London 2012: British Olympic Association Loses Court Battle To Keep Lifetime Bans For Drugs Cheats

Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 29/04/2012 19:25 Updated: 29/04/2012 19:30

Dwain Chambers
Chambers will still have to qualify in order to compete at the London Olympic Games.

Former drugs cheat Dwain Chambers will be free to compete at the London 2012 Olympic Games after the British Olympic Association lost a battle to enforce lifetime bans, according to reports.

The BOA's policy was overturned at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (Cas) after a protracted fight with the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada), the BBC reported.

The decision means Chambers, 34, and cyclist David Millar, 35, who both served two-year bans for doping offences, are free to attempt to qualify for a place in Team GB.

It is expected that Cas will announce its formal decision on Monday.

Wada had said that the BOA's policy of lifetime Olympic bans after athletes served suspensions was not acceptable within its own codes.

The BOA wanted to keep the bans for taking performance enhancing drugs to dissuade other athletes from becoming tempted to cheat. It argued the drugs ban was part of its Olympic selection criteria, and not an extension of athletic bans.

But Cas said that the BOA's stance was unsupportable, and despite the support of the International Olympic Committee and many British athletes, the ban looks set to be overturned.

In a statement the BOA said: "The British Olympic Association can confirm that today, it has received from the Court of Arbitration for Sport the written decision in the arbitration between the BOA and the World Anti-Doping Association.

"As the decision is to be announced first by CAS, and out of respect for CAS and the Arbitration Panel, the BOA will be offering no comment today."

FOLLOW UK SPORT

Former drugs cheat Dwain Chambers will be free to compete at the London 2012 Olympic Games after the British Olympic Association lost a battle to enforce lifetime bans, according to reports. The BO...
Former drugs cheat Dwain Chambers will be free to compete at the London 2012 Olympic Games after the British Olympic Association lost a battle to enforce lifetime bans, according to reports. The BO...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
14:50 on 30/04/2012
"...if an athlete high on drugs can run the 100 metres in two seconds...we wanna bloody see it lol".
-Andy Parsons
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blockem1
When will our politicians start putting policies
10:12 on 30/04/2012
Let him take part if he is the best we have got , alter all don't we have a lot of passport athletes in the team , he is obviously dedicated to his sport and wants to win , he has been punished enough
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mokgee
Sabu.Satsang, Samsara, Solitude...
09:48 on 30/04/2012
He has served his debt to society, so leave him alone. Yes he cheated, but at that level it becomes a kind of paranoia to win, after all of that arduous dedicated training to compete. No it is not an excuse, however, murderers, rapists, ans paedophiles are all released early to continue with their programme of tyranny on society. Dwain, has probably served more time in the shadows from his favourite occupation,,Sport, than the rubbish mentioned here....
photo
hearthammer
If left is right and right is wrong, decide!
08:10 on 30/04/2012
If there's anybody left that is "excited" about these games, they surely will now just abandon their interest! What a farce!
01:15 on 30/04/2012
What hypocritical nonsense. There are few professional athletes who do play hurt and none who who play hurt without pain killers. If pain-killers are not considered perfromance-enhancing drugs, then someone does not speak English very well.
00:02 on 30/04/2012
Just let them compete,

This Dwaine chambers and David millar palavers have gone on for long enough.

Chambers has served his metaphorical jail time-let him run free (pun intended)
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
23:46 on 29/04/2012
How much money have the BOA wasted on this unwinnable and pointless legal struggle? Everyone in the know knew they would not win. What a stupid waste of time and resources all round. Muppets.
22:34 on 29/04/2012
Dwain Chambers and David Millar have served two-year bans for drugs. They've paid a penalty.

It's time that the BOA and IAC stopped imposing or attempting to impose lifetime bans, unless the violation of rules is something more serious than using performance-enhancing drugs: deliberate harm to another competitor, for example.

We've seen representatives of these committees disbar athletes who are taking meds legitimately prescribed by physicians to treat persistent physical or mental problems.

Yes, one should play by the rules, but the application of the rules sometimes brings to mind the words of Lewis Carroll:

“`I'll be judge, I'll be jury,' said cunning old Fury:
`I'll try the whole cause, and condemn you to death.'”

Better these committees followed the principle of the Mikado:

My object all sublime
I shall achieve in time —
To let the punishment fit the crime —
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
21:41 on 29/04/2012
Chambers will still have to compete against Usain Bolt.
A badly tuned (Drug affected) Lada versus a Ferrari.
If Chambers is the best we have- we should just accept that we haven't got the best!

I would urge all athletics fans to ensure he is booed and derided on each occasion he appears.
Regardless of the fact he may compete-if he does he is robbing a true athlete of an opportunity.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
22:01 on 29/04/2012
His body has long processed dem drugs. Its been years. But he can't compete against Bolt. Chambers has way too much muscles . He is built like a buildozer. Bolt is taller and slim .He can finish him.

I am just thinking of the late Flo Jo who is rumoured to have ingested enhancers. something that might I have killed her.They know the risks.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
22:08 on 29/04/2012
I too was conned by Flo Jo- Thought she was a brilliant athlete.
At least we know Chambers is not!
photo
AlanDente
Noses: made to hold glasses
23:51 on 29/04/2012
He seems a humble and likeable man, does our Dwain. Plenty of people make mistakes. The measure of a man is how he responds to his failings. Some people, once exposed, crumble and show how weak they really are. Chambers has been strong enough to continue to compete, even when marginalised and publicly reviled, and honest enough to admit his error and learn from it.

He can hardly be blamed for not being able to match the greatest sprinter of all time.

I have plenty of respect for someone who is prepared to give his all in the fact of difficult circumstances, even if they are partly of his own making. That's part of what it means to be human.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
18:28 on 30/04/2012
Mistakes are permitted- deliberate long term cheating is neither humble or likeable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mediumal57
Moderate Extremist
20:58 on 29/04/2012
Personally I think this decision, whilst legally inevitable, is morally bankrupt. One wonders however just what kind of case was presented by the BOA and whether they were entirely serious in their wish to enforce what they knew was a legally questionable ban. What if all or some even of the British Olympic Team now refused as a matter of personal conciounce to compete along-side these cheats? Would the IOC demand that they do? On what authority could they compel someone to betray their principles - should they wish to exercise them?

If I were a member of that team I would certainly refuse to be associated with this disgraceful pair, even if it meant sacrificing a medal chance. I would certainly applaud anyone of our athletes who did take such a stand.
22:57 on 29/04/2012
The question is not one of having gone public with information from MI-5 or MI-6, much less "Who shall ascend to the hill of YHWH?"

We're dealing here with physically mature individuals engaging in sport, not a congregation of the Amish or Jehovah's Witnesses shunning someone they consider an apostate. Nor are we inviting someone to tea, for cocktails, or to dinner. In these instances we may choose whom we like.

Everyone playing a sport should abide by the rules. These two did not and have been punished for their (mis)deeds. Now, speaking of rules, a superior authority has ruled that the two men in question may compete. If you or I refuse to compete, in what way does this punish those men? For punishment, or self-righteousness, is what he who refuses to compete in this instance is seeking. Is it sportsman-like, to say nothing of gentlemanly behavior, to treat Messrs Chambers and Millar as New Testament lepers?

Before you answer, you might want to consider something else from the NT: "Let that one of you who is without sin cast the first stone."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
mediumal57
Moderate Extremist
23:42 on 29/04/2012
But these men were not and will not be competing in isolation but wearing the colours of their country, which they have dishonoured and disgraced as well as more importantly themselves. If I as an individual, who had not cheated and have thereby honoured and respected myself my sport and my country would have every right not to want to be associated with such people. By accepting them onto my team, I would in fact be condoning their behaviour and thereby dishonouring myself.

Their allotted punishment really is not the issue with me. Call it self-rightousness if you like. But I'd rather be accused of that, than be a hypocrite. By the way, I am not a Christian, Muslim. Jew, Hindu or someone with any religious faith. I have never been in trouble with the law, stole anything, or committed any statutory crime that I know of.

One isn't after perfection here though. I would rather it just be accepted that the idea of cheating (especially in sport) be taken a little more seriously and utterly condemned. Those who cheat at sport are for me never to be trusted again. They are deeply flawed individuals as far as I'm concerned because they prize winning above the taking part, which was once the Olympic ideal. Sadly this is all to often overlooked these days. Their redemption can be sought in other ways.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
20:32 on 29/04/2012
Just in time to let them compete against drug cheats from other countries ;)
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
21:28 on 29/04/2012
I see you have fully embraced the olympic ideal!
(Something to hide- or guilt?)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
00:58 on 30/04/2012
Since I'm not competing, my drug use (or yours :) is only the business of the nearest law enforcement agency. May the London Olympic see a SAM missile installation on your building block!
20:24 on 29/04/2012
Runwita, i agree it's an absolute disgrace, once a cheat always a cheat, i would be to ashamed to show my face, i think the other athletes should refuse to compete with these cheats, a bad day for British Athletics.
19:48 on 29/04/2012
During all of the reporting of this story, no one seems to have thought about the poor drug free athlete that will lose his place to Chambers
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
20:33 on 29/04/2012
As long as he's drug free now, let him be.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
21:27 on 29/04/2012
He can never be drug free- His body has been enhanced by steroids. The effects are evident. Regardless of his having stopped using drugs he has gained an advantage by former use. let him be- never!
07:59 on 30/04/2012
You are absolutely right.