Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt Refuses To Resign Over BSkyB Claims

Posted: 24/04/2012 19:35 Updated: 24/04/2012 20:41

Culture secretary Jeremy Hunt has defied Labour calls for his resignation following claims that he secretly backed News Corporation's bid to take over satellite broadcaster BSkyB.

Mr Hunt insisted that he had conducted the process of deciding whether to green-light the BSkyB bid with "scrupulous fairness" and wrote to the Leveson Inquiry asking to be given an early date to give his side of the story in formal evidence, the Press Association reported.

In a dramatic development on Tuesday, the Leveson Inquiry into press standards released a 163-dossier of emails detailing contacts between the culture secretary's office and a senior executive at News Corp.

Labour said the documents showed that Mr Hunt failed to fulfil his quasi-judicial role in relation to the proposed takeover, which he had promised to carry out in a "fair and even-handed" way.

And they said that David Cameron also had questions to answer, after News Corp executive James Murdoch told the Inquiry that he and the prime minister had briefly discussed the BSkyB bid in December 2010 - days after business Secretary Vince Cable was stripped of his decision-making power on the takeover.

Downing Street insisted that the culture secretary still had the prime minister's full confidence.

But Labour leader Ed Miliband said Mr Hunt must resign and warned Mr Cameron he too had "questions to answer".

"I myself have said all politicians, including Labour, became too close to the Murdochs but this is in a completely different league," said Mr Miliband.

"We have Jeremy Hunt engaging in detailed discussions with a party, News Corporation, that is bidding to take over BSkyB and he is supposed to be the impartial judge.

"There are also questions for David Cameron to answer because now we know that just after Vince Cable was stripped of responsibility for the BSkyB takeover and it was passed to Jeremy Hunt, he, David Cameron, was having discussions with James Murdoch and others.

"We need to know what happened in those discussions. So there are questions for Jeremy Hunt to answer, there are also questions for David Cameron, George Osborne and the whole government to answer."

In a statement Mr Hunt said: "Now is not a time for knee-jerk reactions. We've heard one side of the story today but some of the evidence reported meetings and conversations that simply didn't happen.

"Rather than jump on political bandwagon, we need to hear what Lord Justice Leveson thinks after he's heard all the evidence.

"Let me be clear my number one priority was to give the public confidence in the integrity of process. I asked for advice from independent regulators - which I didn't have to do - and I followed that advice to the letter.

"I would like to resolve this issue as soon as possible which is why I have today written to Lord Justice Leveson asking if my appearance can be brought forward. I am very confident that when I present my evidence the public will see that I conducted this process with scrupulous fairness."

The calls for Mr Hunt's resignation followed the release of the dossier detailing contacts between the culture secretary's office and senior News Corp executive, Frederic Michel.

In a series of emails to James Murdoch and other executives, Michel - then the company's director of public affairs in Europe - reported on Hunt's thoughts about the progress of the controversial takeover plans, which were dropped in July last year amid the furore over phone-hacking at the News Corp-owned News of the World.

In one message Michel detailed what the culture secretary would say to Parliament the next day, noting that it was "absolutely illegal" for him to obtain the information.

Another email, dating from January last year, reported Mr Hunt's belief that it would be "game over" for opponents of the BSkyB takeover once plans to spin off Sky News into a separately listed company were publicly announced.

"He said we would get there at the end, and he shared our objectives," Michel noted.

Although many of the emails refer directly to Michel having spoken to "JH", he told the inquiry that in fact this was shorthand for contacts with the culture secretary's office - usually his special adviser, Adam Smith.

The Labour leader said Hunt had been shown to be "acting in the interests of the Murdochs, not the British people" and should resign.

"He himself said that his duty was to be transparent, impartial and fair in the BSkyB takeover. But now we know that he was providing advice, guidance and privileged access to News Corporation. He was acting as a backchannel for the Murdochs," he said.

"He cannot stay in his post. And if he refuses to resign, the prime minister must show some leadership and fire him."

Raising a point of order in the Commons, deputy Labour leader and shadow culture secretary Harriet Harman said Mr Hunt's conduct had fallen "woefully short" of the standard expected.

Quick Poll

Will Jeremy Hunt still be in a job by the weekend?

VOTE

She called on him to apologise to the Commons and resign from David Cameron's Cabinet.

"In view of the evidence that has been adduced before the Leveson Inquiry today it appears that the secretary of state has fallen woefully short of the standards expected by his office and by the public interest," Harman told MPs.

"I believe, on a point of order, that the right thing for the secretary of state to do would be to come to this House to offer an apology and to tender his resignation."

But Downing Street insisted that the culture secretary still had the prime minister's full confidence.

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Culture secretary Jeremy Hunt has defied Labour calls for his resignation following claims that he secretly backed News Corporation's bid to take over satellite broadcaster BSkyB. Mr Hunt insisted ...
Culture secretary Jeremy Hunt has defied Labour calls for his resignation following claims that he secretly backed News Corporation's bid to take over satellite broadcaster BSkyB. Mr Hunt insisted ...
Filed by David Hobbs  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 93
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredro
11:18 AM on 04/25/2012
If Hunt's involvement in the BSyB affair was an example of 'transparent, impartial....xrupulous fairness' in a quasi-judicial situation, I must say I would not like to be on (what he deemed) the wrong side if he were judge in a court-case. Giving hints as to winning procedure to one of the parties scarcely amounts to impartiality.
08:13 AM on 04/25/2012
The powers to be sacked Cable give the job to Hunt for what reason ... To be user friendly to the Murdoch family ?
08:01 AM on 04/25/2012
If he has Camerons full confidence he should go quickly ' remember Fox and co they also had his kiss of death.,
07:58 AM on 04/25/2012
I think James Naughtie got his name right first time.
07:57 AM on 04/25/2012
It would seem that there has been corruption right at the top of the Tory party for some time and what has gone on would be worthy of a plot in a Jeffrey Archer novel, rather than actually happening in our once great country, time for trust me Dave and Co to be held to account.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:49 AM on 04/25/2012
Just how many Liam Fox's is it possible for one government to contain?
07:01 AM on 04/25/2012
Well it looks like that spoonerist slip of the tongue on Radio 4's Today programme a few months ago was factually correct. Jeremy Hunt the Culture Secretary ... now he's made himself look like a complete culture secretary!
06:59 AM on 04/25/2012
Perhaps it was all Labours fault.
06:55 AM on 04/25/2012
Time for this Government to be dissolved. No further comment necessary.
06:34 AM on 04/25/2012
Hunt has Cameron's backing, he'll go.
06:29 AM on 04/25/2012
With the Hunt emails The Murdochs have revenged themselves on this craven corrupt country.
They have trashed the place as they leave- an effective example of a slash and burn strategy.

Brits have been so complacent; they have their moans and their grumbles but intrinsically they are satisfied - they trust the system and the national myth about fair play.

Brits love to snipe and mock what happens abroad, but meanwhile things were crumbling at home and no one noticed. The security services and a prime minister lied and sent young people to die in the desert. Politicians and bankers almost bankrupted the county.

While soldiers were dying abroad and while you were breaking your back trying to keep your job in the wake of redundancies in your workplace- politicians, Murdoch, the press and the police were buying and trading this once proud nation.

Britain is caught up in 'The Wire'- the press, police and politicians riddled with iniquity at the top. These vested interests have trashed the essence of this country. If this was happening in France- Brits would be pointing and laughing, saying- 'we always knew it.'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredro
11:30 AM on 04/25/2012
I'm not sure you can say 'things were crumbling at home and no one noticed'. YOU may not have noticed (or noticing, not have done, or had the power to do, anything about it), but I have had the distinct impression of endless criticism of 'things...crumbling', but those in power paying little or no attention; or, as in this case, trying to brazen it out. News International's problems, for example, have arisen from considerable popular opposition to their BSkyB attempted takeover, in the face of Governmental resistance or indifference to such opposition. The Telegraph's crusade on MPs' expenses would never have happened in the deferential, complacent 1950s. The question is: does such criticism contribute to, even cause, or counteract any such crumbling?
12:49 PM on 04/25/2012
Brits moan *a lot*; read the comments section of The Telegraph or the Daily Mail but fundamentally they still believe in the righteousness of Great Britain.

I dont think shining a light on the venality, corruption and decay hastens the crumbling, it affords the opportunity for change- at least superficially and for a limited period.

It was ever thus- there is a reason 'Perfidious Albion' has been a phrase in common usage for many centuries. Britain didnt get a Empire by playing nice. The difference now is the level of scrutiny.

There is a line in 'The Wire' where a Police Commissioner is accused of being willing to tolerate living in filth to avoid being seen to work a shovel- it applies here too. The wrong doers arent ashamed until they get caught.

This whole the Murdoch Mire rose out of them being complacent- for years journalists and politicians knew it was going on. All that's changed is the political climate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saumya Shrivastava
Broke is only temporary; poor is a state of mind
05:23 AM on 04/25/2012
http://liveoncampus.com/wire/show/3369915
Here is that one video showing James Murdoch telling the Leveson Inquiry that he did speak to David Cameron about News Corp's bid for BskyB at a dinner party held by Rebekah Brooks.
There is a long history between the Murdochs and Cameron that's true! going back to when he was just leader of the opposition! I can't beleive he thought he could get away with lieing about that!
06:54 AM on 04/25/2012
...I just watched your the Video... yes you're right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
02:17 AM on 04/25/2012
Murdoch will have his revenge for arresting his GF. A head or two will roll. By this time on Friday all will be roses roses and monday it will be business as usual. We who witness will gnash our teeth and the 90% of the population who sleepwalk their way through life will watch another episode of eastenders.
cantabria
my default position is wrong
06:29 AM on 04/25/2012
Yes and for the next 6 months or longer this gravy train of mutual ..... between politicians, newspaper, televison and celebrities will continue, meanwhile Leveson (who he?) and his cronies continue to rake in the dosh for, as far as I can see, doing very little. I don't like eastenders or just about anything on tv at the moment, it all seems to be a plot to try and force people to get sky, by just broadcasting celebrity or reality or cooking but when I switch on the news and once again they are talking about this rubbish I end up with Russia Today, they don't seem to be part of the party.
06:55 AM on 04/25/2012
Cheer up comrade
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Miserable Swine
10:14 AM on 04/25/2012
I was watching Julian Assange on RT today - great stuff with an ex-leftist and some Italian guy arguing about the finer points of American politics. RT has an anti-west agenda, but at the end of the day, I still watch it as a counterbalance to the equally biased stuff produced here.
06:32 AM on 04/25/2012
Go on then what's wrong with Eastenders?
08:05 AM on 04/25/2012
What's wrong with eastenders ???? Phils dumped Shirley and Billys hair has been on Sanatogen that's what
This comment has been removed.
01:10 AM on 04/25/2012
if JH has to go, then he would always be given a job within the Murdoch Empire as Cameron and Osborne will no doubt.
01:18 AM on 04/25/2012
They have in the past gone many times to see Murdoch for Instructions at a UK Plc Board - Meeting whereby Murdoch talks, and Cameron, and Co; listens.
01:27 AM on 04/25/2012
yep, Murdoch says 'jump' and Cameron and Co ask 'How high?'