Leveson Inquiry: Rebekah Brooks Granted 'Core Participant' Status But Hugh Grant Denied

Posted: 5/04/2012 17:02 Updated: 5/04/2012 17:19   PA

Rebekah Brooks

Rebekah Brooks has been granted special status at the Leveson Inquiry into press standards.

The former News International chief executive was named as a "core participant", someone who has a significant interest in the hearings or may face criticism.

The move means she will have advance access to documents and witness statements, and the right to put questions to other witnesses through her lawyers.

But Lord Justice Leveson rejected an application for actor Hugh Grant to remain as a core participant in the inquiry's next section.

Brooks will give evidence to the inquiry as it moves into its third module, looking at relations between national newspapers and politicians.

She applied for core participant status for the first module but was turned down.

Lord Justice Leveson said in a ruling today: "On balance, I am persuaded that it would be right for me to confer upon her the additional rights which accrue with core participant status, including early access to documents, advance sight of witness statements (in confidence) and the right to make submissions (if so advised).

"Accordingly, subject to the appropriate confidentiality undertakings, I grant her application."

Brooks, who edited the News of the World and The Sun, has twice been arrested by Scotland Yard detectives investigating allegations of phone-hacking, corrupt payments to public officials and an attempt to pervert the course of justice. She was bailed and has not been charged.

Lord Justice Leveson also granted core participant status for module three to MPs Chris Bryant, Simon Hughes, Tessa Jowell, Denis MacShane, Claire Ward and Tom Watson, as well as to former deputy prime minister Lord Prescott and former MP Evan Harris.

The inquiry finished sessions yesterday for its second module, examining relationships between journalists and the police, and will resume on April 23 with evidence from newspaper proprietors.

FOLLOW UK

Filed by Michael Rundle  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
12:39 AM on 04/06/2012
Special treatment for Muckymurdoch's 'Priority' princess? But of course!
03:12 PM on 04/06/2012
Why special treatment? There are some criteria for people who want to be core participants. If she fits the description of who can be given core participation in Module 3 (which is examining the relationship between the press and politicians), then why not?
It's not special treatment. Brooks, media organizations and politicians meet these criteria so that's why they are core participants in this Module.
Others who were core participants in the Module 1 (which was examining the relationship between the press and the public) may not meet the core participation criteria for Module 3.
Let's take for example Hugh Grant, who features in the title of this article. He was eligible for Module 1 because he was very involved (press-public) but I can't see how he can be involved in Module 3 (press-politicians), how can he contribute to this Module?

Anyway, I believe Module 3 will be very interesting. It will be funny to see all these politicians (Labour and Tory), who all these years wanted and tried to win Murdoch's support, trying to distance themselves from the whole thing!
photo
Gavin Saunders
we only have each other
12:05 AM on 04/07/2012
Thank you for your excellent explanation of the distinction that evaded me from reading the article too hastily.

Somehow I missed that she had been turned down for the first module and I owe her a retraction and apology, however I am too petty an individual to pass up the opportunity to say she, and her supporters, can write me letters of idignation and I will make the equivalent effort of making amends as a small blurb buried somewhere in the back pages after the all the damage and fallout will be done.
08:04 PM on 04/07/2012
Becky, as a core participant, will probably unload on Rupert and when called herself, she will unload on James. James having fled UK to avoid being called in a judicial setting and under oath won't be there as a rebuttal witness so he is toast.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dizzies11
Right at my desk. UK.
07:01 PM on 04/05/2012
WHY OH WHY?..it`s becoming silly now.
06:14 PM on 04/05/2012
Of course! If you've got something on them, give them a chance to come up with a cover story. Just as they didn't do with the people they hacked.
06:31 PM on 04/05/2012
Actually, it will be interesting! The core participant status gives her the opportunity to ask questions to the witnesses (that's why the core participants see the documents before their publication). I'm sure she can ask some very interesting questions to some of her old/former political friends...
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
07:33 PM on 04/05/2012
The core participant status gives her the opportunity to ask questions to the witnesses (that's why the core participants see the documents before their publication).
**
and Brooks will only offer herself a World of hurt, if she tries to push anyone else over a cliff to her own advantage, at this point...

Let her try though, that could be fun,....everyone has waited years, for this particular 'day in court'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
06:43 PM on 04/05/2012
The people they 'hacked' were only 'little people'; you would surely not accord them equal rights with movers and shakers?
That would never do! You would give thoughts of equality, you rascal.
photo
Theatrixnyc
Remember John Lennon:Power To The People!
01:23 PM on 04/06/2012
Equality? Maybe not, but for the first time in a couple of decades, the balance of Murdoch's power has slipped into the lap of Authorities, all over the World.

I'll take it....much better than nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
11:16 AM on 04/07/2012
I think the real problem is that any man/ organisation was ever allowed to accumulate that amount of power.
I realise we should not allow ourselves to to bear lead by the media but it is all pervasive and seemingly omniscient.