Gatwick Emergency Landing: 15 Hospitalised In Virgin Atlantic Plane Incident

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  Posted: 16/04/2012 21:12 Updated: 16/04/2012 21:12

Gatwick
The Virgin Atlantic plane was heading for Florida before turning back

Fifteen people were hospitalised after a Virgin Atlantic plane was forced to make an emergency landing at Gatwick Airport.

Passengers suffered a range of injuries, including suspected fractures and cuts, as they escaped Airbus A330 using the emergency chutes on Monday.

Passenger Tom Aldridge told the BBC: "The people panicking as they were jumping off were throwing themselves out of the plane down the chute and there was a big pile of bodies at the bottom where people were just landing on top of each other and there were quite a few injuries."

And fellow passenger Kirsty Bonwick told radio station LBC: "A lot of people were hurt scraping their arms and legs and elbows and bleeding... you think you're going to stop at the end of the chute and then get up, but you go flying off of it and you just went across the concrete, which is why everybody cut their arms and legs and were bleeding."

There were reports of a small fire on board as the Florida-bound plane came in to land two hours after it had taken off just before 11am.

Steve Ridgway, chief executive of Virgin Atlantic, said the flight, carrying 301 adults and three children, was not far out of London when the technical alarms went off on the flight deck.

He said the captain made the decision to turn the aircraft around and fly back to Gatwick.

He said: "We carried out an emergency evacuation, which was the right thing to do."

Dr Jane Pateman, South East Coast Ambulance Service medical director, said: "A total of 15 patients were transferred to hospital, 14 of which went to two major trauma centres, at St George's Hospital and Royal Sussex County Hospital, suffering from suspected fractures."

West Sussex Fire and Rescue Service said it was called at 12.21pm to reports of a "small fire on board an aircraft", which had made a full emergency landing.

Flights in and out of Gatwick were suspended from the time of the emergency landing until around 2pm, with a number of incoming flights diverted - some to Stansted airport in Essex.

The Virgin plane after it had to emergency land and evacuate due to a 'technical fault'

Virgin Atlantic's president, Sir Richard Branson, tweeted: "Very sorry to all passengers on board VS27. The staff @virginatlantic are doing everything they can to look after everybody. More info soon."

Lorna Willson, 23, who works in a building that overlooks the runway, said she saw the immediate aftermath of the landing.

She went on: "I was just eating my lunch and I noticed the plane. They usually take off quite quickly but this one didn't go anywhere.

"Then I realised all the chutes were out and there were lots of fire engines and police.

"I think the passengers had been taken off, but you could see a few stewardesses. There was quite a lot of emergency services there."

Virgin Atlantic said: "Our teams at Gatwick are now offering full support, looking after our passengers and assisting with their immediate requirements.

"We are working closely with the authorities to establish the cause of this incident. The safety and welfare of our crew and passengers is our top priority."

FOLLOW UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 52
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:35 AM on 04/17/2012
The " Compo " companies will be rubbing their hands in gleeeeeee.
08:28 AM on 04/17/2012
After the terrible experience we had on Virgin Atlantic in February, to which they won't even bother to respond, I don't hold out much hope that these passengers will be "looked after". Sadly, Virgin are a company that is still running on a reputation they had when they did have a decent customer service. Those days are gone. I hope everyone who was injured is OK but I wouldn't hold out much hope that #Virgin Atlantic are going to be helpful to them.
07:16 AM on 04/17/2012
Sounds like a right balls up of an exit and I wonder why the cabin crew did not brief the passengers a little better, especially the first ones out.
*
The plane had flown for sometime with the problem and although it is reported that there was a small fire somewhere on board is was not about to blow up so I question the cabin crew handling of the incident.
*
Maybe they were worried because they had lost the key to the drinks locker, something they prefer to keep firmly locked on long haul flights.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
01:22 PM on 04/17/2012
It was an emergency evacuation, on the runway, with a reported cargo fire. Listen to the safety briefing. Get down the damn slide.
*
Time is of the essence. The plane flies fine until it fills with smoke or falls apart, when all on board are killed. Have a look at the UPS 747 in 2011 Dubai, or the Swissair MD11 in the Atlantic in 1998. The captain briefs the cabin crew about the return, calls for an emergency evacuation, and an emergency evacuation ensues. Cabin crew can usually initiate an evacuation too, should to be necessary in their professional judgement.
06:00 PM on 04/17/2012
I am not questioning the pilots decision to evacuate. The plane was not full of smoke so there should have been a textbook exit.
*
But it is clear, from other reports I have read, that it was the cabin crew that panicked and the exit was far from orderly.
*
Compare this incident with the hapless pilot who crash landed in the Hudson River knowing such landings had never previously had a happy ending. After it came to a stop the cabin crew displayed the highest standards of disaster management and organised an orderly exit of all passengers onto the wings.
*
Even a passenger who panicked and partly opened a rear door was calmed and led to the wing exits.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:52 AM on 04/17/2012
"A total of 15 patients were transferred to hospital, 14 of which went to two major trauma centres, at St George's Hospital and Royal Sussex County Hospital, suffering from suspected fractures."
It appears the "fractures" and other injuries were sustained at the bottom of the evacuation chutes.......I can only assume that the correct evacuation protocols were not fully implemented and/or complied with!
Where did number 15 go?
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
01:23 PM on 04/17/2012
Fall thirty feet on a big slide, and you need to be ready to get off.
Read the safety card. Listen to the safety briefing.
Burning to death is no fun either.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:23 PM on 04/17/2012
Your last sentence is simply a statement of the profoundly obvious and was unnecessary, except for dramatic effect of course.
Clearly your advice,which is excellent, was not put into practice on this occasion.
Don't forget this "fire" had been "burning" for quite some time but nobody suffered from any burns or even smoke inhalation, all the injuries were sustained on the ground outside the aircraft because the crew failed or were unable to control the safe evacuation of passengers effectively. Panic is one of the primary causes of deaths and injuries in many similar situations.
06:13 AM on 04/17/2012
Stay in England
This comment has been removed.
11:10 PM on 04/16/2012
not the nicest way to start/end a holiday - (even if they did get stomach churning chutes jumps and plane landing to rivel the big dipper in Disney World).
10:46 PM on 04/16/2012
What makes me laugh is how they took the injured to Royal Sussex County Hospital 31.2 miles away and to St George's 26.7 miles away, when there is a major trauma centre at East Surrey Hospital 6.5 miles away and a minor injuries centre at Crawley Hospital 6.4 miles away!!!!!
Why the hell take the injured so far away???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:10 PM on 04/16/2012
CUT*
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tulliallon
11:16 PM on 04/16/2012
simple nhs stats doesnt matter if patient is in need of help,MUST KEEP THE BOOKS LOOKING GOOD so they can be paid , thank god they wernt there in last war they would have made a right balls up
10:15 PM on 04/16/2012
Sorry but i find it hard to believe that 2 hours after takeoff from Gatwick it was still close to London, en-route to Florida.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:14 PM on 04/16/2012
Maybe it had flown an hour and it took and hour to get back,...VERY SLOWLY
11:18 PM on 04/16/2012
"Sorry but i find it hard to believe that 2 hours after takeoff from Gatwick it was still close to London, en-route to Florida."

It landed about 2 hours after taking off but it wasn't heading away from Gatwick for this time.
This morning, aircraft were taking off to the east, so the plane would have climbed out to the east then turned and headed west. This would have taken 10 or 15 minutes before it was heading the right way.

Then if the incident occurred a short while after this, (say 20 or 25 minutes), the aircraft would then have needed to turn again before heading back.
If it was at or near it's maximum take off weight, it may also have needed to circle to dump fuel before landing.

Add all of these times together and the 2 hours from take off to landing would be possible without the aircraft having gone too far.
Unless it was close to Shannon in Ireland, returning to Gatwick would be the correct thing to do.
09:52 PM on 04/16/2012
Strange how the figure has jumped initially from 4 to 15. With the UK fast becoming increasingly like the US where sue culture is concerned, I don't have to say anymore.