London Olympics Will Cause Air Traffic Congestion 'Challenge', Admits NATS Boss

PA  |  Posted: 22/04/2012 11:54 Updated: 22/04/2012 12:03   PA

The transport chief tasked with flying 500,000 visitors to Britain for the Olympics has admitted: "It's quite a challenge."

The London terminal control general manager for National Air Traffic Services (Nats), Paul Haskins, will be responsible for organising thousands of aircraft jetting in and out of the capital for the summer showpiece - and avoiding a catastrophic mid-air collision.

He has cancelled leave for 360 air traffic controllers as Nats prepares to deal with 4,000 extra flights destined for airports serving the Games.

Staff have undergone special radar training to monitor newly-restricted airspace around London and cope with 700 extra airliners and more than 3,000 executive jets flying in and out of South East airports over three weeks before, during and after the Olympics.

The zone surrounding London from which private planes, hot air balloons and microlights are banned will increase by up to 30 miles in all directions to cut the chance of a mid-air crash between a private plane and a jumbo jet packed with sports fans.

The month-long restrictions, which come into force on July 16, cover as far north as Stansted, south to Weymouth, east to the Thames estuary and west to Oxford.

Military chiefs fear pleasure pilots could accidentally stray across the widened boundaries, leaving air controllers unclear as to whether it is a genuine mistake or a hijacked plane destined for the Olympic Stadium in Stratford, east London.

"During the Olympics if you start infringing London's airspace and you're heading towards one of the key stadiums, the Ministry of Defence is likely to see you as a threat," Mr Haskins said in an interview with the Press Association.

"The Civil Aviation Authority is responsible for uncontrolled airspace.

"We have done a lot of work with them in terms of education because we don't want light aircraft and microlights getting confused about what is and isn't controlled airspace and wandering into an air lane we wouldn't want them in."

Experts at Nats, responsible for airspace used by commercial airliners, will be the first to know if a plane enters restricted skies, triggering automatic responses which could lead to the RAF launching its Quick Reaction Alert Typhoons to intercept suspect aircraft.

Two fighters were launched earlier this month when a private helicopter failed to respond to warnings, leading to one Typhoon breaking the sound barrier over central England and creating a sonic boom heard by millions.

Mr Haskins said: "Our role is to accommodate the RAF in whatever it deems appropriate in terms of risk assessment and deciding what's a threat.

"If a national security event is declared through the Government and RAF, civilian air traffic is moved out of the way."

He added military commanders would not have "the luxury" of knowing whether an unidentified plane was a small plane with a lost pilot or a hijacked jet with a terrorist intent on mass murder at the controls.

"The MoD just knows there is an aircraft in airspace it shouldn't be, heading towards a populated area," said Mr Haskins.

"They will have to do a risk assessment and you might find there is a security response to that flight because they are trying to work out if it is a threat."

Another issue which could affect the Games is the potential for queues at airports' border controls, which could have a knock-on effect for flights meaning delays and disruption,

Earlier this month MPs revealed their concerns that Heathrow might struggle to cope with increased demand, sparking fears of long waits for immigration checks, which could lead to passengers being kept on planes after landing, clogging up aircraft parking spaces and creating congestion on aprons, forcing officials to "stack" jets in the sky.

Mr Haskins said planes could be held at departing airports to avoid putting too much stress on destination airports and said it was unlikely controllers would need to put jets into holding patterns.

He said systems were in place so Nats could warn airlines of congestion, meaning pilots of London-bound lanes could be ordered not to take off from European airports - minimising pressure at South East terminals.

"We have regular telephone conferences with airports throughout the day where we are looking at forecast demand for the next three to four hours," he said.

"They advise us in terms of what they can handle and we will regulate the airspace and flows of aircraft to meet whatever the airport has declared its capacity to be."

He added: "We don't get into a situation where they ring us up and say, 'No more, thank you very much.'"

As well as the extra planes bringing fans, Olympics officials, athletes and media to the capital, three aircraft will hover over Games' venues providing television footage of events like the marathon and road cycling, with another three nearby.

And the demands of American television have placed a rather more unusual burden on airspace regulation so one channel can bring its audience a bird's-eye view of the Olympic Park.

Mr Haskins said: "The broadcaster NBC is chartering an airship for the whole of the Games from where it will present its coverage."

FOLLOW UK

The transport chief tasked with flying 500,000 visitors to Britain for the Olympics has admitted: "It's quite a challenge." The London terminal control general manager for National Air Traffic Serv...
The transport chief tasked with flying 500,000 visitors to Britain for the Olympics has admitted: "It's quite a challenge." The London terminal control general manager for National Air Traffic Serv...
Filed by Chris Wimpress  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:07 PM on 04/23/2012
perfect time for civil servants to stage there next strike action, the goverment will have to take notice if there beloved show piece would be effected, bring it on
10:31 AM on 04/23/2012
The government will love this, another great way of raising tax revenue. X amount per plane and per passenger. Love it.
09:17 AM on 04/23/2012
It's the London Olympics, not the UK Olympics. This is not a problem that is unexpected, now is it? And why are they allowing up to 3000 extra private jets when they could presumably use at least some of those slots for airliners?
11:51 PM on 04/22/2012
The problem will be caused by those of us who wish to fly out, not in.
11:15 PM on 04/22/2012
The Olypic will have to move the high jump out of london as evan the English high jumper jumps higher than that plane shown in the picture above
10:55 PM on 04/22/2012
Now I am worried - if the London terminal control general manager for National Air Traffic Services thinks that Weymouth is south of London (actually it is considerably further west than his westernmost limit of restrictions at Oxford), then we are all in trouble...cancrl my flight now!
08:12 PM on 04/22/2012
As long as the event makes Lord Cohen some money I don't suppose he will care at all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
06:27 PM on 04/22/2012
I wonder how all the other countries who hosted the games managed then.........DOH.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gumpo
03:30 PM on 04/22/2012
I dare say there will be problems during the Olympics, mainly because in this Country we put all our eggs in one basket rather than sharing around, the basket being London !!
Lets face it we've only had 7 years notice of these Olympics to prepare !!
This comment has been removed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
Two 'alves of coconut!
01:31 PM on 04/22/2012
You see planes that low to the ground over a residential neighborhood, and you have to ask, 'is there any way to separate fixed ground structures with people living in them, and that hurtling mass of metal loaded with fuel'? Problem is, they built airports, and then cities grew up around them, and invariably, developers go after that flight path real estate. Then, eventually, something breaks or falls off like with that DC-10, or in more severe examples where engine failure or other circumstance results in a flaming residential fuel-soaked pancake like with that F-18, and it's frankly a small wonder and miracle that it doesn't happen more often.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
02:46 PM on 04/22/2012
Thank you for your sanguine thought concerning air disasters - it makes all feel so much more safe..., most reassuring...

another anecdote: I was at Windsor Castle some years ago, and I overheard a group of American & Canadian visitors talking.
They noticed the series of aircraft taking off from Heathrow, and one turned to the group and said:
'You'd have thought the Queen would have built her castle away much further away from the Heathrow flightpath, wouldn't you?'...

and someone else who remembers DC10s and their 'optional detachable' cargo doors...
05:01 PM on 04/22/2012
Growth of communities used to be true for railways, not true for airports.
Just to check, build an airport and see how many houses arrive. :O)
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
10:53 PM on 04/22/2012
Or... as in the case of my husband's family, they bought a really nice house in the London suburb of Hounslow, and two years later someone built an aeroport just a few miles away. My in-laws are long gone, but when he took me to see the house where he grew up the planes came over as low as the one in the photo. The noise was deafening.
01:26 PM on 04/22/2012
Wait for it England the government are about to create another TAX to screw you..............
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Fowler
I try....I really do!
12:23 PM on 04/22/2012
I read and believe that Heathrow is running at about 98% capacity, so I find it hard to see what "extra" traffic could be coming in there? I also assume Gatwick is also running at high capacity and so i see the idea of "potential for queues at airports' border controls, which could have a knock-on effect for flights meaning delays and disruption" simply a pre prepared line to cover us letting a few hundred thousand enter the UK with a smile and wave bypassing passport control?

Once again, its all about London; forget the half dozen or so regional airports(within and hour and half from London) that COULD take some of the "everyday" traffic from the capitals airports. Why are people from the south coast forced to travel to London to fly to Egypt or Florida from London?

There is NO plan for air transport in the UK; no one seems to understand that having millions of people travelling to London simply adds to the pressure on our infrastructure, when spending money on local airports aids growth, supports job generation and offers a choice to millions that they do not have at the moment.

Time to remember that the UK is not ONLY within the M25.
12:52 PM on 04/22/2012
Well said Roy ! I have occasional difficulties in convincing people that Glasgow is, actually, NORTH of Watford !
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
10:55 PM on 04/22/2012
=LOL=
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
02:36 PM on 04/22/2012
Inconveniently, Roy, most of the venues of the Olympics are in London and the South East, so it's hardly surprising that visitors will head for one of five London airports.

It's quite feasible to extend the opening hours of both LHR and LGW for a month to cater for this international event, but I suppose that would be altogether too simple a solution..

Incidently, nobody forces people from the south coast to travel to London to fly to Egypt or Florida... if there were sufficient demand at, for example, Southampton or Bournemouth, then I'm sure a commercial airline would be only too pleased to run a service to Egypt - if it was profitable; it evidently isn't.
You'd also have great difficulty running 777, 767, 747, A380, etc services into either of the aforementioned airports anyway, so getting to Florida from them wouldn't be feasible.

So, no surprise that there will be congestion around London 2012, coinciding as it does with the high summer travel season, but - call me naive if you like - but did nobody identify this problem earlier? ...so we'll see.

There is a national plan for air traffic, but with commercial companies only using airports from which they have a reasonable possibility of making a profit, the concentration around London's five airports will continue.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gumpo
03:27 PM on 04/22/2012
Re the airports, I think you answered your own question about the difficulties of flying from airports outside of London by saying about the aircraft sizes.. And to say theres no demand for for flights outside London isn't correct, London flights are filled with people who travel from all over the South, South west as it's their only available option. The main problem is the Govt won't allow airports to be built in these areas.