Cost Of Parliament Fig TreesTo Be Cut

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  Posted: 2/05/2012 11:40 Updated: 2/05/2012 12:47

The bill for maintaining indoor fig trees at Parliament has been slashed, it has been revealed.

The 12 trees and external shrubs at Portcullis House have been costing the taxpayer some £44,000 a year plus VAT for more than a decade.

But the Commons Commission hailed a renegotiation of the deal.

The contractor has agreed to donate the trees and shrubs - which were previously rented - to Parliament and cut its maintenance charge to £18,500 plus VAT.

A spokesman for the cross-party committee said removing the trees altogether would have meant installing "environmentally unfriendly" mechanical systems for regulating temperature, humidity and air quality, and sound proofing. That would apparently have cost £500,000, while annual running costs would have been up to £20,000.

The spokesman added: "The Commission welcomed the outcome of the renegotiation which has resulted in ownership of the trees, shrubs and equipment; no disruption to the area or harm to the trees; continued environmental sustainability and support to a small British company."

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:54 AM on 05/20/2012
There are 2 places on this planet where you get away with this c.r.a.p the good ole US of A and this country ,and its not just a new thing they have been doing this for years .
Someone came up with this fraud and then someone passed it as ok i think these peoples
names should be made public so we know who is ripping us off !
11:49 AM on 05/20/2012
This was just a figment of someones imagination !
09:24 PM on 05/03/2012
It would have been cheaper to plant 12 mp,s !
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:53 PM on 05/02/2012
"A spokesman for the cross-party committee said removing the trees altogether would have meant installing "environmentally unfriendly" mechanical systems for regulating temperature, humidity and air quality, and sound proofing. That would apparently have cost £500,000, while annual running costs would have been up to £20,000."....what a complete joke only the British parliment could comission a structure so unfit for purpose that they then have to spend £44,000 a year plus VAT just to try to make it usable. How about comissioning something that isn't complete junk in the first place for the fortune it cost? then they wouldn't have needed the fig trees. Can this bunch get anything right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
britalia56
05:09 PM on 05/02/2012
we have enough plant life on the inside
04:25 PM on 05/02/2012
down to 18.500,thats still over 1.500 per tree;what a load of rubbish. plant a few tulips and daffs
03:59 PM on 05/02/2012
Rubbish, what a scam 44,000 to upkeep 12 fig trees for one year, being cut to 18,500, i,ll look after them for £5000. Absolute scandal, what is it with governments? who do they think they are? and maybe if they stopped spouting off alot of hot air the air quality would be fine. Take us for fools, treat us like idiots, actually no, I,ll look after them, prune, water and feed for 1 million, probably would have got the contract!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ben Wilson
What's the story mourning Tories?
02:46 PM on 05/02/2012
Rent a tree? Give us an effing break!
02:24 PM on 05/02/2012
Scandalous.

Only an id.i0t would have signed that deal in the first place.
Or someone getting a bung.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
11:31 PM on 05/07/2012
My money would be on the latter possibility.