Falkands Row: Navy Visit Cancelled By Peru In 'Solidarity' With Argentina

Posted: 20/03/2012 08:11 Updated: 20/03/2012 08:55   PA

Hms Dauntless

A visit by a Royal Navy frigate to Peru has been cancelled by the hosts in a display of solidarity with Argentina over the Falklands.

HMS Montrose was due to visit the country later this week but the Peruvian government has withdrawn its welcome for the ship.

Foreign minister Rafael Roncagliolo told Peru-based news agency Andina:

"This decision has been taken in the spirit of Latin American solidarity commitments undertaken in the framework of Unasur (Union of South American Nations) with regard to the legitimate rights of Argentina in the sovereignty dispute over the Falkland Islands, South Georgia and South Sandwich Islands and the surrounding waters."

The UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said officials could have raised the issue with Foreign Office Minister Jeremy Browne when he visited the country last week.

A spokesman said: "HMS Montrose was scheduled to make a short visit to Peru as part of a routine deployment to the region.

"This was agreed as an act of friendship and cooperation between Peru and the UK.

"Ship visits are a sovereign decision for states, but we regret that Peru has revoked its previous agreement to this visit.

"This is despite the Peruvian government having had the opportunity on Friday to raise any concerns it had about this agreed co-operation."

As Britain and Argentina prepare to mark the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War, Buenos Aires again has its sights on claiming the territory it calls Las Malvinas for itself.

Argentina has accused the UK of "militarising" the dispute by reportedly sending a submarine carrying nuclear weapons to the South Atlantic, something that Britain has not confirmed.

They also objected to the Duke of Cambridge's posting to the Falklands as an RAF rescue helicopter pilot and the deployment to the region of one of the Royal Navy's most modern destroyers, HMS Dauntless.

Last week Argentina threatened to take legal action against British companies involved in oil exploration, a move dismissed by the FCO as "wholly counter-productive".

In turn Britain insists its movements of troops and warships are purely routine, and claims Argentina is trying to impose an "economic blockade" on the Falklands by restricting shipping to and from the islands.

Last month Argentinian president Cristina Kirchner de Fernandez said she was making a formal complaint about the UK's conduct to the United Nations, noting that she would have preferred to see Prince William "in civilian clothes and not in military uniform".

Prime Minister David Cameron responded by saying he believed the UN would back the islands' status as a self-governing British overseas territory and warning that Britain would "defend the Falkland Islands properly".

The FCO spokesman added: "The UK government remains fully committed to the Falkland islanders' right to self determination. This position will not change."

FOLLOW UK

A visit by a Royal Navy frigate to Peru has been cancelled by the hosts in a display of solidarity with Argentina over the Falklands. HMS Montrose was due to visit the country later this week but t...
A visit by a Royal Navy frigate to Peru has been cancelled by the hosts in a display of solidarity with Argentina over the Falklands. HMS Montrose was due to visit the country later this week but t...
Filed by Michael Rundle  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 103
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:20 on 22/03/2012
Time to start selling weapons to Ecuador.
16:08 on 20/03/2012
Probably find that the average Argentian dos'nt care about the Falklands anyway jus that their politicians are in dire straits in the opion poles in Argentina!
17:08 on 20/03/2012
Just out of curiosity what is the current standing for the current administration in Argentina, Just wandering cos i'm interested.
08:41 on 21/03/2012
Probably a bit of Latin macho cahonas b***s**t, and just trying to see how far they can push things internationally, got themselves a woman as president who is not doing to well in the poles, and is doing the look at me i can b*t*h things up down here in the south atlantic while the UK has its eyes on the ball game elsewhere, but we have a sub down there according to the Argies which is pissing them off, so they cannot go around and do some gun boat diplomacy of their own.
15:46 on 20/03/2012
Send pieces of paddington bear to the peruvian government until they back down. Bear blood is on their hands,lol.
photo
Chiefy17242011
Cyber-Nat, Cyber-Democrat
15:31 on 20/03/2012
There's a lot being talked about "we should suspend aid to Peru" and so on.

Say we "cut aid to Peru". DFID claim that Infant Mortality in Peru has fallen from 185 per 100K in 2000 to 103 per 100K in 2009, as a direct result of British NGOs assisted by DFID.

Is it The People of Peru who say, Thanks for helping to reduce infant mortality, now b-off because we support the Argentinians is claiming a set of islands that are about as close to us as they are to the UK ?

Or is it a Government of a small, poor nation looking at larger, comparatively richer neighbours and hoping for some crumbs from the table of a South American Common Market

There are places that we should not be aiding. Why are we giving money to India and China when they both have Nuclear Weapons, Huge Militaries and Space Programmes ?

Fine. Let the Peruvians show their "Latin-American Solidarity". We need to be bigger than that and recognise that even although the United Kingdom is up excrement waterway without boat never mind propulsive mechanism, there are people in this world to whom the few beans that we throw them are literally a matter of life and death.

The Falkland Islanders wish to be British. That is their choice. Nobody is holding a gun to their heads, physically or metaphorically.

The Peruvian Government may not have that luxury in their small, poor nation on a big, poor continent.
15:59 on 20/03/2012
I think you will find it's Argentina that is waving the guns about and holding them against peoples heads!
photo
Chiefy17242011
Cyber-Nat, Cyber-Democrat
16:10 on 20/03/2012
Sorry, I didn't think that I had been that obtuse in making Exactly that point in exactly 250 words. My bad.

However, the Argentinian Guns are not just Physical. They are a Big Fish in a small pond. Peru is a very small fish in the same pond. Smile nicely at Big Fish. Again, I ask, is it poor Peruvian Peasants saying Go Away to the Montrose or is it a Government hoping to gain some crumbs from the table ?

Argentina is not about to invade Peru. They are not about to invade the Falklands either despite the sabre rattling. They would get Very Very Badly Humped and they know it.

They are reduced therefore to using their status as a "major" South American Power to "persuade" their fellow South Americans of the Righteousness of their Cause, because ALL of the South American countries are "liberated" colonies they have a degree of empathy with that case and also a degree of concern that it wouldn't take much for the borders to be closed for a Security Exercise and the Trade to suddenly stop.
15:16 on 20/03/2012
Well i suppose it could be worse, i mean Peru might have been the slightest bit of importance to the UK, luckily it isnt, and its a dump.
14:59 on 20/03/2012
We should suspend all aid and assistance to these countries immediately and oppose any assistance they get through the World Bank and IMF. This is a country that has taken land by force from their neighbours Ecuador so they are in no position to preach.
photo
jrp1947
made you show yourself if you respond, got ya!
14:49 on 20/03/2012
The Falklands have no interest in becoming part of Argentina and this is a pure politicial and economic move by Argentina. The difference is this time they might not catch the British off guard and sink one of their ships but get a a-- whooping of their own when the Brits knock out their ports and capitol. It takes a lot of brass for Argentina to claim islands that do not want to be part of their world from everything I have read. I doubt the rest of South America is going to support Argentina except Chavez if he lives much longer. when you look at the two countries, the rights, and the politics it is easy to see why the islands would rather remain Biritsh.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saint wright
Dyslexic old chippy
14:11 on 20/03/2012
can argies give the country they stole back to the natives and can UK cut all aid to Peru?
13:40 on 20/03/2012
It is unthinkable to pull-out of the Falklands. It was a fantastic victory considering the logistics involved, and some good men were lost fighting for our cause .Forget the banana republics, and the hand-wringing liberals at home. Come to think of it, we could do with acquiring an uninhabited island thousands of miles from Britain to send all the bleating anti-British people, who infest our country. We could call it cloud cuckoo land.
13:37 on 20/03/2012
A move pretty much guaranteed to increase UK prescence in the region, since if ships are denied access to mainland ports, more infrastructure will need to be built in the Falklands to support them....
13:34 on 20/03/2012
If the islands were full of Penguins and Sheep only, and did not have lucrative fishing and possible oil wells then Argentina would not have any interest in the islands whatsoever.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
14:28 on 20/03/2012
...by the same token, are you absolutely sure that Britain would be so interested in an island group populated with only penguins and sheep - if there were NOT vast fisheries and certain oil reserves? the argument goes both ways, you know...
14:57 on 20/03/2012
Oil was discovered five years ago. We've a claim to the islands since the late 18th century and had a settlement there since 1833. And then when the war broke out the islands weren't making any profit and were in a state of decline. But we still went to war for them. And the fact that the islands are a self governing territory means that the majority of money made goes to the islanders not Britain and the same can be said for any profits from the oil. In fact the only real profit the government is going to make from the oil is the money the falklanders give them to pay for their defence. Also just like to point out we have many other overseas territories like the Caymans and Gibraltar that don't have any oil, but were just as commited to their right to self determination as well.
13:21 on 20/03/2012
The whole issue is, at present, a non-issue. I fought in the FI as did some of my friends. 2 of them did not come home and I would feel betrayed if the FI changed hands in my lifetime.
So ... missing out on Peru ... don't cry about it because you havn't missed much. Exactly the same thing happened in about 1986 when I was down there again on the ''peaceful patrol'' The Peruvians cancelled close to the planned visit and instead we got Chile and Ecuador. Using this forum as an advert for joining the RN we also got Panama (1 out off 10) Little Cayman (20 out of 10) and Ft Lauderdale Florida (8 from 10). Times were rough then !!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimbraid1
13:29 on 20/03/2012
Valid comments from someone who has been there done that. Thank you.
13:17 on 20/03/2012
The Argentinian claim on the Faulkland islands is based on the geographical fact that the islands are about 450 miles from the nearest bit of Argentina which is a lot closer than they are to Britain. So the Argis argument is, "this gives them the right of sovereignty". (Britain took the islands from the French by military force some time ago when ships still had sails). The reason all this matters now, is because of oil exploration in the islands territoial waters.

Bearing in mind that oil is going to get scarser and more expensive as time goes on, the Argis are starting to panic. Oil is a major source of employment, wealth and power. They want it for themselves naturally. Being an old hand at the power game, Britain knows that control of this oil resourse will do no harm to our economy in the scheme of things. Do we want to be producers or buyers? And if we don't produce anything, how do we pay it?

It never had much to do with sheep, and the Faulklanders (who are mainly there by choise) are given consideration for reasons of political expediency. Another card of justification to play in the Faulkland debacle if you like. If you beleave Britain should continue to strive to be a MAIN PLAYER in the world, it comes with a cost attached and that could mean military force or at least, the threat of it. That's life and it has always been so.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimbraid1
13:30 on 20/03/2012
correct.
photo
MsBubblyBlonde
Sassy,brassy,kiss my assy.
13:17 on 20/03/2012
This is such a tricky debate,isn't it? On one hand you want what is best for the people of the Falklands but where does it end?
Very similar to the plight of the people that live in Gibraltar.I used to visit there a lot when I lived in Spain.The shopkeepers and residents had small stickers in their windows saying "keep us British". The Spanish police at border control were rude and very dismissive of any British people that drove on or off the island.
I see it causing a lot more trouble before an end is in sight.
23:42 on 21/03/2012
They dare not do a thing, the Spanish know we have an army of lager louts entrenched in their country just waiting for it to kick off.