Falklands: Government Condemns Attack On Buenos Aires British Embassy

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  By   |  Posted: 3/04/2012 07:47 Updated: 3/04/2012 07:47

The government has condemned violent protesters who attacked the British Embassy in Buenos Aires on the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War.

Several hundred demonstrators pelted police officers with homemade fire-bombs and threw rocks and flaming bottles towards the embassy as a series of events were held in both Argentina and the UK yesterday to commemorate the 1982 conflict.

Television footage showed riot police using a water cannon to disperse the group of extremists who had earlier set fire to a Union Jack flag and an effigy of the Duke of Cambridge in protest against the British rule of the islands.

The violence came after Argentina's president Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner stoked the diplomatic battle between Buenos Aires and London by describing the UK's control over the Falkland Islands as unjust.

However, David Cameron said he remained committed to upholding British sovereignty over the territory and insisted that the islanders must be allowed to choose their nationality status.

Argentina's complaints - including to the United Nations - of "militarisation" by the UK will be heightened by the deployment tomorrow of the Navy's most advanced warship for its maiden operation.

Destroyer HMS Dauntless will set sail from Portsmouth for the Falklands in what the The Ministry of Defence says is a "pre-planned and routine" six-month deployment in the South Atlantic.

It comes after Argentinian hackles were raised by the "provocative" six-week deployment of Prince William to the islands as an RAF search and rescue helicopter pilot.

The Foreign Office condemned "the violent actions of a minority" following yesterday's demonstration.

It said in a statement: "All states are obliged under the Vienna Convention to provide appropriate protection for foreign diplomatic missions.

"We expect the Argentine Government to continue to fulfil its obligations under the convention and continue fully to enforce the law against any demonstrators committing criminal acts."

A total of 255 UK serviceman were killed in retaking the remote South Atlantic islands, while 649 Argentinians lost their lives in the conflict.
In the UK, war widows attended a service of remembrance at the National Memorial Arboretum's Millennium Chapel to mark the 30th anniversary. A single candle was lit and will be left alight for the 74 days of the conflict.

In Argentina however Kirchner used the commemorations to make a renewed push to wrest back control of the islands, describing Britain's stance as "ridiculous and absurd".

"It is unjust that, in the 21st century, there are still colonial enclaves such as the one we have here a few kilometres away. There are only 16 such colonial enclaves in the world, 10 of which are British," she said.

She called for talks on ending the "unjust" situation - something London has ruled out for as long as no change is demanded by the islanders themselves.

Cameron - who like Kirchner included the enemy dead in his anniversary message - insisted Britain was no less committed now than in 1982 to protecting the right to self-determination.

"Britain remains staunchly committed to upholding the right of the Falkland Islanders, and of the Falkland Islanders alone, to determine their own future," he said.

"That was the fundamental principle that was at stake 30 years ago: and that is the principle which we solemnly re-affirm today."
It was, he said, "a day to remember all those who lost their lives" on both sides as well as to "salute the heroism of the Task Force" sent to correct a "profound wrong".

His words were echoed by Defence Secretary Philip Hammond - who also dismissed warnings from former military chiefs that the UK would be unable to defend the islands from a new invasion.

"We will defend them robustly, we have the assets, the people, the equipment in place to do so," he said in response to comments by the man who led the task force, Admiral Sir John Woodward.

The lack of an aircraft carrier would make a repeat impossible, the ex-Navy chief told The Times.

Hammond noted however that there was "not the slightest intelligence to suggest that there is any credible military threat to the Falklands".

Spurred on by the discovery of oil reserves off the Falklands, Ms Kirchner has spearheaded an intense reassertion of Argentina's claim over what it calls Las Malvinas.

It has secured the support of other South American countries for a ban on Falkland-flagged ships in their ports and is seeking to restrict flights as part of an economic squeeze.

At the weekend, it threatened legal action against British and American banks involved in advising UK companies exploring for oil.

Foreign Secretary William Hague, who has led a push to improve UK trade and other links with South America, described Argentina's recent aggressive actions as "deeply regrettable".

FOLLOW UK

The government has condemned violent protesters who attacked the British Embassy in Buenos Aires on the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War. Several hundred demonstrators pelted police officers w...
The government has condemned violent protesters who attacked the British Embassy in Buenos Aires on the 30th anniversary of the Falklands War. Several hundred demonstrators pelted police officers w...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 140
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
08:32 AM on 04/04/2012
The Falklands War included the interests of a third power, the Vatican, whose role tends to be overlooked with the passing of time.

The first papal visit to Britain had been arranged well in advance and took place thirty years ago in the midst of the Falklands War that had erupted between Britain and Catholic Argentina. The Vatican was compelled by political necessity to follow the British visit with a hastily arranged papal visit to Argentina, otherwise it risked undermining its Latin American base.

The cooperation of the murderous military junta that ruled Argentina from 1976 to 1983 was needed for the latter visit. Suggestions that the Pope cold shouldered the junta during the visit do not match the facts. Two particular photos that appeared in the Catholic press at the time are of particular interest in this regard.

These photos are to be found in an article about this fascinating chapter in papal history that reveals a great deal about the Vatican’s modus operandi in modern times —

http://www.wallsofjericho.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=68
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:03 AM on 04/04/2012
I do not understand Kirchner's logic, she states that the Argentinian people were forced to do things against their will by the Argentinian military junta at the time of their invasion of the Falkland islands, under this rule the Argentinian people suffered for years. Why is she now wanting to act like the junta she condemns and force her will on the people of the Falklands islands.
This comment has been removed.
06:18 PM on 04/03/2012
Argentina is on the verge of an economic collapse, so the president of Argentina is trying to stir emotions over the Falklands.
http://www.gringolandiasantiago.com/2012/03/26/if-kids-are-the-future-what-is-argentina-doing-for-them/
This comment has been removed.
06:00 PM on 04/03/2012
The argument that the Falklands are nearer to Argentina than the UK, so it must be Argentinian is flawed. Portugal is welded to Spain, Germany to Belgium etc etc. The Canaries are nearer to Morroco than Spain. The neighbours have no claim over them, so vicinity is a stupid argument.
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
05:54 PM on 04/03/2012
We would be hard pushed to defend the Falkland Isles now anyway.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:46 PM on 04/03/2012
Against the combined forces of South America?

Definitely.

Against the military of Argentina?

The forces based at RAF Mount Pleasant would almost certainly be enough to repel any invasion force got together at short notice by Argentina.
This comment has been removed.
05:36 PM on 04/03/2012
Come on all wake up be grateful that South Georgia administration are trying hard to reduce fishing if all this over fishing goes on end of human race. Nothing to fight over than!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fwdinsight
04:51 PM on 04/03/2012
As usual Argentina is in trouble with 22% inflation and rising. In 2002 it was 41%. Way to take their minds off their own problems. Looking at the Picture of their president holding a map of the Falklands the group surrounding her, had a gramice on their faces.
This comment has been removed.
04:20 PM on 04/03/2012
Screw that lot, we need oil, my Diesel tank is empty. Argentina makes good Corned Beef, crap soldiers and hairy women
04:09 PM on 04/03/2012
I find it puzzling why the British Govt give the Argentinian views any thought time, who in this country really cares what they think?
Why don't they just ignore the comments and let them get on with destroying themselves, if they get as far as the Falklands again then our forces can destroy them again :)
03:37 PM on 04/03/2012
The Argentinians and Falkland folks could leave to go to Europe from where they had come from and hand over to native Indians population because it was their once up on a time? Problem solve, now fight for rights when those rightful owners have no say in this. This is against humanity and their human rights as well.
04:36 PM on 04/03/2012
No native indians ever lived on the Falkland Islands. I believe they did, though, in Argentina.

The rightful owners of the Falklands are already livng there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Annoula
Enough about me!
05:40 PM on 04/03/2012
You are not entirely correct. The islands belonged geographically to Argentina, after declaring independence from Spain. The UK established a British colony in 1833 [illegally, I might add] and the "kelpers" have been living in the islands ever since. All of them are of British descent and none of them seemed interested in becoming anything else, even though they didn't have the right to a UK passport until after the war.
The British occupation was been discussed in the UN for years and years and it was likely that an eventual ruling would be voted in favor of Argentina.
However, the military junta in Argentina decided to "reconquest" the islands in 1982, only to surrender unconditionally after 75 days, and losing all its territorial claims and rights as a result.
The Falklands issue has become a convenient "sovereignty matter" that gets resurrected every few years in Argentina, whenever there are signs of social unrest. They serve to distract the public opinion from the real problems affecting the country like inflation, unemployment, crime, insecurity, corruption etc.
This comment has been removed.
02:44 PM on 04/03/2012
British troops should be on the Mexican border helping America, not fighting over this island. I don't see the logical, practical reason for them being there other than to protect corporate interests. They're there for protecting civil liberties? Freedoms? Rights? Look at Britain.. this damn coalition seems hell-bent on screwing up and destroying those things; perhaps it is a case of people taking one look at Britain and America and thinking well, we're having none of this.
03:58 AM on 04/06/2012
Huh? Why should the UK help the US protect the Mexican border??? Border control in North America isn't *really* of any interest to the UK now is it?
photo
tc-byrne
Victoria Concordia Crescit
01:30 PM on 04/03/2012
Well seeing as Argentina was once an informal part of the British Empire, informal because of the finacial influence Britain had in Argentina's ecomomy, and the fact that English immigrants settle there in the 1820s,and it is well documented the influence the Anglo-Argentinians had in building the infrastructure in the country, the railways, banking, manufacturing, processing plants, not to mention football (the infamous hand of god) ect, we should be allies not enemies,it seem ironic that the same colonialism that help build the country is now unacceptable to this political regime,and the burning of the Union Flag is an insult to our nationality and should be addressed with a formal apology from the Argentinian goverment, but we know that wont happen because they would have to admit their wrong. if they want fishing rights and a share the possible oil deposits that could exist in the Falklands then they should come clean, and not threaten the security and the sovereignty of the Islanders that live there.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fwdinsight
04:47 PM on 04/03/2012
Its called greed. You know the story. The old lady grows old and one family member looked after her. In the will it is discovered she is worth a fortune. Suddenly the family members are incensed they are not included, suddenly remembering all manner of things they did for her even though they ignored her in life.
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.
01:03 PM on 04/03/2012
Burning flags? thats so Middle east. Does anyone want to go into business with me making flame proof US and UK flags?
01:16 PM on 04/03/2012
nah, keep them flammable, sell more that way. ;-)
This comment has been removed.
01:03 PM on 04/03/2012
No doubt a ploy by her supporters to justify her point and to destabalise any sensible argument against her what she says. We could do the same in this country but we would be arrested were in her country they probably on the Payroll
This comment has been removed.