Indian Images Uncovered In Shoebox (PICTURES)

PA  |  Posted: 07/05/2012 08:12 Updated: 07/05/2012 08:12   PA

Images Uncovered
Archivists at RCAHMS have already confirmed that some of the images were definitely taken in 1912

A shoe box full of images capturing life in India at least a century ago has been discovered in one of Scotland's national collections.

One shows buildings in the city of Calcutta lit up over the Lal Dighi body of water, commemorating a British royal visit, while another depicts ships arriving at the Chandpal Ghat, the main landing site for visitors to the city along the Hooghly River.

All 178 of the plate-glass negatives were found inside a size-nine Peter Lord shoe box by the Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Scotland (RCAHMS) in Edinburgh.

They are said to have been taken in the country at the time of the British Raj and it is thought the negatives were untouched for almost 100 years.

Archivists at RCAHMS have already confirmed that some of the images were definitely taken in 1912, when King George V and Queen Mary visited Calcutta. It was the only visit by a British monarch to India as Emperor of the subcontinent.

Some of the photographs show the city's buildings lit up at night in tribute to the royal visit.

Little else else is known about the images and the photographer, prompting a search for clues as to his or her identity.

One theory is that the photographer was a British civil servant in Calcutta, or was connected to the jute trade, as many Scots were said to be at the time.

There is a Scottish cemetery in the city that dates back to the time of the British Raj, which has recently been cleaned up and recorded.
RCAHMS hopes that members of the public and photography enthusiasts might be able to shed more light on this discovery.

They also approached John Falconer, curator of photographs at the British Library, who helped to identify some of the locations and remarked on the high quality and beauty of the images, but so far the identity of the photographer remains a mystery.

Claire Sorensen, RCAHMS architectural historian, said: "We don't know for sure how they came to be in our collection because we receive archive material from countless different sources, ranging from the archives kept by architectural practices to generous public donations.

"Sometimes we take in large amounts of material at once, and often documentation for historical deposits does not exist.

"Over time all this new material will be inspected and catalogued as part of our collection - undergoing conservation work where necessary - and then made available to the public.

"It's fantastic that a small shoe box contained such a treasure-trove of photographic imagery, but in some ways it's not unusual.

"Our experience as an archive has shown us that some of the most interesting discoveries can be made in the most unlikely of places."

Loading Slideshow...
FOLLOW UK CULTURE

A shoe box full of images capturing life in India at least a century ago has been discovered in one of Scotland's national collections. One shows buildings in the city of Calcutta lit up over the L...
A shoe box full of images capturing life in India at least a century ago has been discovered in one of Scotland's national collections. One shows buildings in the city of Calcutta lit up over the L...
Filed by Dina Rickman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joan E Freyer
16:49 on 08/05/2012
Everyone should read the Great Divergence on Wikipedia. It is an economic theory that explains why GB was the epicenter of a world wide economic explosion of 25 countries in the West which started in the late 1500s, soared up in the 1600s, exploded in the 1700s, and took over the world in the 1800s. The Great Divergence resulted in colonies. Colonies did not cause the Great Divergence.

Likewise China, India, Japan (until 1850) the Islamic countries, Southern Europe, etc imploded and their economies plunged downward starting in the 1500s, and hitting bottom by the late 1800s. GB was not in India in any major way until mid 1700s but the Great Divergence fueled GB's abililty to take advantage of the imploding economy of older historic giants. But USA and Canda and some North European countries never had major colonies and they followed same pattern of divergence upward as China and India imploded downwards.

Therefore the Great Divergence shows GB and USA and Canada and other North European countries did not cause China and India and Islamic countries to economically implode. They did profit from it. That is a big difference.

In 1702 when Mughal emperor Aurangzeb died India a bullock sold for 500% more than in 1650. that is hyper inflation. Statistics showed India was bankrupt. The Mughals squandered 1/3 of India's GNP on war and luxury making them the biggest historic spenders after the ancient pharoahs!

JEF
22:40 on 07/05/2012
Only 100 years ago ?
Why, it looks like only yesterday !
Just less busy !
18:16 on 07/05/2012
Just look at those photos there are thousands of people, now there are millions.
photo
Reality always bites
Sometimes just a bit peckish
19:29 on 07/05/2012
Remarkable logic.
In 1911 the population of the UK was 36 million- The population of India 252 million.
In 2011 the population of the UK was 63 million- The population of India 1.21 Billion.
Just imagine if the Uk population had exploded at that rate!
20:10 on 07/05/2012
It looks like they got it wrong, most of the 63 million appear be living up here in the northern part of the UK midlands.
12:54 on 07/05/2012
If the photos below are a fair sample of what was in the show box they should have left them there. DULL !.
This comment has been removed.
10:11 on 07/05/2012
I dont know why we say the shame of Empire ..these countries flourished during British rule the slavery and povert exsisted well before we got to these places and well after we left ...
10:27 on 07/05/2012
Indeed scamp but we have a whole bunch of people here in the UK today carrying guilt for slavery and poverty around with them. I feel no guilt what so ever but in truth, I wish we'd never gone near the place.
10:38 on 07/05/2012
AGREE WITH YOU .........IM NOT GUILTY FOR ARAB SLAVE TRADERS IN EAST AND WEST AFRICA ...AS THEY HAVE NO SHAMR TODAY ..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
11:38 on 07/05/2012
...I bet a lot of them wished you never gone near them either.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vividrick
I came, I saw...I had a cup of tea!
11:37 on 07/05/2012
Nevermind 'flourishing', measure how much was looted & how much blood was spilled.
13:30 on 07/05/2012
Many of the Raj's sold out their own people for profit and greed, just like the Tribal Chiefs of Africa sold there own people into slavery. But I guess that relivent piece of impotant information has been excluded from the history books in school rooms in order to paint a picture concerning the slave trade.
This comment has been removed.
This comment has been removed.