NHS Budget: Labour Attacks £500m Cut In Planned Spending

Posted: 23/03/2012 21:55 Updated: 23/03/2012 22:01   PA

Burnham

Chancellor George Osborne was accused by Labour tonight of raiding the NHS budget as it emerged that planned spending by the health service has been reduced by £500m.

The move, disclosed in Treasury figures following Wednesday's Budget, follows a £900m underspend in 2011/12, only £400m of which has been rolled over into the 2012/13 budget.

The Department of Health said the underspend was down to greater than expected efficiencies in capital projects, including an IT scheme, but that the coalition's commitment to increase the NHS budget in real terms was still being met.

But shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said the NHS, facing thousands of nursing job losses, was "taking a hit" to help fund the cut in the top rate of income tax for people earning more than £150,000 a year.

"This week we saw the government's true colours: they are handing out tax cuts to millionaires and P45s to nurses," he said.

"The NHS is already suffering as the government holds back billions to pay for their unnecessary top-down reorganisation.

"Now we learn the government is making a further £500m raid on the health budget as thousands of nursing jobs are being axed.

"The government promised any savings would be reinvested in the NHS.

"Now we know the truth - the NHS front line is taking a hit to pay for tax cuts for millionaires."

Nuffield Trust chief economist Anita Charlesworth told the Health Service Journal that savings in the NHS were being used to reduce the deficit.

"The argument for front-loading efficiency plans was to generate money to reinvest in transforming services so that they would be sustainable in later years as the impact of constrained funding started to bite," she said.

"Instead it seems that £500m of the savings are not going to be reinvested in new models of service delivery but will instead be channelled towards central government deficit reduction."

A Department of Health spokeswoman said: "We are meeting our pledge to increase the
NHS budget in real terms - we are investing an extra £12.5bn in the NHS over the course of this Parliament.

"The majority of this year's underspend is from the capital budget - mainly from savings on IT systems.

"We have already transferred the maximum amount of capital budget permitted into next year and used some to fund part of £330m for vital projects across the NHS to benefit patients. £500m represents less than 0.5% the total Department of Health budget."

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Chancellor George Osborne was accused by Labour tonight of raiding the NHS budget as it emerged that planned spending by the health service has been reduced by £500m. The move, disclosed in Treasu...
Chancellor George Osborne was accused by Labour tonight of raiding the NHS budget as it emerged that planned spending by the health service has been reduced by £500m. The move, disclosed in Treasu...
Filed by Michael Rundle  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:44 on 25/03/2012
If it had a £900m underspend then I dont see a budget reduction of £500m as unreasonale when our armed forces are still being sent out with insufficient kit and and equipment, and the emergency services (e.g. Police) having their budgets squeezed.

Im fed up of the NHS being the 'untouchable' political weapon of choice that everyone is scared to touch. This country needs to get real or struggle forever to compete.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Cottrell
14:02 on 24/03/2012
At last, some sembalnce of a fightback on the NHS from Labour's ranks, but the privatization of the NHS won't be defeated by Parliamentary niceties alone. What we can't have is this government creating facts on the ground, in terms of a privatized NHS, then another counterfiet Labour government like Blair's coming along and adapting to the Thtacherite reality. That reality needs to be reversed and only extra parliamentary direct, strikes, and committees of action to coordinate the two can do the job. The Occupy movement shoed the way but is only the beginning. The job of councils of action (that we last saw in France in 1968 and Portugal in 1973) wouldn't simply be to bury the Tories privatizations and bring the government down but serve notice to an incoming Labour government that if this is more business as usual then they get the same treatment.
13:03 on 24/03/2012
Now we know where this extra 10 billion has come from, poor, disabled and the NHS...
10:19 on 24/03/2012
what can you expect when labour thought they had a bottomless pit on which to draw. If MP's are so concerned then they should give up there expense sheet claims and live like the rest of us
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blockem1
When will our politicians start putting policies
08:12 on 24/03/2012
We all have to face facts that while it is difficult to calculate value for money for health care there are billions of savings that can be made without any fall of in standards. Then there is a lot we all can do about obesity ,alcolohisim ,smoking,fitness,diet,etc etc
22:51 on 23/03/2012
Torys putting the squeeze on to make sure their private healthcare sponsors can swoop in, loss lead and undercut the established, but financially starved NHS services. So the coherent integrated service gets choked out of existence and we're left with having to fork out for fragmented and costly private health insurance in 3 years.

Standard behaviour of these one termers, who are clearly screwing the UK for every penny while they have the chance.
08:32 on 24/03/2012
"Standard behaviour of these one termers, who are clearly screwing the UK for every penny while they have the chance. "...

Quit talking about Unemployment Brown, his banking friends and Labour.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janno000
21:35 on 24/03/2012
yes because they won't get another one.