Royal Mail Raises Stamp Prices By 30% Pushing First Class Stamps To 60p

Posted: 27/03/2012 11:20 Updated: 27/03/2012 11:44   PA

Stampprices

First and second class stamp prices are to increase by 14p from next month to record highs of 60p and 50p, the Royal Mail announced today.

Prices will rise from the current 46p and 36p from April 30, while the cost of posting large letters will increase from 75p to 90p for first class and 58p to 69p for second class.

The increases followed a decision by regulator Ofcom to give Royal Mail the freedom to set its own prices.

Royal Mail said that even after the increases, second class stamps will still be the cheapest in Europe while first class will be around average.

The Royal Mail also announced that millions of people on low incomes will be able to buy up to 36 stamps for Christmas at the current price.

The new prices, showing increases of 30% for first class and 39% for second class, follow a huge reduction in the number of letters posted - down from 84 million a day six years ago to 59 million today.

Royal Mail chief executive Moya Greene said: "We know how hard it is for households and businesses when our economy is as tough as it is now.

No-one likes to raise prices in the current economic climate but, regretfully, we have no option.

"Royal Mail provides one of the highest quality postal services in Europe for amongst the lowest prices for both consumers and business.

"That service is under threat from declining volume, e-substitution and ever increasing competition. Because of these pressures Royal Mail has lost £1 billion over the last four years; the sustainability of the service is now at risk.

"Price increases are needed to return the universal service to sustainability."

A Department for Business spokesman said: "Price rises are never welcome. However ministers are clear that the top priority is to protect the universal service on which people rely.

Indeed we have enshrined in law the six day a week, one price goes anywhere service and given Ofcom as the regulator the duty of protecting that service.

"But this service comes at a cost, and its provider, Royal Mail, needs to be financially viable. The most important thing is to secure the universal service, but price rises are only one part of the story, the successful modernisation of Royal Mail is also crucial.

"We welcome Royal Mail's announcement that it will offer discounted stamps to some low-income households this Christmas, helping to reduce the impact on the most vulnerable."

Around five million people on pension credit and employment and support allowance or incapacity benefit will be eligible for the Christmas scheme, offering them the chance to buy up to three books of 12 stamps at 2011 prices.

Ms Greene said the universal service, under which the Royal Mail delivers to any house in the UK for the same price, was in "peril" without higher stamp prices.

"This is a very high quality, cherished service, but it needs to be paid for. The increase will restore our finances and maintain the universal service. We had no alternative but to increase prices."

Ms Greene said research showed the average household spent 50p a week on stamps, so she believed there was no "affordability issue" with higher prices.

Over the last four years, Royal Mail has made a loss in its core mails business, including packets, of almost 31 billion.
It said there had been a "significant deterioration" in its finances, blaming artificially low prices, falling volumes and less mail being delivered to an increasing number of addresses - up from 27 million to 29 million since 2003.

Mail volumes fell by 25% in six years and are expected to decline by around 5% a year for the foreseeable future.

Royal Mail also pointed out that service standards in the UK are "appreciably higher" than in many other EU countries, with deliveries over six days against an EU minimum obligation of five days, and a next-day target of 93%, the highest for any major European country.

The workforce has been cut by 50,000 over the past decade and 16 mail centres have closed.

Ofcom said that, subject to the safeguards it is putting in place, Royal Mail will make decisions on the price of stamps, not the regulator, adding that it had put a cap on the price of second-class stamps for standard letters to protect vulnerable consumers.

Over the next seven years, this will ensure that Royal Mail can price second-class stamps no higher than 55p. The cap will be indexed in line with inflation.

"The central aim of the decisions announced today is to ensure that Royal Mail's universal service obligation (USO) is financially sustainable and provided efficiently.

"Without regulatory changes, there is a risk that Royal Mail may not be able to continue to deliver the USO to the same standard as today," said an Ofcom statement.

Stuart McIntosh, Ofcom's group director of competition, said: "Ofcom's decisions are designed to safeguard the UK's postal service, ensuring it is sustainable, affordable and high quality, to the end of the decade and beyond.

"The measures ensure that Royal Mail's products remain affordable for vulnerable consumers and small businesses."

FOLLOW UK

First and second class stamp prices are to increase by 14p from next month to record highs of 60p and 50p, the Royal Mail announced today. Prices will rise from the current 46p and 36p from April 3...
First and second class stamp prices are to increase by 14p from next month to record highs of 60p and 50p, the Royal Mail announced today. Prices will rise from the current 46p and 36p from April 3...
Filed by Charlie Lindlar  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
21:33 on 27/03/2012
When an E-mail costs nothing. Why would anyone spend 60p on a letter and the more they put up the price the less people will use it. Previous governments have allowed private companies to cherry pick profitable parts of the service and this will see the Royal Mail disappear from our streets in the next 10 years
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
22:49 on 27/03/2012
some people need to

those people should buy their stamps now and buy enough (if they can) to carry them though a good period post inflated prices

they can get their on back

buy stamps with the rate 1st or 2nd on and use them till they have to find another way to communicate

a 1st or 2nd class stamp is still going to be 1st or 2nd class stamp after the price rise
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
19:44 on 27/03/2012
If you want to save agianst the increase

buy you 1st and 2nd class stamps NOW and they will be valid for the duration as long as they do not have the face value on them

A first class stamp will be valid now and until you use it so will second class

If you can afford it and write a lot go out and buy yourself as any as you can they will still be first or second class when you need them

Gauranteed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
19:03 on 27/03/2012
You can thank the previous Labour government and the regulatory body they set up, POSTCOMM for this. POSTCOMM granted licenses for other mail firms to carry mail and dump it on Royal Mail for final delivery. Royal Mail was forced to take that mail at a loss of 2p per item and it lost half of it's business mail to competitors thus half the mail that it once delivered at a profit is now being delivered at a loss. Before Labour and POSTCOMM Royal Mail was able to 'cross subsidise' stamped mail which while it consists of only about 6% of the mail volume, costs the most to handle as it has to be collected from roadside pillar boxes and post offices, even in remote rural areas. The elderly, unemployed and other low-income groups will be able to purchase up to 36 stamps at a discount during the run-up to Christmas.
19:14 on 27/03/2012
It's a dying business. Mostly they are delivering junk mail. Financial incentives are moving people to the internet for billing and statements.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GingerlyColors
No will to change it, no right to criticize it
07:03 on 28/03/2012
I agree that Royal Mail is a dying business but it's decline must be managed with the unions and the management not making rash moves and allow the workforce to be reduced through natural wastage. We don't want to go down the same road as the other industries where the unions hastened their own demise through reckless strike action. Take the coal mines for example. In 1900 a million men worked underground. That figure was some 720,000 (including 48,000 Bevin Boys) in World War II and 250,000 when they brought down the Heath government in 1974. By 1984 there were 170,000 miners but in spite of most of them striking for a year, they had lost their impact and it was not long before nearly all of them ended up on the dole. Some 8,000 people work in coal mining today.
We at Royal Mail must not end up the same way. During our lengthy 2007 pay dispute nobody gave a damn about us being on strike until the run-up to Christmas when there was a threat to the festive mail. At one time a postal strike was a national emergency and it did not take long for the sorting offices to end up looking like something out of a Terry Pratchett novel!
18:34 on 27/03/2012
email, social media, blogs, online forms, do we need to say anymore
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
18:04 on 27/03/2012
With the price of fuel nowadays, one could never drive there or deliver any quicker. We are caught in a trap we will never extricate from...
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
20:06 on 27/03/2012
you can still play them at their own game by purchasing your stamps NOW and they will still be first or second class when you come to use them even if the price has gone up you still get first class at 46p for as long as you have them to use
17:44 on 27/03/2012
Declining use of mail? You aint seen nothing yet Royal Mail!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elizabethjl
17:31 on 27/03/2012
I personally have stopped sending our business mail through the post and email it instead, I wouldn't mind so much if it actually arrived on time, we have to wait until 2pm for business mail to arrive that's if it comes at all, its a bloody joke, when businesses are expecting cheques etc, how on earth do they get to go to the bank by the time it arrives, its ludicrous!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
16:24 on 27/03/2012
I think the price is reasonable. Imagine having to walk all the way say from Cornwall to Scotland with a letter.An e.mail cannot compare to a written letter. And if the price rise helps to keep more people in work,so much the better.
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
16:19 on 27/03/2012
So the Tories try to fatten up the post office for privatisation? Let's see if HMs loyal opposition, the Red-Rose Tory-lite party object I won't hold my breath...........
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
16:17 on 27/03/2012
god help us when the royal mail is privatised

I dread to think what will happen to the service and prices

the law of diminishing returns strikes again
15:20 on 27/03/2012
Absolutely unacceptable. Especially as the royal mail postal service is so bad!
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
16:18 on 27/03/2012
perhaps it would be good to lose the "royal" from the name the moment it is privatised.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
17:16 on 27/03/2012
Actually, I think that the price of stamps is a bargain.

For only 36p (50p next month) you can get a letter with umpteen pages in it all the way from Land's End to John o' Groats in only a day or two.

As for "royal mail postal service is so bad" I must say that I'm always impressed with the speed and accuracy with which they deliver.
lastpost
see biography
14:03 on 27/03/2012
"The increases followed a decision by regulator Ofcom to give Royal Mail the freedom to set its own prices."
Still good value for money though. Why spend pounds complaining to politicians via telephone calls and e-mails? When, for a few pence, its possible to have letters ignored instead.

"We know how hard it is for households and businesses when our economy is as tough as it is now."
So we would encourage them to drop us a line, and express that exasperation. Since one company’s shared problem, is another business’s steady income.

"No-one likes to raise prices in the current economic climate but, regretfully"
pension schemes don’t fund themselves.

"under threat from declining volume"
caused by the cherry picking of profitable sections by the private sector. Coming shortly: See NHS, for more of the same.

"ministers are clear that the top priority is to protect the universal service"
Which could be done, plus return a handsome profit. If the service was permitted, to respond to a demand for provision of all the services that they could handle. Such as optimising web-transactions.

"Over the next seven years"
the system will be run into the ground, so that it can be more easily broken up and picked clean. Thereafter the public will accept what they are given, or do the other thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rrozy2222
do as you would be done by
13:52 on 27/03/2012
Well thats a good advert for email and fax!!
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
16:19 on 27/03/2012
it will be buried in less that three years or at best in administration
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nathan0316
TrueBlueTory Age quod agis
13:00 on 27/03/2012
I wonder how many people will now buy scanners and create email accounts to avoid paying these extra charges?
northern git
fed up with all the political crap in life
16:19 on 27/03/2012
A LOT
KenInd
We too shall get through this.....
12:58 on 27/03/2012
The US postal service is hardly an efficient or profitable agency, but it manages to deliver mail across a country many, many times larger than the UK with fairly efficient regularity.....it is a one class system, where a letter stamp costs a flat $.45, or 28 pence. I would equate the overall service on a par with the UK second class post, with occasional bursts of first class service. It too is under great pressure and I am sure it would like to increase the cost of a stamp by 30%, but it cannot, knowing full well that it will not be sustainable. Both postal services are unionized and both have the same cost constrictions of having to deliver to every address in the respective nations. Why the UK system is so much more expensive is hard to understand, bearing in mind that higher fuel costs are offset by the much smaller geographical distances in the UK. Any suggestions?