Heads May Boycott Controversial Reading Tests, Warns NAHT LEader

PA  |  Posted: 07/05/2012 06:37 Updated: 07/05/2012 06:37   PA

Reading Tests
Heads may boycott controversial reading tests

Headteachers could boycott the Government's controversial new reading test for six-year-olds if it is used "as a stick to beat schools with", a union leader warned on Monday.

Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, (NAHT) said there were fears that the check will be used to "attack rather than assess".

If this proves to be the case, heads could refuse to administer it, and set their own test instead.

Plans for a reading test were announced by ministers last year, amid fears youngsters with poor reading skills were slipping through the net.

The check, which is taken by pupils at the end of their first year of formal schooling (Year 1), is based on phonics, a system which focuses on sounds rather than recognising whole words, and has been promoted by the Government as the best way to boost reading standards.

Pupils are asked to sound out or decode a series of words, some of which are made up, to test their reading skills.

It will be administered across England for the first time this year.

In his speech to the NAHT's annual conference in Harrogate today, Mr Hobby said: "We fear that the pass rate for the new phonics screening check will be set at an arbitrary high level in order to fuel headlines about children failing to learn to read.

"There is not yet a robust evidence base for any particular pass rate.

"We don't see the need for this screening check - it is inferior to what most schools do already - but if it is to happen it should be used as a genuine diagnostic test, not a stick to beat schools with.

"And if it is used to attack rather than assess, that will be the end of the screening check as far as the NAHT is concerned.

"And we will happily work with our colleagues in other unions like the National Union of Teachers (NUT) to frustrate its further application."

Hobby told delegates that "nobody is saying our education system is perfect", but added it was important to remember the progress that has been made.

"Our schools have got an extra 200,000 children a year reading well, compared with 1995. We are not complacent. But it is pride in what we have achieved so far that will be the springboard to get to 100%."

Speaking before the conference, Mr Hobby gave details on how the NAHT would "frustrate" the reading test.

"What we would do is create our own reading test, administer it, and give it to parents, but we won't report on the data to government," he said.

"Parents will get all the information they need, but the Government won't get any statistics to damn the profession with."

He said that most schools already have their own reading tests in place, which cover more than phonics, and the union will use these to create a standard test.

The NAHT is likely to ballot members for a boycott before any action is taken, Mr Hobby added. His comments come just weeks after the NUT called for a campaign against the test, warning that pupils will be branded as failures at the age of five or six.

Delegates at the NUT's annual conference in Torquay passed a resolution arguing that the mandatory testing of phonics is "unnecessary and inappropriate".

They called for concerns to be raised with ministers about the test "at every opportunity" and for the NUT's executive to prepare a campaign, including a boycott, if the test is used towards league tables in the future.

FOLLOW UK EDUCATION

Filed by Lucy Sherriff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
16:59 on 07/05/2012
I understand that if a child cannot read more or less fluently by the age of seven they never will or will struggle very greatly to do so. A test at six therefore seems eminently sensible to me so that those who have fallen behind can be given more help.
13:37 on 07/05/2012
When I was at primary school in the 1950's, the emphasis was on reading, writing and arithmetic. We had reading and writing tests. At age 6, I had a reading age of 9, and very neat handwriting. We also had spelling tests. The slow ones had more attention and If you left primary, not up to standard, that was your fault, not the teacher. Of course, the other important thing we had, was respect and discipline.
photo
Connected Fella
Retired Navy Photographer, Motorcyclist, Traveler
10:59 on 07/05/2012
If the little nippers read the Huff Post, perhaps they should be held back :[
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
10:26 on 07/05/2012
Well they are the people that know and the experts on the ground so maybe they are right.
10:21 on 07/05/2012
This is just another test to flag failing schools. My school will be placed in a 'category' following this test as the year one children doing the test will fail as a result of the high score needed. The children in my class lack confidence and this clearly show in there work over all. They do phonics lessons well but have not yet grasped the fact that this needs to be applied to everything else they do, even though its pointed out ALL THE TIME!!! Surly the reading age test given to children over 6 yrs old is sufficient enough. Every piece of work they do now seems to be an assessment. There's big write, AFL, phonic dictation etc etc etc. It's just something else to put on teachers backs, as if we haven't got enough already!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevesheff
10:10 on 07/05/2012
We rely increasingly on parent to supplement our children's education, but the children who need the most support are those whose parents lack these skills themslves.
There's a lot to be gained from copying the example set by those African Caribbean communities that set up 'Saturday Schools' where their children receive 'supplementary education' to make up for what they're missing at school. It also enable both parents and the community to make it clear to their children how important eduication is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
10:29 on 07/05/2012
You hear bad grammar all the time, much substituted for many and vice versa, and that horrible phrase "see yu lata"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevesheff
17:26 on 07/05/2012
LOL! yes, Fozwords, I agree. The bad news is that such phrases as 'how are you? and ''do know what i mean?' are apparently disappearing from use because in the interests, of speed, text messages exclude these phrases that 'lubricate' normal conversations. It also excludes vowels. One of my pet hates is the conversion of nouns into verbs e.g. 'tasked'; 'googled',
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevesheff
10:05 on 07/05/2012
When I was a boy the teacher's job was to provide pupils with a rounded education, the most important aspects being numeracy and literacy. Teachers were professionals and could be relied on to understand the needs of their pupils and how to go about teaching them. However, the state got involved became obsessed with measuring everything, including how many hours per week were spent on each core subject and what standard they should meet. The result is that we have teachers who are under pressure not to teach the children but to meet 'standards' set by the powers above. As often happens, this leade to 'cheating' with some children not being entered for particular assessment tasts (SATS) to keep the overall scores up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
10:35 on 07/05/2012
My mother is 91 this year, she left school at 13/14 years old, she, when she could write was one of the neatest I had ever seen, her sister who was older also wrote in copperplate, her writing was simply beautiful and their spelling was perfect, so what is worng today, my grandmother never taught these sisters to write or spell she could hardly read or write, so why have educational standards fallen so badly, when they should be so much better than in my mothers day? Does technology i.e. mobile phones and text language have anything to do with it.
12:22 on 07/05/2012
I remember leaving junior school at the age of 11 with handwriting and spelling which became a talking point in my new secondary school. My spelling was good and my handwriting beautiful & immaculate. (Not my words) I was taught to write with italic pen and ink only, no biro felt pens etc. Nowadays my handwriting is still commented upon although it has changed over the years through using all manner of writing equipment. Some people even say they look forward to receiving my mails, cards etc just to see the writing. I remember back in my youth, right from the beginning, having lessons independently on handwriting and spelling, as with all core lessons, they are necessary. It is no good being a whiz engineer, scientist or whatever if your writing is unreadable through scrawl or mis-spelling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stevesheff
17:14 on 07/05/2012
Yes, my father started school in C.1928 in a village school that had two class rooms and left school aged 15 years. His spelling and numeracy were good, BUT he couldn't do calculus, solve quadradatic equations, carry out chemical titration etc. The thing is that the syllabus has got bigger as more and more topics have been added but nothing taken out. Something has to go, and unfortunately it's quality
09:17 on 07/05/2012
Children who cannot read well are left behind in the education system after the age of 7. They need to be able to read by that age, as the curriculum moves on in the assumption that they have sufficient reading skills. As a parent I have been in on a regular basis to assist children in early years who cannot read. It is very sad to see these children, who in many cases have illiterate parents, struggle to keep pace with their peers. These children need to be given extra assistance very early on in their education, to turn the situation around.
majdf18148
I have nothing to declare but my curiosity
09:01 on 07/05/2012
Head Teachers are public servants, paid for by our taxes. If the heads of the police or the armed forces said they wouldn't followw ministerial edicts they would be out on their ear. When will teachers actually appreciate too many of our children are lagging behind the children of other less developed countries, are leaning school unable toread and write to an acceptable standard and end up on the dole as a result.It's not all the teachers' faults, parents have a big part to play as well. But these tests should be introduced along with others to catch the underdeveloped skills of kids before it is too late to do anything about it!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:48 on 07/05/2012
What is it with teachers, do they feel they are above the rest of society? A test is to be introduced to ensure children have reached a required level of reading at six and do not get left behind. Response from cry-baby heads "you can't do that the school will get the blame if too many kids fail".
I think it is time for the Government to introduce a scheme where Headteachers are tested (yearly) to ensure they have reached a level of maturity equal to that of a six year old.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
19:05 on 07/05/2012
No teacher feels they are "above society". Plenty of teachers feel criticised and insulted by people who appear to know next to nothing about either schools, children or education.

You miss the point of the NAHT statement. The proposed test is TOO HARD for 6 year olds. Which is why the Heads are saying they will replace it with one more appropriate for the age group, particularly if the results are used as part of the ongoing campaign this government has, of attacking the state school system. It's an unjustified attack which some empty vessels not only condone, but welcome.

As the NAHT leader said, we are producing an extra 200,000 children reading well each year. This government, of course, would never use facts like these to actually DEFEND us from the many ignoramuses with an axe to grind about the country's educators.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
22:47 on 08/05/2012
@martini
I take it you are a teacher then. No, I didn't miss the point the NAHT were making. The test is too hard? Too many kids going to fail it? Teachers going to be held to account? I've got a plan - we'll reduce the standard of the test to the lowest common denominator so that everyone passes and then we'll look good. Sounds familiar?
Your snide remarks such as "empty vessels" and "many ignoramuses etc" reflect just the point I was making about teachers believing they are above society.
08:21 on 07/05/2012
Why are they shouting before they are hurt. Given the state of literacy in this country I would have thought that teachers need all the help thay can get.