Belgrano Anniversary: Argentina Remembers 323 Killed In Controversial Falklands War Sinking

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 3/05/2012 13:57 Updated: 3/05/2012 14:27

Argentina has held a series of memorial services to mark the 30th anniversary of the sinking of the General Belgrano.

The cruiser, which was torpedoed by a British nuclear submarine on the 2 May 1982, resulted in the death of 323 crew, and remains one of the most controversial incidents of the conflict.

The attack on the ship was order by Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher while it was sailing outside the 200-mile exclusion zone implemented by the British. It was also heading away from the Falkland Islands when it was attacked.

After the sinking, the Tory leader argued that that vessel had posed a threat to Royal Navy shipping despite its positioning and its consequent destruction was therefore justified.

belgrano anniversary
Defence Minister Arturo Puricelli at a ceremony in Buenos Aires

Families of the victims attended various ceremonies in Argentina to mark the anniversary. In Buenos Aries, President Cristina Fernandez used the occasion to reaffirm her country’s claims on the islands, while Admiral Jorge Castro, one of the 770 survivor of the stricken cruiser, reminded the crowd that the mission was “not over”.

"There are 323 voices calling to us that there is an open wound," he said. "Every day they remind us that the Malvinas are, were and will be Argentine."

Fernandez has repeatedly asked the British government to open a dialogue on the islands’ sovereignty, but Whitehall has steadfastly refused to countenance any discussion, claiming the islanders' right to self-determination is paramount.

On Friday, the Argentine government screened a controversial advert that shows one of its Olympic athletes training on the Falkland Islands. The advert ran under the slogan: "To compete on English soil, train on Argentine soil".

Quick Poll

Was Margaret Thatcher right to order the sinking of the Belgrano?

VOTE

FOLLOW UK

Argentina has held a series of memorial services to mark the 30th anniversary of the sinking of the General Belgrano. The cruiser, which was torpedoed by a British nuclear submarine on the 2 May 1...
Argentina has held a series of memorial services to mark the 30th anniversary of the sinking of the General Belgrano. The cruiser, which was torpedoed by a British nuclear submarine on the 2 May 1...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 160
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richie2012
Your micro bio is empty.
01:26 PM on 06/12/2012
What a marvellous act that was. So clear and decisive. Yes there is an exclusion zone - but here is a chance to sink an enemy battleship and we're not talking about bombing Beunos Aries. An enemy has invaded a British Crown Dependancy and is likely to use this vessel of war to attack us. So we sink it! This is exactly the sort of move a good war leader should make. Whatever the bellyaching after the incident the fact remains - one large enemy warship who could have killed British and Falkland Islanders lies now at the bottom of the ocean.
02:20 PM on 05/06/2012
The Argies do tend to get the name of ship & places wrong - surely they mean USS Phoenix!!!!
01:58 PM on 05/05/2012
What hurts more than anything? Being ignored! Treat the Argies with the contempt they deserve - Ignore them completely!

And ban their competitor from the Games here until the Government offer a full public apology.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilEssex
Statistically, 6 out of 7 dwarves are not happy.
09:02 PM on 05/05/2012
Hear, hear totally agree terriminx2.
02:04 PM on 05/04/2012
perhaps we should send an olympic athlete to run all over there war memorial, you started the conflict argentina, take responsability for your actions
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mirola
Read between the lines
01:42 PM on 05/04/2012
The are no rules in war. They go out of the window as soon as the bullets start flying.
01:15 PM on 05/04/2012
"the Malvinas are, were and will be Argentine"...wrong.. wrong .. wrong!!
If you attack Britain, expect your ships to be sunk again..and again.. and again!!
Hands off the British Falklands.
12:55 PM on 05/04/2012
Let them parade as much as they want.
Tragic loss of life but they shoud never have invaded and started the war.
The best thing they can do is sit back and remember they were well and truly thrashed by a far superior military force wich was half the size of theirs.
12:48 PM on 05/04/2012
After the Belgrano was sunk the rest of the Argentinian fleet stayed in port thus saving more loss of life both on both sides.
12:24 PM on 05/04/2012
Tbh the Argentians really should learn to back off, it doesnt matter how or why the islands are under our Sov', there are, get over it.

Maggie was right to sink the Belgrano. if we had not, we could be attending a memorial of lost lives caused by the Belgrano attacking ships on the edge of the exclusion zone.

We will never know, but end of the day you dont poke your fingers near to a fire, they still get burned.
01:17 PM on 05/04/2012
Wrong wrong wrong , Thatcher is a war criminal for sinking a retreating ship. Thats not the way we English win wars . She should be arrested and tried for mass murder
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhilEssex
Statistically, 6 out of 7 dwarves are not happy.
01:23 PM on 05/04/2012
What utter rubbish.
01:32 PM on 05/04/2012
Rubbish!!
11:53 AM on 05/04/2012
As has been said, War is War, I never understood why we didn't go and Bomb all thier ports and Airfields, and a host of other military targets that were being used to launch attacks on our forces. As a serving member of the armed forces at the time, most of us felt it was a very much gloves on campaign, and that we paid a high price in lives, letting the Argentinians of lightly just to appease the Americans and even some European countries. If it happened today we would be paying them out millions in compensation. Maggie was right to go in and take out the Belgrano, but wrong to leave them with Airfields to launch attacks against us.
12:51 PM on 05/04/2012
At last !! A comment that makes sense and is worth reading.
Well said.
01:17 PM on 05/04/2012
Well said. As an ex-Serviceman myself i couldn't agree more. We should have bloodied their own land as a warning.
This comment has been removed.
10:09 AM on 05/04/2012
should have been sunk at pearl harbour.
majdf18148
I have nothing to declare but my curiosity
09:26 AM on 05/04/2012
The semantics of where the ship was, what its intentions were et al are of no consequence. Argentina invaded British sovereign soil. They had overwhelming numerical superiority, a huge geographical advantage and surprise on their side. We had the heroic bravery of our troops, the courage of our then Prime Minister and the dogged determination to succeed. It is pointless to even debate the whys and wherefores, they invaded, we retaliated, they got beaten and we kept the islands as sovereign British territory. The Belgrano sinking was a major psychological blow to the enemy and for that reasom alone was justified.
This comment has been removed.
08:32 AM on 05/04/2012
I am afraid I have to disagree with most of the comments on this subject. The military "brains" knew where the Belgrano was as it approached the exclusion zone. They then advised Argentina that Belgrano was considered a threat and that as such it would be sunk if it entered the exclusion zone. The Argentines then ordered the Belgrano out of the zone and back to port. The ship did then do an about-turn and was heading away (already outside) from the exclusion zone. That is when we attacked and sank it. If we had not warned them and if it had not complied with orders to turn back I would agree with all the other posts this morning. It was a political decision taken by Maggie Thatcher, not a military one. Please do not send me any accusations of being, and I quote a previous comment, "a hairy arsed tree lover", as I come from a military familly and am very pro our armed forces.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
11:05 AM on 05/04/2012
I accept your sentiment Sir, but with the Argentinians there is no trust as todays television shows, training for the Olympics on Falklands soil, they are an untrustworthy nation and I am not convinced that they would not have turned the ship when they desired and returned to become offensive, war is war.
11:06 AM on 05/04/2012
You forget we were dealing with a bunch of unloved, unwanted duplicitous Dagos - I come from a military family as well and taking out the enemy is what the Royal Navy is for is not?
11:40 AM on 05/04/2012
Actually it is for our protection, not to attack and kill without good reason ! The Belgrano was not in any way threatening either the Falklands or ships when it was sunk. It was going back to port. There was no need to "kill" 323 sailors especially as we had warned them and they had conformed with our order to "about turn". I am sure the military members of your family, if they have come face to face with death, would agree that it is not a glorious thing and one should try to avoid aimless killing at all costs. It is only those who have not been involved with wars that think that killing people, especially in those numbers, is the right thing to do. I wonder if your family would feel as you do if you had been "on board". You are entitled to your opinions obviously but death should not be glorified and especially not justified when we had taken steps to warn them that it would be sunk if it continued, it did not but we still sank it. In my mind that was wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
02:01 PM on 05/04/2012
Yes Sir.