Gay Marriage: Anglican Bishops And Senior Clergy Back Same-Sex Marriage In Letter To Times

PA/Huffington Post UK  |  Posted: 21/04/2012 09:17 Updated: 21/04/2012 09:39

Gay Marriage
Elaine and Debbie Gaston became one of the first same-sex unions in England and Wales to form a civil Partnership

The Church of England has "nothing to fear" from the introduction of gay marriage, according to a group of senior bishops and clergymen.

The influential Anglicans said the prospect of same-sex marriage should be a "cause for rejoicing" and argued the perception that the majority of the Christian Church opposed legalising it was wrong.

In a letter to the Times, the signatories, which include members of the General Synod, the governing body of the church, and high-ranking clergy, said: "Recent statements by church leaders past and present may have given the impression that the
Church is universally opposed to the extension of civil marriage to same-sex couples.

OPINION: Scroll down to leave you comments below.

"We believe that does not adequately reflect the range of opinion which exists within the Church of England."

The church leaders describe marriage as a "robust institution which has adapted much over the centuries" and say it has "moved beyond the polygamy of the Old Testament and preoccupation with social status and property in pre-Enlightened times".


Dr Jeffrey John, the openly gay Dean of St Albans, who organised the letter

Arguing that "God's grace" is at work in same-sex partnerships, the letter adds: "The Church calls marriage holy or sacramental because the covenant relationship of committed, faithful love between the couple reflects the covenanted love and commitment between God and his church.

BLOG: Discrimination against Christians has also been a defining feature of the debate about same-sex marriage.

"Growing in this kind of love means we are growing in the image of God. That there are same-sex couples who want to embrace marriage should be a cause for rejoicing in the Christian Church."

The joint statement is said to have been organised by Dr Jeffrey John, the openly gay Dean of St Albans.

In the letter, the influential Christians, which include five former bishops and the serving Deans of Portsmouth, Norwich and Guildford, welcome moves by the General Synod's House of Bishops to reconsider its view of civil partnerships and human sexuality.

They also welcome comments made by the Bishop of Salisbury and the new Dean of St Paul's Cathedral in which they called on the Church to affirm same-sex couples.

"We believe that the church of England has nothing to fear from the introduction of civil marriage for same-sex couples," the letter adds.

"It will be for the churches to then decide how they respond pastorally to such a change in the law."

Quick Poll

Does the introduction of civil marriage for same-sex couples threaten the CofE?

VOTE

Plans to legalise gay civil marriage by 2015 have been put out for consultation by the government.

Under the proposals same-sex couples will be entitled to get married in a register office or other civil ceremonies, or convert existing civil partnerships.

Existing marriages in which one partner changed their sex would also no longer have to be ended.

The blueprint however maintains a legal ban on same-sex religious services despite some churches expressing an interest in conducting them.

Leaders of the Roman Catholic Church have remained resolutely opposed to gay marriage and blessing civil partnerships but the issue has split the Anglican Communion.

On Friday, Conservative MP Karl McCartney sparked controversy when a letter to a constituent was leaked in which he said same-sex marriage would have the effect of "uprooting thousands of years of Christian tradition".

FOLLOW UK

The Church of England has "nothing to fear" from the introduction of gay marriage, according to a group of senior bishops and clergymen. The influential Anglicans said the prospect of same-sex marr...
The Church of England has "nothing to fear" from the introduction of gay marriage, according to a group of senior bishops and clergymen. The influential Anglicans said the prospect of same-sex marr...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 296
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
22:03 on 26/04/2012
Again, a forward looking and progressive church of enlightened Christians is opening the door wider and wider to permit those who are slaves to ignorance and a false reading of the scriptures to become illumined.

The marriage act should be taken out of the hands of ALL religions. Anyone, gay or straight, is legally married by going before a town hall clerk, judge, etc. If the clergy wish to opt out of performing their roll as a witness to marriages they view as objectionable, let them do it.
17:45 on 23/04/2012
If " Gay Marriage " was allowed what would happen next ???.. Marrying more than oone person, Adults marrying children, people marrying animals... where would it stop ???... Stop this madness. Please sign the petition and say no to " Gay Marriage " at http://www.c4m.org.uk I have and I hope you will too.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:43 on 23/04/2012
Duckie J, dear, - I think you must mean "CUE fundie outrage".

However, you have missed the point completely. This is not about outrage or rejoicing, it is about logic and common sense. The merits or otherwise of homosexuals' love, or otherwise, is not the question. The question is "what is marriage?". The answer, of course, is the union betwen one man and one women. All homosexuals do have the right to marriage - they can "know they are equal and feel very free" in that respect - if they are a man, they can marry a woman,like anyone else, and if they are a woman, they can marry a man.

Homosexuals do deserve equality - but truth cannot be changed to please them. To suggest otherwise is ridculous.
photo
JDuck
Until we know the equal we'll never feel the free.
07:00 on 23/04/2012
"The Church calls marriage holy or sacramental because the covenant relationship of committed, faithful love between the couple reflects the covenanted love and commitment between God and his church.

"Growing in this kind of love means we are growing in the image of God. That there are same-sex couples who want to embrace marriage should be a cause for rejoicing in the Christian Church."

Que the standard fundy outrage...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:15 on 22/04/2012
Everyones views in the UK whatever their creed,religion or sexuality are relevant, none of the views are irrelevant, what ever they are. Peoples views from outside the UK are irrelevant, this is UK laws not international laws. Nobody has the right to judge whos views are relevant or not, especially by those who profess to be able to judge everything and everybody.
Too many people are using the excuse of " it doesn't effect them, SO IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THEM" - WHO! has been given the right to decide who is effected by anything and who is not effected, answer "NOBODY"
It cannot be judged on one point alone, neither religious teachings, morality or rights of the individual, It certainly cannot be judged on all of them, they are too diverse.
The only view that all should share is that democracy is right! Therefore "EVERYONE" in the UK should have their rights upheld and be given a vote on "MARRIAGE".
I can already imagine those on both sides without a sense of conviction rushing to argue against it in case the vote should go against them. The government like them or loathe them are elected to make political decisions on our behalf, the question here is far from being just political and therefore it should be given to the people to decide. END OF
This comment has been removed.
07:26 on 22/04/2012
Surely the fundamental issue here is not sexuality but love & a desire to share your life with one person? To deny anyone that right is a breech of their human rights? We are talking about love not Religion; you cannot condemn a gay couple when some many dangerous men are priests & they are often protected by their religion for their acts; would God condone that? If what you are saying is that the church cannot or will not move with the times then perhaps we should go back to burning strange little old ladies as witches? And no, before you slam me as gay I am a married, hetrosexual man who is sick of the double standards we perpetrate in society when we hide behind faith, politics et al.
10:42 on 22/04/2012
Homosexuals are not being denied the right to live together, only about marriage, especially in a Christian church.
11:00 on 22/04/2012
We are not asking to get married in the church we just want the same as people that get married outside the church.
13:01 on 22/04/2012
So your only issue is with homoesexuals? Why not stop rapists being married in church, murderers? Surely they are sins against Christianity? Once you start to turn a blind eye to injustice you will never see clearly again. Didnt the Nazi regime say that it was only Jews that couldnt be classed as members of the Reich only to include homosexuals, the elderly, gypsies, disabled; in fact anyone who didnt comply to their ideals? Do you not feel a modicum of doubt creep in when you speak for God without knowing his true feelings; surely Christianity is about love and forgiveness - there can be no exceptions? If you can argue that there are exceptions are you not then a non-believer in the faith?
photo
Mneme
The truth shall make ye fret.
04:12 on 22/04/2012
I respect the efforts of the individuals involved to represent the diversity of views on homosexuality within different Christian institutions, but as the article shows, Christianity's stance on gay marriage is largely irrelevant. Should same sex marriage become legal it will still be illegal to hold a ceremony on religious premises, as it is with civil partnerships. A church could not sanctify a gay marriage even if they wanted to, so I don't see why any faith group feels they need to interfere in a civil law which will have no effect on their freedom of religion.
photo
Mac Howard
Thank god we got convicts, you got the puritans
03:57 on 22/04/2012
I think the acceptance of civil unions indicates that these have realised they're losing both the moral and practical battles and are trying to restrict their losses.
03:57 on 22/04/2012
disgusting and wrong on every level.
photo
JDuck
Until we know the equal we'll never feel the free.
06:57 on 23/04/2012
Prove it.

Without resorting to quoting snippits from an anceint collection of fragmented texts filled with legends of deities and demons.
13:37 on 23/04/2012
don't need to prove it because it's just my opinion and that of most right minded people.homosexuality is an unfortunate affliction and is to be pitied not normalised.pity that it was ever made legal.nasty,promiscuous deviants!
03:25 on 22/04/2012
gay marriage is so wrong, wrong, wrong. hope this gay marriage falls flat. not natural at all no matter what the gays think.
10:44 on 22/04/2012
Not natural? Neither is flying in a airoplane or wearing shoes. Surely the test of whether something is wrong is whether it does anyone any harm. And if anyone is claiming that god is harmed then let him speak for himself, and that means an explanation - not just a couple of oblique references in a 2000 year old book.
12:03 on 22/04/2012
your aeroplane and shoe references are stupid. yes they are not natural but necessity and beneficial for all human beings. i follow no religion, so what i am saying is that normal people get married and have kids and get on with their lives. now gays want that same thing even though they cant have kids because obviously being same sex. then the lesbians want artificial insemination and the gays want to adopt. all wrong.
00:44 on 22/04/2012
Same-sex marriage is a deviaion from God's laid down rules in the Holy Book - The Holy Bible. A true Christian believes in Christian doctrine and has the Bible as his/her guide book. Marriage as defined in the Bible is "the unification of a Man and a Woman". Why would a Bishop who aught to know better encourage a practice that contravenes the Christian doctrine?
photo
Mac Howard
Thank god we got convicts, you got the puritans
03:44 on 22/04/2012
Perhaps because he realises that the same book clearly promotes slavery and that it isn't an infallible guide to morality.
photo
Mneme
The truth shall make ye fret.
04:17 on 22/04/2012
True, no church in the world can boast 100% obedience to biblical law, as can be seen from the conspicuously corner-less beards of so many clergymen.
06:03 on 22/04/2012
The Bible does not promote slavery. The only reference to it is Jesus saying that slaves should respect their masters, as in workers. Why can't you non believers stop putting your feet in your mouths?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
00:00 on 22/04/2012
Sorry all - besides contacting your MP, please also sign the petition at the link below - join the other near half million who have had enough of this nonsense.

www.c4m.org.uk
photo
Mac Howard
Thank god we got convicts, you got the puritans
03:48 on 22/04/2012
This "nonsense" won't go away until this half million start to treat their fellow human beings with the respect they deserve.

It won't be long now before the objection to equality of marriage is seen with the same contempt that we now have for objections to inter-racial marriage.
06:05 on 22/04/2012
So what will be the next objectionable thing that will be treated as normal, child porn.?? Funny how no one so far has commented on this.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
16:43 on 22/04/2012
Please do not confuse the issue.

Marriage is the union betwen a man and a woman (which can, obviously, be between a man and a woman of different races). There is no such thing however as marriage between two men, or three men, or two women, or three men and two women, a dog and a man, a sports car and a woman or any other ridiculous grouping that can be proposed.

Homosexuals should indeed have rights, but they should not be made a laughing stock, which this would do. It would lessen respect, not increase it.
10:37 on 22/04/2012
Do you really not have anything better to do with your time than boycot something that has nothing to do with you. We are not asking church's to give us marriage. We are asking the law makers ( not bigots like you ) to give us gays the same right as a people that do not wih to marry in your church.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
17:00 on 22/04/2012
Michael, Michael,

What is with the mud-slinging and calling people bigots? And, please, do tell me which "my" church is.

As you will know, marriage is the union of a man with a woman. You, Michael, if you are a man, have the right to marriage, outside or inside a church, to a woman, like everyone else. Do not get confused. No-one has the right to "marry" someone of the same sex - it is, as you know, a nonsense to suggest otherwise. I like my hat, a lot, but cannot marry it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
23:41 on 21/04/2012
I see my comment was unacceptble to the "right-thinkers".

Here it is again.

Marriage is the union between a man and a woman. To claim otherwise is to indulge in Orwellian Newspeak. Homosexual equality will be damaged by pursuing this line. No more of this nonsense - get your MPs to call time on it and bring sense back to government.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
22:40 on 21/04/2012
Huff Post.
After today, seeing so many comments that have been removed by yourselves and your "trusted moderators" that in no way could be interepeted as violating your guidelnes.eg a comment by "jimbraid1" whos comment was on the lines of that " what the views of the queen would be on this subject as she is the head of the C of E". This comment was removed twice. WHY.
-
Has anyone a good, viable reason for it ?