Blogger Olly Cromwell Faces Prison For Calling Bexley Councillor A C**t On Twitter

Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 16/04/2012 11:49 Updated: 16/04/2012 11:53

Olly Cromwell
Olly Cromwell

A London-based blogger called "Olly Cromwell" faces a jail term for calling his local Bexley councillor a 'c***' on Twitter, after he was found guilty of improper use of social media sites.

Prosecutors are calling for Cromwell, whose real name is John Graham Kerlen, to be imprisoned for up to six months over the offence, after Greenwich court found him guilty on Friday.

Kerlen was charged with "grossly offensive malicious communications", after the councillor for Bexley council in south east London complained to police last December.

In a ruling that could set a legal precedent for freedom of speech on social media sites, the 37-year-old was found guilty of improper use of public electronic communications network, under a Section 127 offence of the Communications Act 2003.

If the prosecution are given their way when Kerlen is sentenced on 9 May, he would be jailed for 45 days for each letter of the offensive word.

Kerlen, who tweets under the name 'Chaos Is Order!' and @Sir_Olly_C, was criticising his own South London local authority on Twitter.

Annoyed, he allegedly posted a picture of a Bexley councillor's house on Twitter, writing "Which c*** lives in a house like this. Answers on a postcard to #bexleycouncil."

He later posted another tweet which said "It’s silly posting a picture of a house on Twitter without an address, that will come later. Please feel free to post actual s**t."

Although intially Kerlen was also charged with harrassment, reports one blogger, this charge was later dropped.

Kerlen has been prevented from blogging about the conviction, after a restraining order issued in December prevented him from mentioning Bexley council and its councillors, either directly or indirectly on any social media sites or blogs.

His supporters, publicising their blogs under the hashtag #freethebexleyone, have spoken out about his conviction. Blogger Spiderplantland, who has met Kerlen, highlighted the importance of the case after Friday's guilty verdict.

"What this restraining order essentially did is restrict Olly, a voter and resident in Bexley who had not, as yet, been convicted of any crime whatsoever, from using his right to free speech to challenge the views and actions of his elected councillors on his local council.

Twitter users and bloggers have expressed solidarity with Kerlen's plight and the ramifications of the guilty verdict, with one blogger writing:

"If you, like me, have ever slagged off anyone in authority using the medium of words, the current predicament of sweary blogger and avid Tweetist @Sir_Olly_C should have you rather worried."

Bexley Council issued a statement saying that though they were "totally supportive of freedom of expression and legitimate political debate, they believed that Kerlen's actions "went beyond the limits of what is both acceptable and reasonable in terms of freedom of expression"

Councillors are entitled to know "that their families and their homes are not legitimate targets for abuse" the statement continues.

However if there were hopes that Friday's conviction by Greenwich Court would stop offensive messages being posted about Bexley councillors, the ruling may have backfired. Twitter users have been using the c-word in connection with Bexley councillors sparingly, in defiance of the verdict.

Olly Cromwell, or Kerlen has continued to blog after moving his website so that the blog is hosted offshore. However, his website is down at the moment. It is unclear whether this is due to intervention by the authorities or simply crashing due to the number of visits


Chaos is Order!
My website is down at the moment. It might be because of sheer volume of visits. Maybe something else. Not sure

Kerlen is to be sentenced on 9 May.

FOLLOW UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 231
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
11:13 PM on 04/17/2012
Isn't it ironic that police officers (public servants) often swear at protestors or people they are arresting and nothing is ever done. Yet when a civilian swears at a public servant (be it a councilor in this case), he faces prison time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:50 PM on 04/17/2012
I think it's probably classed as "industrial language" if you're a Bobby.
10:24 PM on 04/17/2012
What kind of nanny state are we deteriorating into when someone can be jailed for calling someone a name....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WillieBlack
10:20 PM on 04/17/2012
We should make this a lawful part of the democratic process in the UK.

Put a cross against your preferred candidate (as ever) and a "C" or a "W" against the name of a miscreant of your choice.

At the end of the count, the returning officer could announce the winner, followed by the candidate who the electorate voted the biggest c...

Get the beers in, and watch John Snow and Paxo make what they will of it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:49 PM on 04/17/2012
Bound to cause huge embarrassment to the BNP and UKIP (not to mention the Lib/Dems).
09:33 PM on 04/17/2012
Looks to me like the offence was the implied threat / incitement, not the use of the 4 letter word.

Is the HP trying to make this story something it isn't ?
09:08 PM on 04/17/2012
Most amusing.. However I really do think being allowed to blog/post extremely offensive stuff has to be challenged..
Very cowardice in my view
06:29 PM on 04/17/2012
Free Speech is vital in a free society, so prosecution over the use of a certain word is overkill. Threats, slander and false accusations are something else and some control is needed.

But reverting to such coarse language cannot be seen as productive, as it cheapens any point the corespondant was trying to make. Any political point however valid will be lost over the manner its is delivered in.

Mr Kerlen has the right to vote or even stand against the counciller he despises. That would be a more effective way of getting his point over. Now he may have gained noteriety but many people will have dismissed outright what he says just beacuse of one word.

If he is jailed then its been a costly way to make his point.
05:51 PM on 04/17/2012
Very clever of the media not to mention the Councillor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clownzozo
Magician, Novelist and an Angry Old Git
05:44 PM on 04/17/2012
But was his trial lawful?
Unless he has harmed someone, or caused them loss or damage to their property, acted dishonestly, caused a breach of the peace, there is no crime in Law.
Unlawful trials, those without juries, the revenue making rackets that take place in Magistrate's Courts, concern statutes, government legislation, which cannot be applied to us, unless we waive our protection of Common Law and agree to be bound by them. No one ever tells us that, however. They act as if we have no choice, but the truth is we do, we have the right and a duty to refuse legal and insist on Lawful trials.
No one may be made to suffer cruel or unusual punishment, unless you call a politician a 'C', as in Clown of course.
photo
carneliancrystal
Do I believe all the propaganda of course I do
09:59 PM on 04/17/2012
You have a point there, Also what if the statement is true? should he, being the counselor not have to prove (a question I would have asked) he isn't whatever he has been made out to be?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clownzozo
Magician, Novelist and an Angry Old Git
12:33 PM on 04/18/2012
There's an old saying, "If it acts like a duck, quacks like a duck, and sounds like a duck -It probably is a duck."
05:44 PM on 04/17/2012
There's also a saying: Sticks and Stones etc.
05:42 PM on 04/17/2012
Councillor's are elected to represent the views and concerns of the people who elected them. If an elected councillor does something that goes against the vies and concerns of the electorate then reactions, such as Olly's, when lost for other words, are used. Surely the councillor is proving himself be what he was refered as by taking the action.

Dictionay: slang term - a mean or obnoxious person.

Does the councillor have any connection with any of the JP's sitting on the bench in Bexley?

Thanks to jmmcmkn (7 down) for the point made about Fiona Pilkington.
03:11 PM on 04/17/2012
Noel Edwards, recently took action after a web site was set up calling for his death. no police , he tracked the guy down met him and explained how it had upset his family the guy apologised. He then offered to fund the guy ( who was a student) to carry out a research project to look in to how these sites cause problems.
03:07 PM on 04/17/2012
It's only a word.By sending someone to prison for using it only adds importance to the swear word.Look what goes on for normal talk on the late night tv shows.That show with Dara O Briain and his pals for instance.(I ve forgotten what it's called) Are they going to be sent to prison?
How a person chooses to express themselves doesn't really matter .And to the clever dick..I have read the story.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chaserblue
Shaving my legs with Occam's razor
02:53 PM on 04/17/2012
But if the councillor is having him prosecuted and sent to prison for calling him that on twitter, doesn't that make what he called him a true statement? I think he should get off on that alone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
02:51 PM on 04/17/2012
C**t is a pretty risky word and can leave a bad taste in your mouth.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 PM on 04/17/2012
Even if it's a slip of the tongue.
12:16 AM on 04/18/2012
Which reminds me - how do you get rid of pubic hair ?..........Spit it out !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Daviejohn
All the world's a stage,
12:44 PM on 04/17/2012
I do think the word offensive to use in a public media,but prison? come on.