Sherlock Co-Creator Mark Gatiss Hits Out At 'Rubbish Pilot' Rumours

Posted: 4/04/2012 13:10 Updated: 4/04/2012 13:17   WENN

Sherlock co-creator Mark Gatiss has hit out at rumours the show's original pilot was scrapped because it was deemed a "disaster" by TV executives.

The unaired pilot was 30 minutes shorter than the first episode that aired in 2010 and featured a different director, but Gatiss, who also stars in the hit BBC show, insists it was only scrapped because executives wanted to increase the run time.

Gatiss and fellow creator Steven Moffat ended up placing the unseen pilot on the series one DVD to end persistent rumours that it was axed because it was of poor quality.

Speaking on BBC Four series Mark Lawson Talks To, he explains: "The pilot is very good. We would have been very happy (to air it)... We knew we couldn't just bolt on another half hour, so Steve rewrote it and we remade it with a different director.

"Because of an internal decision to make it in another format, this gossip got out. I remember thinking, 'If we don't show people that it wasn't a disaster, this will live with us forever.'

"The argument is that you preserve the final version, sacrosanct, but I thought that was an insult to the original director and the production. The second one is more stylish, but it's a different beast."

A third series featuring Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman is expected next year, DESPITE the video below...

FOLLOW UK ENTERTAINMENT

Sherlock co-creator Mark Gatiss has hit out at rumours the show's original pilot was scrapped because it was deemed a "disaster" by TV executives. The unaired pilot was 30 minutes shorter than the ...
Sherlock co-creator Mark Gatiss has hit out at rumours the show's original pilot was scrapped because it was deemed a "disaster" by TV executives. The unaired pilot was 30 minutes shorter than the ...
Filed by Caroline Frost  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
walkerhds
12:38 PM on 04/05/2012
sorry, but this is a "who cares?" situation. The reboot/reconceptualization worked, and was interesting. Looking forward to season 2 coming to BBC America
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Agnt Duke
Just assume a #sarcasm tag
02:57 AM on 04/05/2012
Why are they critisizing something they've never seen? The final product has been brilliant, so they need to trust they know what they are doing . . . and not blowing smoke about what this other pilot was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OhioPaul
06:22 PM on 04/04/2012
I cannot speak about the original pilot. The show is really brilliant. I myself had imagined it would be some sort of "time travel" or whatever. It is instead about two friends in the 21st century, a doctor who has served in Afghanistan and an eccentric, brilliant man who consults with Scotland Yard. They keep the names. They share a flat on Baker Street. Otherwise, it is 21st century. Crazy as it might appear, the plot really"works".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pali Dumtur
11:35 PM on 04/04/2012
I saw it. It's very similar to the longer version but yes, the longer one is more polished and stylish but that's it. Some people just like to make drama where there's none.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DonnaM777
04:02 AM on 04/05/2012
I agree. And the original Sherlock Holmes was years ahead of it's time in the first place :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaiJi2
06:16 PM on 04/04/2012
More episodes, please!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
02:56 PM on 04/04/2012
I've seen the pilot, it was much weaker. It was from the outset less interesting, it changed considerably, not just in length. The original had none of the animated words representing what Sherlock was reading or thinking, the sound and picture quality was weaker and the camera work was far less dynamic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:06 PM on 04/04/2012
When you compare the pilot to the episode that aired, it, of course, falls way short. Once you've watched the 90 minute episode your expectations are too high for the pilot. On it's own and comparing it to nothing else, it's a very good pilot. Compared to "A Study In Pink" it's slow, awkward and lacking.

They didn't just get a new director - they got a new director of photography, and new product designer (which is why the look is so different). They got very lucky that the BBC wanted to do three 90-min movies instead of a series of 6 hour-long episodes. It afforded Steven Moffat the ability to flesh it out more and cobble together an amazing creative team that makes the show what it is today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
06:20 PM on 04/04/2012
Yes, fair point, I may think differently had I seen the pilot first. However my gut feeling is I would have dismissed the whole show.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pali Dumtur
11:36 PM on 04/04/2012
BBC also gave them more money to shoot the 90 min. episode so they could use different cameras. It seems that they really liked the pilot to invest like that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MancRat
02:25 PM on 04/04/2012
I have to declare an interest as I'm a huge fan.

The pilot episode in the box set shows huge promise but isn't the finished article. It may well have not had the impact that the finished expanded version has, but it isn't a disaster by any means. I like to think that the BBC invested the extra money to re-script and remake the pilot because they also saw the potential of the rebooted Sherlock from that first attempt.

You don't throw good money at a failure. You invest in something like Sherlock if the payoff is there, and it certainly was.