Nuclear Power Plans Stall After Energy Companies Back Out

Posted: 29/03/2012 11:49 Updated: 29/03/2012 11:49   PA

Two of the "big six" energy companies have pulled out of developing new nuclear plants in the UK, in what has been described as a "devastating blow" for the government's energy policy.

RWE npower and E.ON said they would not proceed with their "Horizon" project, which looked to develop nuclear reactors at Wylfa in North Wales and Oldbury-on-Severn in Gloucestershire.

The German-owned companies said they were looking for a new owner for Horizon Nuclear Power in the light of a number of considerations, including the global economic crisis and significant costs of the project.

Gary Smith, of the GMB union, said: "This is a devastating blow which leaves the UK Government energy strategy in tatters."

The companies insisted their joint venture company Horizon's development projects were viable for another investor to develop nuclear sites, and confirmed they were committed to investing in energy schemes in the UK.

RWE npower said a strategic review in light of the global economic crisis and the accelerated phase-out of nuclear power in Germany, coupled with significant costs of running the joint venture, had led to the decision while E.ON said its decision had been made against the backdrop of the group's wider financial constraints, but said it would be continuing to invest in Britain.

Volker Beckers, chief executive of RWE npower, said: "We remain convinced that Horizon's development projects represent excellent sites for new nuclear power stations in the UK, and we would like to express our sincere thanks to the Horizon employees for their hard work in bringing the projects to this stage of development.

"We would also like to thank the communities around Wylfa and Oldbury, the business partners we have worked with during development, and everyone who has shown support for our development work.

"It is because of the strength of support for our development work, particularly on the island of Anglesey, that we continue to believe that nuclear power has an important role to play in the UK's future energy mix."

Tony Cocker, chief executive of E.ON UK, said: "E.ON has decided to focus its investment in the UK on other strategic projects that will allow us to deliver earlier benefit for customers and our company, rather than the very long term and large investment new nuclear power calls for.

"Our commitment to the UK remains as strong as ever and as our track record shows, with over £1 billion of investment in the last year alone, we will continue to select the right projects in which to invest."

Responding to the announcement, Energy Minister Charles Hendry said: "E.ON and RWE's withdrawal is clearly very disappointing, but the partners have clearly explained that this decision was based on pressures elsewhere in their businesses and not any doubts about the role of nuclear in UK's energy future.

"The UK's new nuclear programme is far more than one consortia and there remains considerable interest.

"Plans from EDF/Centrica and Nugen are on track and Horizon's sites offer new players an excellent ready-made opportunity to enter the market."

The GMB's Gary Smith said: "It is really bad news in terms of construction jobs and the potential employment that would have been created in the UK manufacturing supply chain.

"New nuclear is an essential component in keeping the lights on in the UK. We can't keep extending the lifespan of existing nuclear stations and renewables cannot fill the gap on their own.

"The government must act, and now. We need an urgent discussion involving government, the industry and unions about where we go from here.

"David Cameron announced a partnership in nuclear with France during a recent visit to Paris. This is nonsense. Britain is going to be a bit player in what is a growing global industry. It simply isn't good enough for government to sit back and hope it's all going to come good.

"We should be looking at trying to create an Airbus in the nuclear industry and not announcing what are meaningless partnerships."

Environmental groups seized on the news as evidence that nuclear power, which provides just under a fifth of UK electricity supplies, was not a viable option for the country's future energy mix.

Greenpeace's policy director Doug Parr said: "The government's energy strategy is crumbling.

"Not even the billions of pounds of taxpayers' money they have offered as incentives to the German and French nuclear industry are enough to make a new generation of power stations economically viable.

"The future isn't nuclear - the future is green.

"The government must now recognise it's high time to invest in making homes energy-efficient and delivering a coherent renewable energy strategy that will provide UK households and businesses with clean, safe and cheaper power that will also create much-needed jobs for the UK economy."

FOLLOW UK

Two of the "big six" energy companies have pulled out of developing new nuclear plants in the UK, in what has been described as a "devastating blow" for the government's energy policy. RWE npower a...
Two of the "big six" energy companies have pulled out of developing new nuclear plants in the UK, in what has been described as a "devastating blow" for the government's energy policy. RWE npower a...
Filed by Charlie Lindlar  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 86
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
05:29 PM on 06/28/2012
I always find your take on eco issues fascinating. I have recently found a great eco resource www.envirocruit.com check it out for great job leads in the environment, renewable energy and clean technology jobs!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
02:16 AM on 04/03/2012
I agree with the Greenpeace assessment for renewable, safe energy investment, which cost less and can be installed much quicker. Price of Wind Lower Than Gas, Hydro in Brazil Auction | Renewable Energy News Article

The Real Economics of the Increasingly Competitive Wind Power Industry
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
08:34 AM on 04/02/2012
German Documentary, former Prime Minister Kan openly talking about the Nuclear Village, the corruption and extortion involved, at minutes 11 and 16

This is the SMOKING GUN

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/04/german-report-on-fukushima-interview.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
09:59 PM on 04/01/2012
Centralized power is a risk.
Decentralized power, such as rooftop PV is a strength, and it is getting really cheap

3 cents per kWH

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/p/renewable-and-energy-efficiency.html
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
05:35 AM on 04/01/2012
Centralized power of any sort is a scam. They convince you you need more and more power. Then they convince you you can't do it yourself. Then they convince you that you will die without them. And they call us the "fearmonger" as if we "monger" "fear" instead of iron or cheese.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:42 AM on 04/05/2012
Offshore wind for coastal cities and community waste bio char bio fuels also see, like a good idea.

Collective ventures are not a bad idea, that's what society is based on.

It just needs to be regulated by an un bought democratic republic, like our Locke liberal founders wanted.

rooftops pv solar and inefficiency are the only tech people can do for themselves, and should.
professor
Correkt the Spelling and Pick on the Moniker
05:32 AM on 04/01/2012
Pronuke tro talking points always always always refuse to address the reality: that an alternative future means a frontal assault of ALL alternative energies, solar only being one, and conservation, also known as efficiency, leading the pack. What will we use at night instead of solar power? All of the other alternative powers. Not that we will need much, our places will be so efficient.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
03:54 AM on 04/01/2012
Solar Power at Night
Solar

Hey If you have to have molten salts to provide 24/7 electricity, wouldn't you rather have them at a solar power plant rather than a Nuke power plant?

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/solar-power-at-night.html
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:16 AM on 04/01/2012
Solar at night and wind when it's calm are just pro fossil and nukes talking points.

The solution is obvious and cost effective:

Waste bio fuels, particularly bio char.

The use our existing peaking generators but clean.

Storage for solar and wind is the great red herring.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
05:28 AM on 04/01/2012
This is storage
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
09:07 PM on 04/01/2012
Got it now, RED HERRING
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
03:54 AM on 04/01/2012
Cute dogs are the opposite of nuke

http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/humans-are-control-freaks.html
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:34 AM on 03/31/2012
Good news.

Here's some more news Huff didn't think we would want to comment on:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120328/eu-bulgaria-nuclear-plant/
Bulgaria scraps plan for second nuclear plant

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20120329/as-japan-nuclear-tepco/
Japan nuke operator seeks more public funds

The world finally sees nukes for the cancer and deaths they are.

Wind and waste are half the costs of nukes, and waste bio fuels provide all the backup solar and wind need to supply power 24/7.

Forever, clean, safe and cheaper.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
01:21 AM on 03/31/2012
A hydroelectric fuel cell invented in Vietnam promises to open an era of inexpensive, renewable energy. The fuel is fresh or salt water. It is scheduled to go on sale there in June. A 2,000 watt generator is priced at $1,600.

See Cheap Green at www.aesopinstitute.org

And the opening page of that site outlines why no more nuclear plants should be built.

Many existing plants can meltdown in the aftermath of a solar storm that collapses critical power grids. A shockingly likely scenario.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Norman Mitchison
12:05 PM on 03/30/2012
Wind turbine companies please note and follow suit.
11:24 AM on 03/30/2012
Interesting to hear all the comments regarding the latest stall on nuclear energy. I still believe nuclear does and will have a large part to play in the UK energy systems. We cannot rely solely on generating renewable energy to meet our energy demands and will require a mix of strategies.

Matt @ Energy Jobline
www.energyjobline.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mickbono
huff is crap
09:31 AM on 03/30/2012
watch the fields near you. wind farms will be steamrollered through now on the pretense that they are a good thing & will solve our energy problems.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
06:55 AM on 03/30/2012
Nuke makes no sense from an economic viewpoint.

It costs around $15B to build a modern nuke plant, and takes about 10 years.

Investors want a 10% or even 20% annual rate of return in general, maybe on something super safe and reliable they would be willing to receive 7%.

But with nuke, picture that at year 5 you have the heavy infrastructure in place, much of the big money spent, say $10B,

At that point investors would want at least $1B minimum a year, and yet you have to wait 5 more years to get anything........more here
http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/2012/03/nuke-makes-no-economic-sense.html
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:24 AM on 04/01/2012
Go that right. Here in the USA, we have to give reactor 500M$ per year per reactor just so they can compete! fanned.

rooftop pv solar is cheaper here than nukes, offshore wind and waste bio fuels are half that, and efficiency is half that again.

When I was last in the UK,m they desperately need more efficiency.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
oahutrading
05:29 AM on 04/01/2012
Japan too, they are still loaded with T12 lamps
02:11 AM on 03/30/2012
Gangsters! not only are they ripping off consumers these foreign power companies want to rob the government by forcing huge subsidies. Renationalise the power industry UK Power PLC, Power to the people and for the people.