Titanic Anniversary: Crew 'Ignored' Superstitions Before Fatal Voyage

Posted: 5/04/2012 06:18 Updated: 5/04/2012 06:18   PA

Titanic
The Titanic in dock before it set sail on its first, and only, voyage

Passengers and crew of the Titanic ignored a number of maritime superstitions when the ship made its ill-fated maiden voyage, new data analysis has found.

Sailing myths, including the negative presence of women, priests and barbers on board the ship, were ignored, according to family history website findmypast.co.uk.

Superstitious sailors would have been horrified to discover there were 353 female passengers, three barbers, four priests and a monk on board.

Website historian Debra Chatfield said: "The records indicate sailor superstitions were wholly ignored on the Titanic's doomed departure from Southampton.

"Throughout history sailors have been proverbially superstitious, but I bet few ever believed the 'unsinkable' Titanic would succumb to superstition.

"It leaves you wondering whether the cumulative effect of women, priests, dogs, barbers, flowers and red-heads on board - all commonly held superstitions among sailors - angered the sea so much it steered her towards her ill fate."

BLOG: What Happened To My Grandfather After The Titanic Sank

The website is showing the White Star Line officers' books and maritime birth, marriage and death records, alongside other documents from the ship, from next Tuesday.

April 15 will mark the 100th anniversary of the day that the cruiser sank in the north Atlantic following a collision with an iceberg.

Its sinking caused the death of more than 1,500 men, women and children, making it one of the deadliest peacetime maritime disasters in history.

Preview: "Titanic: 100 Year Obsession"
1  of  11
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
Bow railing of R.M.S. Titanic is illuminated by Mir 1 submersible behind the forward anchor crane.

FOLLOW UK

Passengers and crew of the Titanic ignored a number of maritime superstitions when the ship made its ill-fated maiden voyage, new data analysis has found. Sailing myths, including the negative pres...
Passengers and crew of the Titanic ignored a number of maritime superstitions when the ship made its ill-fated maiden voyage, new data analysis has found. Sailing myths, including the negative pres...
Filed by Charlie Lindlar  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:42 PM on 04/05/2012
So if women are bad omens on ships, surely every naval ship in the US and UK Navies will sink soon?
01:33 PM on 04/05/2012
Superstitions are just that: superstitions. It was human error that sank that ship nothing more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
01:33 PM on 04/05/2012
Lack of lifeboats and compitent senoir officers willing to take immediate decisions were the cause of the so many deaths.As said earlier steaming at high speed at large lumps of ice doesnt help
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
popart
retired school teacher
01:23 PM on 04/05/2012
Now if only we could get everyone who believes in superstitions on the same boat and then sink it the world would be a better place....smarter too.
12:56 PM on 04/05/2012
And of course they ignored the superstition that says ' it's unlucky to sail directly at big icy floaty things.'
12:53 PM on 04/05/2012
The presence of women, priests, dogs, barbers, flowers and red-heads on board had nothing to do with it driving into an iceberg. There must be 100+ cruise ships around and the only one of them that has sunk recently had an incompetent captain.
12:40 PM on 04/05/2012
Weren't barbers also called surgeons at one time and they sure as hell had surgeons on ships for a long long time before the Titanic went down.
I'm a bit surprised that Belfast thinks it can cash in on what happened. I don't think it's anything to be proud of. Building a ship that seems not to have been built correctly now.
01:52 PM on 04/05/2012
jenglow - the ship was properly built - she complied with all naval architecture standards of the times her sister ship " Olympic " steamed millions of miles and was in service until 1935.


Harland and Wolff were the greatest shipbuilder in the world at the time,had a huge reputation for the quality of ships they built , a cruise liner they built in 1936 was still in cruising service into this century - HMS Belfast is still afloat after 74 years - " Titanic " was perfectly fine when it left them .

They never claimed the ship was unsinkable ;no naval architect ever would, there is no such thing as an unsinkable ship .


No shipbuilder can be responsible for incorrect navigation of a ship by its officers - ships sink when those in command don't look where they are going, follow the charts and ensure they keep clear of potentialy dangerous situations such as icebergs, rocks , other vessels, - ships are not dangerous - sailors often are - eg Captain Smith, Captain Schettino etc .

Captain Smith had not exactly a spotless record - he run aground " Republic " in 1889, another ship aground in 1890, again in 1909 and when "Titanic's " sister " Olympic " entered service ran down another ship in New York, ran down HMS Hawke in Southampton " - with this record you would not lend him your car let alone sail with him - even the statue of him
12:37 PM on 04/05/2012
Women were often on board British ships of the line including at the battle of the Nile for Nelson. They went with their men and they fought just the same.
11:34 AM on 04/05/2012
What a stupid story. So all the other ships that didn't sink? just lucky I guess LOL. It was only called 'unsinkable' after it had sunk BTW.
11:16 AM on 04/05/2012
And the exact purpose of this feature is what precisely ????
photo
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
11:02 AM on 04/05/2012
What a non-story! I know the anniversary is coming up, but this is desperate!
10:02 AM on 04/05/2012
In that case why don't more cruise ships and passenger ships sink these days?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:48 AM on 04/05/2012
the cause was A ICEBERG not SUPERSTITION(S) ! i hope the 100th anniversary is well documented . for the lost . the families . & also because of the tragedy that it was . R.I.P to all those lost
09:37 AM on 04/05/2012
I fear Huffpost UK is sinking.

This is not NEW MEDIA.
This is OLD RUBBISH.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:56 AM on 04/05/2012
What a complete load of nonsense, on all counts. certainly not worth reporting here, but more important this is simply rubbish -- is the implication that passenger ships never carried women, or priests etc because of superstition? jeez, what total rubbish. If that last sentence "It leaves you wondering..." was actually written by her, then nothing the author writes can ever be trusted!!!