Tariq Jahan Convicted Of Roadside Attack In Birmingham

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  Posted: 5/04/2012 13:00 Updated: 5/04/2012 13:09

Tariq Jahan
Tariq Jahan will be sentenced on Thursday

A bereaved father, who publicly appealed for calm after his son was killed in last summer's riots, has avoided jail after being convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on a man he accused of staring at his wife.

Tariq Jahan, 46, was given a 12-month suspended sentence following a three-day trial at Birmingham Crown Court.

Jurors heard he grabbed 34-year-old Sajjid Ali by the throat before punching him to the ground after the pair got into an argument in Handsworth, Birmingham, on 6 July last year.

The attack happened a month before Jahan won national acclaim for an impassioned appeal for peace after his 21-year-old son Haroon was killed during disorder in the Winson Green area of Birmingham.

The jury of seven men and five women took just under four hours to return a majority verdict. Jahan, who showed no visible reaction, was cleared of the more serious charge of causing grievous bodily harm with intent.

FOLLOW UK

A bereaved father, who publicly appealed for calm after his son was killed in last summer's riots, has avoided jail after being convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on a man he accused of star...
A bereaved father, who publicly appealed for calm after his son was killed in last summer's riots, has avoided jail after being convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on a man he accused of star...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 17
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
00:00 on 06/04/2012
GBH and he gets off. This a very serious crime carrying up to a 7 years sentence. He lost his son before this attack. Sad that he lost his son but let's not forget the victim of this attack.No wonder people are angry when the law makes exceptions for non- British criminals.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
Might as well laugh while you still can.
15:55 on 05/04/2012
Well people get off with stuff like this often so this is no surprise to me. I can't imagine for various reasons that his dead son was a factor in the decision. If anything his plea for calm who have been used to argue he's not one to go in for violence.
15:29 on 05/04/2012
People, read the story, just to save yourself an outpouring of excuses for the guy, the attack happened a month before his son was killed. Sad as his sons death was, and how terrific was his spoken words just the day after, it does go to show the amount of posters who never read the actual story they are commenting on.
photo
edmurfin
Old man, on Bonus Time:-)
14:50 on 05/04/2012
Seems to me that this man is still grieving his lost son. Grief for ones child lasts the rest of the parent's life and it's likely the perceptions of hostility in others will remain heightened for a long time. What he did was very wrong but we ought to be compassionate and, hopefully, this sad man will get the therapy he needs to help him deal properly with his grief.
15:26 on 05/04/2012
Er the attack happened a month before his son was killed!
photo
edmurfin
Old man, on Bonus Time:-)
15:58 on 05/04/2012
I failed to read until the end of the report - my remarks are thus invalid. Mea culpa!
16:02 on 05/04/2012
ed, you have revived my faith in posters....theres not many of us who admit to a pants post (and ive posted a few...) so well said and keep up the posting..lol
14:19 on 05/04/2012
whi is to say that the anger at losing his son and the affront he felt at another man staring at his wife, welled up and it all came out. Good luck to him, he was wrong but I can understand why he did it and how.
00:11 on 06/04/2012
Fgs So the man stared at his wife.That's a poor excuse for the beating he dished out. This happened before his son died so has nothing to do with his loss..
14:03 on 05/04/2012
I don't follow this at all. 12 months suspended for grievous bodily harm? I could understand this man getting perhaps a little more lenient sentence had he done this just AFTER his son was killed but surely even under those circumstances a suspended sentence would have been too lenient. But BEFORE his son was killed?

I would be interested to know what the judge said in his summing up.
22:07 on 05/04/2012
He may of said, if you was not a M***** YOU WOULD GO TO JAIL
photo
gimmeanamethen
saying it like it is
13:49 on 05/04/2012
makes you wonder where his priorities lie, his son gets killed in a hit and run and he is the calmest guy in the u.k, stare at his wife and he loses his rag??
as sad as it was that he lost his son, he should still be jailed like any other person would be.
13:41 on 05/04/2012
One law for one, and another law for the immigrants. British justice stinks.
22:11 on 05/04/2012
And when the justice system treats them softly, they wonder why we are getting stressed out with them
13:08 on 05/04/2012
grievous bodily harm with intent and he will get a slap on the wrist