Car Insurance Renewal Fees A Rip-Off, Say Which?

Posted: 15/04/2012 07:09 Updated: 15/04/2012 07:33   PA

Insurance Renewal Forms

Drivers and homeowners are being charged "exorbitant fees" for minor policy alterations and renewals, according to an investigation by Which? magazine.

Charges include up to £30 for minor amendments including change of address, updating personal details or transferring to other vehicles, the research showed.

Cancelling policies or even simply renewing a policy can also attract charges, the consumer group found.

Which? has criticised the charges for not being clear enough and not easily accessible to customers using an insurers website.

Research shows that both Axa and Swiftcover charge customers £30 to change their address, update their surname on marriage or change the vehicle covered by their motor insurance.

The same changes attract a £35 fee at Hastings, which also charges customers a £5 renewal fee.

50plus Insurance charges £10 for renewal, while both companies charge a flat £10 set-up fee.

Cancelling a policy also attracts fees, with Budget Insurance charging £75 per cancellation of a car insurance policy and Axa, Zurich, Sheila's Wheels and More Than charging £50 or more for the same service.

The report also highlights the high interest charges attached to a number of policies when customers elect to pay by instalments.

Budget Insurance, Axa and Swiftcover all charged between 29.3% and 32.3% interest depending on the policy. In contrast, Age UK and First Direct do not charge extra for their monthly payment options.

Which? chief executive, Peter Vicary-Smith, said: "It's a disgrace that insurers charge exorbitant fees to make basic changes to a policy. These charges should reflect the real cost to the company and not a way of making easy money from consumers who are already struggling with high and rising insurance premiums.

"We want insurance companies to be clearer about the fees that they charge and stop hiding the details away in pages of terms and conditions. The new regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority, must ensure that any charges reflect the actual cost incurred by the insurance provider."

The review of the terms and conditions found on the websites of 39 car insurers and 34 home insurers appears in the May edition of Which?

In response to the report, Swiftcover said: "When it comes to swiftcover.com and 'hidden charges', as Which? puts it, they have simply got it wrong.

"Swiftcover.com has always been an online-only insurer, allowing customers to change their policy online whenever they wish, and as often as they need to - without charge. If, however, a policyholder chooses to update their policy by speaking to the help desk, there is an admin charge of £30, like with many other insurers."

FOLLOW UK

Drivers and homeowners are being charged "exorbitant fees" for minor policy alterations and renewals, according to an investigation by Which? magazine. Charges include up to £30 for minor amendmen...
Drivers and homeowners are being charged "exorbitant fees" for minor policy alterations and renewals, according to an investigation by Which? magazine. Charges include up to £30 for minor amendmen...
Filed by Chris Wimpress  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:09 on 16/04/2012
look like Brad and Anjolina on a bad day !!!!
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
22:46 on 15/04/2012
The insurance comapnies aren't in it for their health, it's obviously rigged to give 'em a fat juicy profit. They'll continue to apply surcharge after surcharge, and there's not much we can do about it if we want to drive.
17:19 on 15/04/2012
I am a little surprised some foreign insurance corporation that isn't involved in Britain yet hasn't looked at the state of the insurance industry here and decided it could make a killing offering value for money fresh and renewal products that the average disaffected customer would jump at the chance of taking. It only takes one brave company to jump in and tempt millions of ripped off Brits fed up of the lies and scams that virtually all companies partake in.
Oh and when it comes to renewals the company that prides itself on not being on price comparison web sites is one of the worst offenders, pick up the red telephone or mouse and cancel!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
16:19 on 15/04/2012
That's a good idea,third party insurance lumped together with goverment controlled road tax.
I will write to David and see what he has to say about it.
13:19 on 15/04/2012
I lived in australia for a few years and the car registration payment included insurance.The insurance was for the car,not the driver,and covered about the same as third party .If i remember the annual payment was quite reasonable and a sticker showing the month of expiry was displayed .Additional insurance cover was available from private insurance companys.so as long as the car was "taxed" the car was insured.If the car was on the road without a current rego then it could be impounded.
Motor cars were not subject to an annual inspection but the owners were held responsible for the condition of the vehicle and if stopped for any reason a full inspection could be carried out and the vehicle banned from the road
17:57 on 15/04/2012
Here, the security mad civil service, paranoid from birth, see the best way to control ALL road usage is by camera surveillance. What started out as speed cameras, now get you on parking, pausing to let someone out or pick up, even, believe it or not,. penalising someone for being stuck behind a bus, but on double yellow lines, as long as you are static they get you.
Latterly, they now can spend a couple of billions on specialised equipment that picks up your registration number , compares it to the data bank in the DVLA, (driver vehicle licencing agency) and if with no test certificate or insurance pull; you off the road and possibly have your car trashed.
Cheap alternatives like you point out does not suit this surveillance mad police state.
07:09 on 18/04/2012
The Australian system of insurance through a registration fee actually only covers a third party or parties for bodily injury. The vehicle(s) is not covered. Whilst it is legal to drive on registration only, it is very unwise as you could end up paying for damages to another vehicle for many years.
13:00 on 15/04/2012
RIP OFF BRITAIN.!!!! Not only Insurance companies but almost everything we buy from the multi-national companies! :- up to 50% 70% off, - off what? and how does anyone know what 10 or 15 weeks free insurance amounts to. Its all a rip off!. and always will be.
This comment has been removed.
09:44 on 15/04/2012
I like the Lady Penelope angle on this story. We are the puppets in the great insurance rip-off, and the insurance monopolies are pulling the strings. Politicians or insurance companies, which are worst ? There is only one way to find out.......fight !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
08:35 on 15/04/2012
Beefy... the reason why is, because the law says we HAVE to have insurance, this gives the insurers a virtual monopoly in their capability to set premiums at whatever level they choose.

In effect this is legalised theft. Pretty much like what happened when we suffered from Retail Price Maintenance that allowed suppliers to set the price a shop could charge for goods. Which, thanks Tesco smashing through that law by taking Kayser Bondor to court over the price of nylon stockings, died the death it deserved.

If this watchdog can likewise smash through the insurance scam, I for one will be very grateful.
12:09 on 15/04/2012
a virtual monopoly
--------------------------
There are many insurers so no monopoly. A cartel would be the main group fixing prices. New entries to market can offer lower prices and break cartel.
13:07 on 15/04/2012
I am talking about the underwriting fraternity, not the brokers.

The margins allowed to brokers does give the perception of 'competition;. but when a check is made on the underwriters they will at best refer you to a broker, or fob you off with some crap about sensitive commercial information.

New entrants are subjected to that limited margin band of allowances so please, don't get confused with what is delivered retail, and what could be available if the wholesale figures could be made available to study.

The enquiry has it right, we ARE being ripped off big time by the major underwriting players.
08:22 on 15/04/2012
I have always paid for fully comp car insurance,which gave me windscreen cover,courtesy car,NCB protection.But what i have noticed over the past couple of renewals is the fore mention are now payable seperatly and the policy as gone up by at least £150-200 per year why.
08:44 on 15/04/2012
Also, to take note of is the fact that the insurance industry claims it is the third party element of cover that takes up the largest proportion of the premium.

This means if you damage another's property, they will meet the cost of repair or replacement.

In my own case, I hjave what they call an ;import', the premium for which is very high.

I intend to challenge the insurers next week as if they are telling me my premium is higher for third party because my car is an ;import; I want to know what a similar car, not an 'import' would be charged for third party cover. As I see it, where the car originated should not affect any third party claim against me.
I can accept a larger charge for comprehensive, on their argument that being an 'import' any parts may be more expensive. But even then Toyota told me that was a false claim anyway. As ALL their older car parts for non 'import' vehicles have to be soufrced from Japan.
17:17 on 15/04/2012
Its a load of cods wallop,the price for parts on imported cars are no more exspensive than those made in this country,taking into account most cars are imports in one way or another the insurance company your dealing with is talking crap.