A striking and sharp design is not something we’d usually associate with green cars, so Chevrolet’s new Volt certainly looks like a breath of fresh air. The sleek and sculpted looks help with the ...
A striking and sharp design is not something we’d usually associate with green cars, so Chevrolet’s new Volt certainly looks like a breath of fresh air. The sleek and sculpted looks help with the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:49 AM on 05/23/2012
All they done with is sold you a 1400cc car that has an electric motor but you probably find out you will have to lease the batteries ,you will never own them ,and this car can only be serviced at a GM garage therfor protecting their investment or rather the money your going to invest in them
Check out the service intervals and what they cost then reach for the heart attack pills
They wont tell you all of the costs involved over time because you would not buy one .

Or in other words , your trapped once you bought it because they are going to make more more money out of the servicing than you want to know about ,its called captive market .
10:26 AM on 05/23/2012
Fit an electric car with lead acid batteries and it will about 30miles ,fit lithium batteries and it will go a lot further ,fit a car with lithium batteries or better and then fit a 6hp diesel engine driving a compound gear box driving a generator then you will have over a 100 mpg ,but then the government would loose to much in tax revenue on fuel and the parts .

Why would anyone fit a 1400cc engine into an electric car ,ans they still have to pay road tax for a 1400 cc car !

Truth is the government cant afford to let you have cheap transport they would loose to much money !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:41 PM on 05/10/2012
The car is to be further developed and made in China
http://therealrevo.com/blog/?p=64124
11:36 PM on 05/10/2012
Where does this electricity come from, anyway? Probably the national grid, so you are burning just as much oil based fuel, emitting just as much CO2 as you would be if you fill up at a standard petrol station. Like the hydrogen powered car, electric cars are a non starter in terms of the green environment. Mind you, that's also a non starter, unless you're a tax collector.
04:11 PM on 05/19/2012
Only if you charge at peak times; overnight the national grid is primarily nuclear and wind power (though obviously some nights there may be less wind than others). However, even if it was only conventional power stations the CO2 emissions from an electric car charged by a coal power station are about half those for a car with an internal combustion engine.
05:45 PM on 05/19/2012
I don't agree with your figures and I'm a qualified chemist. Coal fired power stations, using steam turbines, even if fluidised bed furnaces, are way below the efficiency of big Diesels. Coal fired is losing out to oil based fuels, has been for years. The efficiency of ICE's has been rising for years and the sulphur emissions from them have been dropping. We used to call it fiddling the figues, the official name was interpretation of results. I am unconvinced by the stories - I mean interpretation of results - I am being told on wind power, hydrogen power or electric cars. Figures cannot lie, but liars can figure.
11:23 PM on 05/10/2012
Can someone please explain where the economy figure of 235.4 mpg came from. If the range is 300 miles, 30 miles on electric power before the petrol engine starts generating electricity, the 7.7 gallon fuel tank is then used in 270 miles giving a combined economy of 39mpg.
No one with any sense would spend £30K on one of these when you can buy cars such as the Ford Focus 1.6 diesel which will give 60+mpg and a range of over 800 miles for not much more than half the price of the Volt.
03:50 PM on 05/19/2012
When running on petrol the official combined consumption figure is 5.0l/100km. When running on electricity the combined figure is 0l/100km (the EU rules for fuel consumption ignore electricity consumption). Also measured according to the EU rules the electric range is 83km. For dual fuel vehicles such as this one the rules require those two figures to be combined in a weighted average over the total electric range plus 25km of the other range. (0*83)/(25+83) + (5.0*25)/(25+83) = 1.2l/100km or 235.4mpg as the official combined figure (actually it's about 1.15l/100km but they then round to one decimal place before converting to mpg).

If you want some real figures then try using the figures from nearly 1000 real US Volt drivers: converted from US mpg to UK mpg, the top 10% of Volts get better than 657MPG, 100MPGe, 50% of drivers get at least 211MPG/84MPGe, and 90% of Volt drivers get better than 87MPG/62MPGe (where MPG ignores electric miles and MPGe counts electric miles as 93MPG(US)/113.6MPG(UK)).
11:07 PM on 05/10/2012
Can someone please explain how an economy figure of 235.4 mpg was arrived at. If electric power only lasts for 30 miles and the 7.7 gallon fuel tank then extends the range to 300 miles, I make that an average of around 35 mpg. No one with any sense would spend 30K on one of these when you can buy a car such as the Ford Focus 1.6 diesel which will do 60+ mpg and has a range of over 800 miles.
This comment has been removed.