Potters Bar Train Crash 'Will Reoccur' If Cost-Cutting Measures Go Ahead

PA  |  Posted: 06/05/2012 11:01 Updated: 06/05/2012 11:01   PA

Potters Bar
Tragedies like the one at Potters Bar will 'reoccur' if cost-cutting measures are taken

Tragedies like the Potters Bar train crash will reoccur if proposed cost-cutting measures are introduced on the railways, unions warned before the 10th anniversary of the disaster.

The Government is considering a Department for Transport-ordered report containing a number of options for cash-cutting across the UK rail network.

But transport unions say that if recommendations made in Sir Roy McNulty's review are implemented, they would spell the break-up of Network Rail and an end of its not-for-dividend status.

The result, they say, would be profit being put before safety.

This Thursday's anniversary of the Hertfordshire crash that claimed seven lives should serve as a "wake-up call" to ministers, the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union said.

More deaths are "inevitable" if cost cuts lead to repairs and maintenance being scaled back, boss Bob Crow argued.

He said: "Once again rail services are going to be run for profit, setting up the same poisonous set of conditions that led to problems in the past.

"If profits are the motive then repairs and maintenance work doesn't get done because people want to maximise returns for shareholders. This is what happened in the run-up to previous tragedies.

"Though they're not going for full-scale privatisation of Network Rail, they're talking about alliances where effectively the train-operating companies are calling the shots.

"We think the result will be further unnecessary deaths and injuries on the railways.

"The anniversary of the Potters Bar crash is a wake-up call 10 years on for the Government to look again and realise this is not the way to run a railway."

The report says it is "vitally important" that infrastructure managers and train operators have a "commercial interest in each other's costs and revenues".

One way of doing this would be through joint ventures or alliances between Network Rail and train operators, it suggests.

Simon Weller, national organiser of train drivers' union Aslef, said: "The system failures from Potters Bar are now being reintroduced into the rail industry by driving costs down and outsourcing work.

"This is how we ended up in the whole Potters Bar mess. We'll probably see more Potters Bars because the profit motive has been reintroduced into track, signalling and infrastructure work.

"Cutting corners with safety to keep costs down is likely."

But the government stressed that it took rail safety "very seriously".

Transport Minister Theresa Villiers said: "Our railways are as safe as they have ever been and the Government is clear that this good record needs to continue.

"The Office of Railway Regulation has a defined role in scrutinising the work Network Rail does to ensure passenger safety and both the regulator and the government take rail safety very seriously.

"It is vital that we reform the industry and drive down costs to get the more efficient service passengers and taxpayers deserve.

"Eliminating waste and inefficiency through smarter working can be done without jeopardising safety."

The government is expected to announce its decisions on the McNulty review later this year.

potters bar
Six passengers on the West Anglia Great Northern express - Austen Kark, Emma Knights, Jonael Schickler, Alexander Ogunwusi, Chia Hsin Lin and Chia Chin Wu - were killed in the Potters Bar crash.

They were in the train's fourth carriage, which became airborne after derailing and ended up getting wedged under the canopy of the station.

A seventh victim, Agnes Quinlivan, 80, was killed by falling debris as she walked close to Potters Bar station.

Network Rail admitted failings over the installation, maintenance and inspection of adjustable stretcher bars which keep a moveable section of a track at the correct width for train wheels.

It was fined £3 million last May, having pleaded guilty at St Albans Crown Court in Hertfordshire to breaching health and safety regulations

Mr Kark's wife, author Nina Bawden, 87, was badly injured in the crash.

She said of her late husband: "I think about him all the time."

But she was confident safety had improved in the past decade.

"I think they've done quite a lot since then," she said.

Memorial services to commemorate the disaster will be held on Thursday, including one at the memorial garden outside Potters Bar station and one at the local church of Our Lady and St Vincent.

Flowers will be laid and a minute's silence will be held at the memorial garden at 12:56pm, the time the train crashed.

FOLLOW UK

Tragedies like the Potters Bar train crash will reoccur if proposed cost-cutting measures are introduced on the railways, unions warned before the 10th anniversary of the disaster. The Government i...
Tragedies like the Potters Bar train crash will reoccur if proposed cost-cutting measures are introduced on the railways, unions warned before the 10th anniversary of the disaster. The Government i...
Filed by Lucy Sherriff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
10:59 AM on 05/07/2012
No, people don't necessarily want to "maximise" returns for their shareholders, the shareholders, aka frequently better called the finance sector, want their pound of flesh. End. If that means dead customers, we'll do a runner, and if you're too rude we'll take our money elsewhere. So there. Time one or two of these fancy, Ferrari driving investment managers reviewed life from behind bars for several years with fines to match the income, not some paltry slap on the wrist by a judge with a light weight understanding of just how much money is slopping around at this level. At he moment shareholders get away with murder, literally and a whole series of govts turn a blind eye. Time to make the blighters accept responsibility for the Companies in which they splurge their money and, if they don't like it, tough, maybe we should invent a new model of corporate investment which improves on this one. After all we invented this one in the first place and it worked fairly well until greed took over. Look at the interest Brunel's shareholders took in every decision.
10:02 AM on 05/07/2012
The answer to this problem must be to utilize the same solution by both Tory and Labour governments since the days of Maggie Thatcher which is privatization of course.

What more does one need than this magnificent panacea to all problems. It also means they can terminate their responsibilities for the organization, blame it on the directors, blame it on greedy shareholders, blame it on Offsomething, and concentrate their world class skills to solving other difficulties, 75% of which are decided by Europe anyway.

Have I forgotten that privatization of the railways has already been tried out by the Conservatives with Kenneth Clark as the minister in charge?

Today, our MPs can be little more than Parish Councillors in that case?
07:12 PM on 05/06/2012
Bring our transport infrastructure back under public control, and not leave it in the hands of privateers whose sole interest is shareholders profit!!
08:44 PM on 05/06/2012
there doesn't appear to be much difference in the safety records of the rail network under private or public ownership according to Wikipedia. Hitting things at crossings seems to be the biggest safety issue. Making the system public won't stop that.
01:52 AM on 05/07/2012
My thoughts are really that we've a better chance of improving safety etc under public ownership because we, the public would have a vested interest in it all. Now it's run for profit, and profit only..

I also wouldn't put too much of yr 'faith' in Wikipedia either, it's useful but not 100% of case info needed..
07:33 PM on 05/07/2012
Things being hit at crossings, is generally down to the 'thing' being where it shouldn't, having ignored warning signs and/or lights. The vast majority of serious railway accidents, since privatization, have been down to bad track maintenance. There was a time when track maintenance was carried out by railway people, but now they wouldn't know their wing rail from their stock rail.
08:44 PM on 05/06/2012
Spot on, should never have been put in the hands of those with two eyes on profit/shareholders.
01:55 AM on 05/07/2012
It's a concern when things which ought to be for the public good - IE all our infratsructure - are sold into private hands, far too many of which are foreign!!
Just check out who 'owns' our water; electricity; gas; transport - incl airports etc etc 90%+ now in foreign hands.. It's a total mess and a catastrophe waiting to happen..
07:11 PM on 05/06/2012
Q - If you don't maintain yr car what - generally - follows/happens?
A - It beaks down, generally miles from anywhere and costs a fortune to repair, plus tow fees!!

So, instead of 'farting about' with the nation's infrastructure, put in a planned improvement/maintenance regime.. then stick to it!!!
We need a 21st century transport system in the UK, not one from some third world broke, corrupt place...
03:48 PM on 05/06/2012
I hate to be a nitpicker, but my English teacher wouldn't have taken 'reoccur' from me at age 11.. The word is recur. Occurrence is singular. Recurrence what is happening or will happen AGAIN. More semi-literacy from these alleged journalists.

In the meantime, wasn't the company involved in the Potters Bar disaster nothing to do with Network Rail? I thought that's why the track ownership and maintenance was finally renationalised. Usual thing - privatise until things go wrong & then get muggins taxpayer to bail them out - banks anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fozwords
Abandon hope when you post on here
02:38 PM on 05/06/2012
Its great to hear the union speak out against this, Questions, were not some of the faults in recent accidents caused by the incorrect or shoddy work being carried out or not being completed correctly or carried out by unsupervised team that did not always obey the rules or am I mistaken? If I am correct there follows another question, were the unions as vociferous then as they appear to be now and if union members were guilty in any part did the union defend them or condemn them? Question, is this union statement anything to do with the protection of overtime bonuses and another show of force and a potential threat? These are not statements of fact just simple questions.