you believe that anyone opposed to this sickening abuse of living creatures is some kind of extremist! What absolute rubbish.
04:13 PM on 03/14/2012
In an ideal world there would be no need for animal testing in the first place. In terms of medicines I accept is is currently necessary (as testing on humans is banned by international covenant) but cosmetic testing I completely oppose, for the record. The point about animal rights groups 'choking' the industry is not too likely however as the main subjects are available to be bred in the UK and even in the labs directly.

I just hope that sooner rather than later they can clone/create human tissues to test on.
04:38 PM on 03/14/2012
You make a good point and these comments by Drayson are really just a smoke screen.
The Labour administration went on a crusade against the animal rights movement and 'for' the vivisection industry. Clearly Drayson is worried that even the Tories won't be as rabid in their defence of this profitable bloody business.
04:10 PM on 03/14/2012
Does Lord Dyson have a vested interest in animal research anyway? There is a huge amount of research being done by people such as the Humane Research Trust without the use of animals. Many people believe that animal research is actually a hindrance rather than a help to the advance of science and the Humane Research Trust alone has many supporters. Prevention is better than cure anyway so perhaps a healthy lifestyle is the cure for many ailments. Also, it was interesting that this article came out on the same day as three horses were killed at the Cheltenham Racing Festival. People who objected to this carnage were also called 'animal rights extremists'. The racing organisers said that they were concerned for the safety and welfare of horse. Yeah right and money doesn't come into the equation at all? Wonder if I was a religious extremist whether they would dare to call me a religious rights extremist?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
04:38 PM on 03/14/2012
Completely agree, fanned and faved.
03:47 PM on 03/14/2012
Well lets stick him in a cage and use him and see how he feels.
02:38 PM on 03/14/2012
"...and more people "will suffer and die" because airlines and ferry companies are refusing to bring animals into the country for testing..."

Well Lord Drayson, then why don't you siphon some of the money your nation uses to find new ways to kill people, and put THAT money into new ways to STOP suffering and dieing?!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:56 PM on 03/14/2012
Has anyone here ever done pre-clinical drugg development ... other than myself?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
levelshot
I lack the capacity and ability to believe b.s.
01:41 PM on 03/14/2012
teastooges are up for the job. Hell they do it for hotdogs, popcorn, salted peanuts and VHS set of tebow's greatest tebowing moments.
01:36 PM on 03/14/2012
Lord Drayson should be ashamed for uncritically spouting such industry propaganda. As a Member of the House of Lords he has a responsibility to get his facts straight when speaking on important policy issues. Those responsibilities are substantial, given that around 3.6 million animals are used annually in UK laboratories, and that thousands of patients await cures for debilitating diseases. These people need research that will truly benefit them, and an almost overwhelming body of large-scale systematic reviews published in the scientific literature has demonstrated that animal experiments actually contribute very little to human healthcare advancements. I suggest he read my 2011 book, 'The Costs and Benefits of Animal Experiments' (http://www.andrewknight.info/publications/book/book.html), which is the most evidence-based examination of this issue published to date, before making such claims in the future.

Andrew Knight DipECAWBM(AWSEL), PhD, MRCVS, FOCAE
Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thismortalcoil
Science is the poetry of reality
01:41 PM on 03/14/2012
Well said, you have your first fan!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:59 PM on 03/14/2012
"... and an almost overwhelming body of large-scale systematic reviews published in the scientific literature has demonstrated that animal experiments actually contribute very little to human healthcare advancements. "

---------------------

This is nonsense !
04:23 PM on 03/14/2012
You're clearly unfamiliar with the science. I suggest you peruse the studies at http://www.animalexperiments.info. If you actually have evidence or reasoning to refute their findings, I suggest you subject it to peer review. If it's not found wanting by experts in the field, it will be published - as have all these studies of which you appear unaware, but with which you nevertheless appear, in your ignorance, to disagree.
01:26 PM on 03/14/2012
While I completely support medical research I think it is unfair to label animal rights activists as 'extremists'. We have increasing evidence of animal consciousness and this calls for a re-assessment of the way we treat animals. I was watching a debate on animal reason with the UK top scientists/philosophers etc - It is a must see for those interested in these issues: http://iai.tv/video/animal-reason