40 Days For Life Anti-Abortion Vigil Meets Noisy Counter Protest From Pro-Choice Activists (PICTURES)

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 31/03/2012 14:09 Updated: 3/04/2012 11:06

It is 7:30pm on Friday and Christina is kneeling down to pray. To her right, a group of around 500 noisy protesters, armed with whistles, glow sticks, drums and “keep your rosaries off my ovaries” signs are interrupting with a chorus of “sit down if you hate women”.

Baker, six months pregnant and accompanied by her 13-year-old brother Lorenzo, is undeterred. She’s at the 40 Days for Life prayer vigil outside the British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), the UK’s largest abortion provider’s headquarters in Bedford Square, central London.

“If you are anti-abortion you should stand up for voiceless children,” she says. “I’m standing up for babies.”

“The trouble is the media is so pro-choice. At 12 weeks a baby is fully formed.”

As for the noisy counter-protest, it makes her feel "sick".

“It’s disgusting,” she says. “I don’t hate women… I am one at the end of the day."

Christina and around 300 others were there to see Alan Hopes, the Auxiliary Bishop of Westminster, who attended the prayer vigil.

Commenting afterwards, Hopes said he was there to stand up against the “culture of death”.

“The large number of people who attended the prayer vigil shows that increasing numbers are opposed to our society’s culture of death and are horrified that in 2010 almost 190,000 abortions took place in England and Wales.”

Kate Smurthwaite, vice chair of pro-choice group Abortion Rights, says she is concerned about a mainstream bishop supporting an "extremist" group.

"We think of 40 Days for Life as being an extremist OTT group," she says. "They would hold up graphic images and engage in tactics that I would never pursue whatever my opinions were.

"They think it’s acceptable to harass individual women, making very difficult situations immeasurably worse. The reason everyone was there is they were being joined by one of the leading Catholic bishops in London, someone who has regular meetings with politicians and is seen as a community leader.

"That’s terrifying to me. They've been filming women coming in and out of clinics, shouting at women. When I got here I was filled with incandescent rage that these people would stand outside a clinic and hold a religious service there.”

She and fellow pro-choice picketers banged drums, blew whistles, and chanted “shame on you” and “stop harassing women” to promote their cause.

Why? Because 40 Days has been accused of filming women entering abortion clinics, handing out incorrect information and harassing women during their prayer vigils outside BPAS.

Paul, a 29-year-old Catholic, says he was told by 40 Days to put his camera away at Friday’s protest because of accusations that the group had been filming women outside clinics. “I see women outside abortion clinics,” he says. “It’s a cliché but some are literally being dragged in by their partners. A lot of people feel they have no choice.”

But the allegations about 40 Days for Life were dismissed by Robert Colquhoun, one of the founding members of the organisation in Britain, who says he knew “God was calling me” to support the group. “We don’t encourage anyone to film," he says. “We’re here to pray for an end to abortion. Our campaign is focusing on prayer.”

So what does he think of the protesters? “The protesters range from rude to the aggressive behaviour we’ve seen on display tonight,” he replies.

Alfonso, another 40 Days for Life member, takes a different view. “The protest is good. Our campaign is working. We’re making them nervous.”

Those praying for an end to abortion at the event range from nuns to priests to young Catholics.

Nineteen-year-old Jo has done “sidewalk counselling” before, talking to women as they head into abortion clinics.

“Women don’t know what abortion is. I don’t think women are made aware,” says Jo. “Abortion is the termination of a human life.”

Jo is with her friend, 14-year-old Declan, whose views are clear. “We’re standing up for what’s right. Abortion is murder,” he tells me.

Then there’s Dr Christian Shell, proudly holding a sign picturing a foetus with the slogan ‘you take away my choice’ in capital letters; and Paulo Manca, who has brought eight of his 13 children along, including his four-year-old daughter. Is she pro-life? “She couldn’t have a conversation with you about it,” says Shell.

At the pro-choice protest, separated by a metal barrier, the attendees are just as diverse. London’s critical mass group rides past to show their support, with the Green Party’s London mayoral candidate Jenny Jones also in attendance. Jones says she’s “concerned” about any threat to the right to abortion.

Despite minor skirmishes, there’s no real trouble. The prayers end and the protests finish, but the policemen remain until the very end. “We don’t get any trouble from this lot,” says one officer. A pro-choice protester agrees, remarking as she leaves: “It’s just a stand-off really.”

So what's next? Smurthwaite says this is just the start.

“This is the beginning I think of US-style tactics coming to the UK,” she says.

“I really hope they’ll be less successful here. Last night there were lots of Catholics on our side. They don’t even represent the mainstream when it comes to their religion. Friday’s protest was the biggest pro-choice one in my activist life-span.”

FOLLOW UK

It is 7:30pm on Friday and Christina is kneeling down to pray. To her right, a group of around 500 noisy protesters, armed with whistles, glow sticks, drums and “keep your rosaries off my ovaries”...
It is 7:30pm on Friday and Christina is kneeling down to pray. To her right, a group of around 500 noisy protesters, armed with whistles, glow sticks, drums and “keep your rosaries off my ovaries”...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 72
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:16 PM on 04/07/2012
I've tried to respond to Michael Pawlovski's irrelevant & ill-tempered reaction to my comment on him, but received a message that I was "trying to respond to a comment that had been removed". This is drivel; Huffpost, could you get it right for once?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:24 PM on 04/05/2012
Gillans, - glad you take seriously these vital questions. Today's culture of death in British and much of Western society will be viewed with incredulity by future generations - how could we abort a fifth of all children conceived? How did we justify perpetrating such wrong in a so-called civilised society? Whose morality was being applied?

Such questions the abortion industry do not want asked - hiding under a cloak of "choice" - hence the indignation as the government "dares" to scrutinise their questionable activity by deploying the CQC!
01:12 PM on 04/05/2012
I've replied (twice) to Catriona, but I don't see my response. It was:
So?
Some day, you too may learn to make comments that are relevant.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:55 PM on 04/04/2012
Sorry, the link below needed a comma removing - it should work now!

http://www.orwelltoday.com/babyub.jpg
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 PM on 04/04/2012
Sorry all, the link below had an extra comma - this one works!

http://www.orwelltoday.com/babyub.jpg
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:30 PM on 04/04/2012
Alarmist comments by Ms Smurtwaite are no surprise - people protesting for justice for the weakest in society will always make those promoting the culture of death anxious.

The babies pictured in these links are of a gestational age less than that at which British law allows abortion (don't worry, nothing "graphic" apart from how beautiful they are):

http://www.orwelltoday.com/babyub.jpg,
http://patcegan.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/baby-in-womb-5-months.jpg

As you can see they are human, and, unless killed, would stand as good a chance as any of us as reaching a healthy and happy old age. What right do the abortionsits have to impose their morality on them?
10:21 AM on 04/03/2012
Why do you describe the pro-abortion demonstrators as "pro-choice"? Abortion eliminates choice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:43 AM on 04/03/2012
More correct terms for them - take your pick - would be "Pro-abortion", "Pro-death" or "Anti-life".
02:13 PM on 04/03/2012
How about anti-choice?
04:44 PM on 04/02/2012
Why don't you allow free speech on this blog?
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
02:58 AM on 04/02/2012
The Brits aren't going to fall for this. We're just not that superstitious.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:56 AM on 04/02/2012
You might be surprised - after all, the Brits did step in and do the right thing to end the last Holocaust during WWII
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
01:32 PM on 04/02/2012
What the hell are you going on about?
07:03 PM on 04/30/2012
Superstitious! Believing that a human fetus "magically" turns into a person, worthy of human rights as it exits the birth canal, is the height of modern superstition!!
02:24 AM on 04/01/2012
“This is the beginning I think of US-style tactics coming to the UK,”

I hope that doesn't include how such extremist organisations in the US blow up abortion and family planning clinics and murder doctors. What the debate in the UK needs isn't Americanisation.

I am pro-choice and believe in a right for a person to have complete control over their reproductive systems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:16 PM on 04/01/2012
You are right - no extremist tactics here, thanks.

Huffpost have reported this pretty fairly, emphasising the peaceful nature of the prayer vigil crowd. I was there - a couple of additional points do need making, though:
- Some critical mass cyclists joined in the pro-life prayers
- At the end of the evening there was intimidation of vigil families quietly praying with young children, by the Anti-life mob, who also persistently encroached threateningly against them. No "real trouble", as the article says, but cowardly and unpleasant nonetheless.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:05 AM on 04/02/2012
Sorry to come back again - you say you are "pro-choice".

Of course, you are very selective in your championing of "choice", I have to presume.
Do you consider whether the thousands of children condemned to a horrendous death by abortion would have chosen such an end?
Under the circumstances, a better term would be "pro-abortion" "pro-death" or "anti-life"
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
12:19 AM on 04/01/2012
I guess no booming voice came from the clouds telling the prayers how right they are?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:39 AM on 04/01/2012
No.

Logic and basic human ethics did that, thanks. Stopping killing the defenceless, either for profit or for spurious "choice" reasons - it's a bit of a no-brainer.

It is so obviously wrong.
12:22 PM on 04/01/2012
If you're against abortion, it's simple - don't do it. The moment you presume to foister your moral code onto others, against their will, I'm afraid it is you who is 'so obviously wrong'!
09:44 PM on 03/31/2012
So are all pro-lifers vegetarian? Is there a difference between a slaughtered lamb/pig which has been born and a foetus? For me the lamb is more sentient but I would like to hear from a pro-life carnivore.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:53 PM on 04/01/2012
Not sure how relevant your post is, Tim.

On the other hand, please see the link below about an abortionist who is alleged to eat fetuses, and try googling "pepsi and fetuses" to find out how fetal cells are being used by big business!
Makes the vegetarian question look a bit lame.
http://thedaleygator.wordpress.com/2012/03/29/shocking-discovery-with-cannibal-abortion-doctor/
Southern law girl
Researching my viewpoint....
09:21 PM on 03/31/2012
In a recent Court hearing, a Judge referred to the illegal killing of a woman and her unborn CHILD.
I don't believe in abortion, but I also recognise some women are faced with the most dreadful of decision, especially if their life is at risk to continue with the pregnancy. I certainly do not view abortion as an alternative to birth control, that should be banned. However, the Judge in this case referred to the foetus as a child!
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
06:44 PM on 04/02/2012
This is Britain. Religion is considered a deeply personal thing here. It is not at all unusual for people who are very close friends to not have a clue what religion - if any - their friends are. Under these circumstances, the government does not consider religion, but allows people the freedom to make their own decisions according to their conscience, working out what would be right, just and moral for them.

Whether or not you believe in abortion is relevant only to you. My beliefs are relevant only to me, and to some degree, to my family.

As for some judge somewhere referring to a foetus as a CHILD, that is a matter of semantics. If I were in the early design stage of a brilliant no-holds-barred house, my old friend Southern Law Girl might meet me for coffee, and ask, 'Tell me all about your new HOUSE!' when, in fact, at that stage, the HOUSE is no more than some preliminary architect's sketches. It's the way we use language.
Southern law girl
Researching my viewpoint....
06:42 AM on 04/03/2012
Good Morning, I live in Britain too!
In law, and when judges make decisions and judgements, word meaning is everything, that is the whole point, a judge is there to make decisions, that is the very nature of his job.
Best wishes!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:56 PM on 04/03/2012
Agreed - religion is personal, but it is incorrect to say that the government - the law -allows people the freedom to make their own conscience-based decisions and always to act on them on the basis of "what would be right for them".

The law has as one of its main roles the protection of the weak in society from the depradations of the strong. This is irrespective of whether a murderer, for example, feels it is right for him/her to kill.

The law presently allows abortion in closely defined conditions under the 1967 Abortion Act. It remains illegal under the earlier "Offenses Against the Person Act" unless those conditions are met.

Currently the law is being applied very loosely, but there is some evidence that this is being tightened and will help protect the weakest in the human family.
This comment has been removed.
06:04 PM on 03/31/2012
As I cannot get to the prayer vigil I will pray alongside them in spirit. To all you who say every female has the right to abot her baby I say well 50% of the abortions are likely to be female what about their right.
To the thugs threatening the anti abortion group I ask "What is your mother aborted you where would you be able to voice you opinion now?
06:29 PM on 03/31/2012
The aborted foetus has no say in this debate. Abortion is today's most pressing civil rights issue. The sacredness of all human life is to be cherished.
This comment has been removed.