Barry Brooks Jailed For 'Horrific' Child Abuse Images

Posted: 16/03/2012 20:04 Updated: 16/03/2012 20:04   PA

Barry Brooks Jailed
Barry Brooks Jailed For 'Horrific' Child Abuse Images

A registered sex offender has been jailed for eight months after "horrific" images of child abuse were found on his computer.

Unemployed Barry Brooks had already received a police caution for possession of indecent images of children in 2009 when he was arrested following an intelligence-led investigation by the Paedophile On-Line Investigation Team (POLIT) of Sussex Police.

The 63-year-old, of Chiltern Drive, Hastings, East Sussex, pleaded guilty to 11 counts of making indecent images of children, four of possession of extreme images, and four of possessing a banned image of a child and was jailed at Hove Crown Court on Friday.

He was also given a Sexual Offences Prevention Order (SOPO) and he will be on the sex offenders register for 10 years when he leaves prison, a Sussex Police spokesman said.

Brooks is not believed to have contacted any children and none of the children in the images are believed to be from the Hastings area, he added.

Recorder Simon Crookenden QC described the images as "horrific" as he sentenced Brooks.

Detective Constable Jackie Keogh, from Sussex Police, said: "There was no evidence that Brooks had shared the images with anyone else, but it has to be remembered that every such image is of a child being abused, and every acquisition of them via the internet simply encourages their continued existence and supply.

"In this case we were particularly concerned that Brooks already had a previous police caution for possession of indecent images of children in 2009, and was therefore a registered sex offender at the time of his latest offending.

"In this current case he had more than 1,500 indecent images of children, including some exceptionally serious ones.
"We will continue to follow up all such reports and to bring offenders before the courts whenever possible."

Jon Brown, head of strategy for sexual abuse at the NSPCC, said: "We would echo the point made by the police that whilst he did not contact or abuse children himself, each photograph represents a terrible act and the ultimate betrayal of trust between an adult and a child.

"Each time someone views a child abuse image they add to that act and encourage it to happen again in the future.

"Whilst within the guidelines, many people will still question if eight months is a sufficient sentence for such a serious crime.

"This was a second offence so he clearly has not been prepared to change his behaviour and must receive treatment to ensure he is not a risk to children on his release. He must also be monitored and never allowed to work with children."

FOLLOW UK

Filed by Lucy Sherriff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
22:59 on 17/03/2012
Why was this on the front page of Huffington?

I hope you haven't hired someone who worked for News of the World.
18:06 on 17/03/2012
Britain has become a joke, what is the point in keeping vermin like him alive, he should be got rid of, we have no deterrant, after enjoying his time inside with the other weirdos, swapping stories and where to get the best pictures from, he will no doubt be given a new identity, new home and a computer to play with, he must not be denied his human rights, but is he human? I say no, so stamp on him and bury him alive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daviejohn
All the world's a stage,
12:56 on 17/03/2012
Eight Month's, EIGHT MONTH's !! this evil slimy toe rag of a man deserved 10 years ant least. I agree with other posters, chemically castrate the man.
12:52 on 17/03/2012
it's disgusting - he should be off the streets and banged up. But why mention that he was unemployed - what has that got to do with it? Fred West and Ian Huntley worked - it doesn't make them model citizens!
12:37 on 17/03/2012
I'm hoping that 'Jail Justice' gets him
12:14 on 17/03/2012
It appears the worse the crime the smaller the sentence. 8 months is no sentence for this type of crime it should be a lot longer. I would give him a suspended sentence, suspended with a rope around his neck and his toes off the ground for 8 minutes.
11:38 on 17/03/2012
castrat him
11:32 on 17/03/2012
what a deterrent,8 months,probably reduced to 4 months,in a prison not very different to a 2 star hotel,where he will be with housed with other nonces,for his own safety,fed 3 times a day,where he can relax,put his feet up and plan what sick things to do when he gets out,british justice,laughable
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicholspongo
10:16 on 17/03/2012
Only a couple of words ''SICK AND DISCUSTING''
Makalha
Opinions are not facts.
10:02 on 17/03/2012
How come only a police caution the first time and then only 8 months sentence ? Unbelievable !!
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
12:14 on 17/03/2012
It certainly is!!! Almost an invitation to carry on and abuse more children, Pity we can't just hang him and be done.
katertaif
My wife thinks I have one fault. Everything I do!
09:21 on 17/03/2012
Pervert doesn't even begin to describe it. Any man (or woman for the matter of that) who could get any kind of pleasure out of seing a child abused in any way, never mind the abuser themselves has to be insane, surely they could not do it while in their right minds. I can't even imagine anyone taking a picture of it. Then to be given an 8 month sentence is a damning indictment of our so called system of justice. He'll be out in four, or possibly even earlier if he says he's sorry. What of the mental prison the children who are abused are in? will they be out and free of trauma in four months? Surely the sentence should be far more severe. Taken that they are insane. Either they can be made well again, or they can't, If they can, They surely would be so disgusted at what they did, they couldn't live with themselves, and if they can't they are always a danger to children. Either way a long long sentence is called for.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christos Palmer
Χριστός Παλμερ
03:55 on 17/03/2012
8 months, what a joke!
This comment has been removed.