Ed Miliband Calls For Political Party Donation Cap Of £5,000

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 15/04/2012 10:52 Updated: 15/04/2012 10:56

Ed Miliband has suggested that political party funding should be reformed, with a cap on individual donations set at £5,000.

But the Labour leader insists that the political levy paid by trade union members to the Labour party should remain, something the Tories are likely to find unacceptable as negotiations on how to reform party funding continue.

Miliband told the Andrew Marr show on BBC One that even if the voluntary levy on union members remained, Labour would still stand to lose "millions of pounds".

"Just looking at the last year, and it’s important as a corrective to some of what’s out there, 40% of our income came from our members and about 40% came from the trade unions and the rest from individual donors and others, so we’re talking about a significant change here," he said.

Labour - which is struggling financially amid several million pounds of debts - has resisted Tory claims to end the large payments it receives from the trade unions. Both parties have been dragging their feet over reforming the political party funding system, which has led to a continuous stream of alleged sleaze over many years.

A report last year by the Committee for Standards in Public Life called for the taxpayer to takeover bankrolling the political parties. The committee's chairman, Sir Christopher Kelly, insisted this would be the only way to end the allegations of impropriety. Both Labour and the Tories rejected this proposal.

But the allegations of cash-for-access surrounding a sting on former Tory party co-treasurer Peter Cruddas last month acted as a watershed in the long-running debate about party funding, and the three main parties resumed talks on how to reform the system last week.

In an interview with The Huffington Post last week, constitutional reform minister Mark Harper accepted that reforms were inevitable, and would cause "pain for both parties". But he rejected outright the suggestion that the taxpayer should step in to fund party politics.

"It would be very difficult for voters to accept that while we're making tough decisions about benefits and tax and public spending, that the one thing we were going to find some resources for is giving political parties some money, " he told us.

A cap on donations of £5,000 would, on the face of it, be highly detrimental to the Conservative Party, which regularly sees six-figure sums donated to it by wealthy individuals and companies.

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Ed Miliband has suggested that political party funding should be reformed, with a cap on individual donations set at £5,000. But the Labour leader insists that the political levy paid by trade u...
Ed Miliband has suggested that political party funding should be reformed, with a cap on individual donations set at £5,000. But the Labour leader insists that the political levy paid by trade u...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 47
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
22:17 on 24/04/2012
Yes Ed, cap the donations at £5000 as long as you still have union money flowing in to prevent the Labour Party going bankrupt. Better still, let every political party stand or fall on its merits, no donations except those the MPs pay in themselves, if they support their own side that much they should be happy to donate to keep them going.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
16:12 on 16/04/2012
Is this fella for real? To think anyone would agree to his stupid proposal.
07:11 on 16/04/2012
What a pity his mother didn`t have a dutch cap.
19:28 on 15/04/2012
the only people funding this corupt party now is the corupt unions
19:18 on 15/04/2012
The unions back Labour, the rich and large company's the Tory's, the problem is they both forget the majority in the middle.
18:33 on 15/04/2012
Ed faces a simple choice, if he wants to protect the "donations" from unions, then he must admit that the unions are a constitutant part of the Labour Party, and therefore the Labour Party can be held responsible for the actions of unions and their members, just as they are held responsiblle for the actions of other parts of the party. Which of course means that the Labour Front bench would have to admit they are responsible for the next stike by any union, the economice cost of the work stopage, and the difficulties caused to the general population. If they do not want that resposibility, then the need to do without the "donations."
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
19:22 on 15/04/2012
Then maybe the Tories will admit their links with big business' and the bankers?..That ain't gonna happen is it?. Everyone with at least half a brain should realise that Labours links with the unions are historical and the Labour party was born of the Trade Unions'..You'll also find that not all unions are affiliated to the Labour Party'..So why shouldn't the ordinary worker be represented?...Big Business' stands up for the Tories'..Whats the difference?..But Ed's Milibands' Cap on individual donors seems quite sensible to me.
20:58 on 15/04/2012
To use your terms, if everyone with half a brain should realise that Labours links with the unions is historical, then anyone with half a brain would realize that the Conservative Party links with other groups are historical. If it is okay for for Labour to retain their historical ties, then it should also be okay for the Conservative Party to do the same. What Ed and you are proposing is a double standard, one that allows Labour to maintain its historical ties, while demanding that other parties give up theirs. Do you call that fairness.
Now one is suggesting that anyone should give up their right to represented. People are only asking that the rights of others be protected in the same way.
Labour is so busy whining about its percieved unfair treatment that they do not acknowledge that the are treating others unfairly.
The donation rules should be the same for all parties. If groups are not allowed to contribute to one party, then groups, like unions should not be allowed to contribute to another party. A member of a union can still contribute, if they wish, just as a business owner may contribute if they wish. But there should not be a rule against one group and not the other.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepekitch
15:02 on 16/04/2012
Here here,We need an election,this caoilition is def not working.
18:22 on 15/04/2012
How did the Miliband brothers get to be so important in Labour party politics? It seems that they are completely at odds with their constituents on foreign policy.
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
16:30 on 17/04/2012
But what has this to do with party funding?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edgar H
Keep the Press free!
17:52 on 15/04/2012
Ed should make the best of his Easter holidays, be a good lad and speak when spoken too. Nothing worse than a politician who fails to see that he is talking cr#p. If he is good he can always be the hall monitor.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepekitch
18:27 on 15/04/2012
Dave can give out the pencils.
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
16:31 on 17/04/2012
..I doubt if Dave could do that properly...?lol
17:38 on 15/04/2012
If the big Trades Unions pulled the plug labour would be bankrupt in a heartbeat. The Unions get nothing in return for the contributions. Did labour repeal any ant-trade union laws? No, they even passed their own, and last year labour M.P.s crossed picket lines. So let labour go bust they are tory in all but name anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edgar H
Keep the Press free!
18:17 on 15/04/2012
I wouldn't call the Trade Unions ability to elect the Labour party leader, getting nothing for money.
He may not be value for money, however, they are the puppet masters and he the puppet!
photo
casual agent
Advocate for social justice
16:40 on 17/04/2012
But theres the rub'....You either have a Labour leader who responds to everything the unions demand'..or you have one that goes against everything....On one hand you'would have people saying the unions were controling Labour and on the other' People saying they're not responsive enough. What would be you're solution to this problem?...As I think they have it about right....That from a lifelong socialist..
20:05 on 17/04/2012
Well said,from a die hard Labour supporter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DaveJohnWard
17:19 on 15/04/2012
I want to live in the world Ed lives in. No need to worry about facts, common sense or reality checks.
16:12 on 15/04/2012
Britain will never be democratic whist independent funding is needed to run parties. Each Party should be funded by the taxpayer to an equal amount and all other sources of financial backing banned.
As it is we have the Cons bending to the requirements of business and Labour to the unions.... no of them make decisions to primarily benefit the public.
15:49 on 15/04/2012
£5000 that wont even get you beans on toast with camerons nanny .... itll never work
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
20:26 on 15/04/2012
Brilliant comment. I haven't laughed so much in ages. Probably very close to the truth as well. ;-)
Kraptonfactor
They're coming to take me away ha ha, hee hee, ho
15:41 on 15/04/2012
Let's stop calling them donations when we all know very well they are bribes.
15:14 on 15/04/2012
not a bad suggestion provided all Union 'members' be allowed to donate their political donation to which ever party they choose (if they want to contribute at all!) I am sure Ed Grommit won't put that idea forward!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
15:09 on 15/04/2012
How about the Dutch cap, that should stop the the pro creation of fiddles and back door fiddling of funds by backhander schemes........