Health Secretary Andrew Lansley Attacked Over NHS Reforms Veto

PA/The Huffington Post  |  Posted: 08/05/2012 21:28 Updated: 09/05/2012 09:44

Andrew Lansley
Andrew Lansley has been accused of "burying bad news"

The health secretary Andrew Lansley has been accused of playing "dumb politics" and trying to "bury bad news" for vetoing the publication of a confidential risk assessment of the Government's contentious NHS reforms.

The move to defy an Information Tribunal ruling that the risk register should be released was agreed by the Cabinet on Tuesday morning.

Mr Lansley said he believed in "greater transparency" but that it was also essential to retain "a safe space where officials are able to give ministers full and frank advice in developing policies and programmes".

The November 2010 register set out internal Government assessments of the risks posed by the reforms in the Health and Social Care Act, which became law in March after a tortuous passage through Parliament.

Labour MP John Healey, who along with Information Commissioner Christopher Graham and then the Information Tribunal, called for the register to be published under the Freedom of Information Act, denouinced the health secretary's veto.

Mr Healey said the decision was "poor policy and dumb politics", and would "only fuel doubts and distrust" about the reforms.

The veto is used very rarely - the last Labour government vetoed the release of Cabinet minutes relating to the invasion of Iraq.

"This is a desperate act which will backfire badly. It is an admission of defeat on the legal arguments for public release," Mr Healey, a former shadow health secretary, said.

"It is totally over the top to place NHS changes on the same footing as preparations for the Iraq war.

"There must be some very big risks in the government's NHS reorganisation for ministers to override the law with their political veto.

"Ministers have made the announcement in the very last hour of the last day, trying to bury this bad news on the eve of the Queen's Speech.

"The government has lost twice in law, yet still won't accept that patients and NHS staff have the right to know the risks ministers are running with the biggest ever NHS reorganisation."

After the Cabinet agreed that the "ministerial veto" should be used to prevent publication, Mr Lansley said: "Had we not taken this decision, it is highly likely that future sensitive risk registers would turn into anodyne documents, and be worded quite differently with civil servants worrying about how they sound to the public rather than giving ministers frank policy advice."

He said he was instead publishing a document setting out "key information" from the register but protecting its "language and form".

"This is not a step I have taken lightly. I am a firm believer in greater transparency and this government and this department have done far more than our predecessors in publishing information about the performance and results of our policies.

"But there also needs to be safe space where officials are able to give ministers full and frank advice in developing policies and programmes.

"The Freedom of Information Act always contemplated such a 'safe space' and I believe effective government requires it.

"That is why Cabinet has today decided to veto the release of the department's transition risk register."

Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham also criticised the move, saying: "This disgraceful decision is a cover-up of epic proportions.

"David Cameron is desperate to keep the NHS risk register secret because he knows that, if people could see the scale of the risks he is taking with the NHS, they would not forgive him."

A draft risk register leaked in March showed that ministers were warned of the risk that the reforms could lead to a loss of financial control, reduced productivity and emergencies being less well managed.

That document was produced on 28 September 2010, and it is not known what changes were made before the completion of the transition risk register on 10 November.

The Campaign for Freedom of Information said: "We think the government should appeal against decisions that it dislikes, not veto them.

"The tribunal found that disclosing the register would have helped the public understand the risks and judge whether the government had properly addressed them.

"The government has turned that on its head. It has now published a detailed account of the action it has taken to address possible risks, but refused to say what those risks are.

"That means the public still can't judge."

Dr Peter Carter, chief executive and general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, said: "Despite overwhelming opposition, the government is undertaking the most radical restructure of the NHS at the same time as the service faces severe financial challenges.

"We believe it is wrong that yet again the government is refusing to publish, in full, the risks associated with these reforms.

"We are on record as agreeing with the Information Commissioner ruling that there was a strong public interest in the publication of the register and that it should be published as soon as possible.

"Today's decision is astonishing and means that the public are only being presented with a partial picture of the NHS reforms."

Loading Slideshow...
  • Female protestors display the colors of various flags painted on their hands during a demonstration demanding the trial of former President Ali Abdullah Saleh in Sanaa, Yemen, Tuesday, May 8, 2012. (AP Photo/Hani Mohammed)

  • Actors, from left, Josh Brolin, Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones arrive for the Japan premiere of their film " Men in Black III " in Tokyo, Tuesday, May 8, 2012. (AP Photo/Koji Sasahara)

  • Rea Inu Bake, from the Indian tribe Hunikui, takes part in a protest against slave labor outside the Chamber of Deputies in Brasilia, Brazil, Tuesday, May 8, 2012. Brazil's lower house is expected to vote on a constitutional amendment that would punish landholders found to be using slave labor. The proposed bill would allow the government to confiscate all property of those found to be using slave labor, among other penalties. (AP Photo/Eraldo Peres)

  • Ricky Crompton, from stunt bike team the Riderz, does a jump at St Bernard's Primary in Glasgow, during a photocall to remind drivers across Scotland to look out for children. Picture date: Tuesday May 8, 2012. As children get ready to start taking their bikes to school over the summer months, Mr Beaumont visited pupils at St Bernard's primary school in Glasgow to launch the "Give Me Cycle Space" safety campaign. See PA story SCOTLAND Cycling. Photo credit should read: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire

  • New Jersey Devils' Dainius Zubrus, front, of Lithuania, checks Philadelphia Flyers' Erik Gustafsson, of Sweden, into the boards during the first period of Game 5 of a second-round NHL hockey Stanley Cup playoff series, Tuesday, May 8, 2012, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

  • US Serena Williams falls during her tennis match of the Madrid Masters Russian Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova on May 8, 2012 at the Magic Box (Caja Magica) sports complex in Madrid. Williams won 6-2, 6-1. AFP PHOTO/JAVIER SORIANO (Photo credit should read JAVIER SORIANO/AFP/GettyImages)

  • A jetliner flies over the Mike and Arline Walter Pyramid as it approaches landing during the NORCECA volleybal tournament on May 08, 2012 in Long Beach, California. AFP PHOTO/JOE KLAMAR (Photo credit should read JOE KLAMAR/AFP/GettyImages)

  • The sun reflects off a residential building, early in Hong Kong on May 9, 2012. Financial pressure, career-driven mentalities and limited space are seen as key drivers of a fertility rate in Hong Kong that is one of the lowest in the world by some measures, with an average 1.04 births per woman according to the World Bank. AFP PHOTO / Antony DICKSON (Photo credit should read ANTONY DICKSON/AFP/GettyImages)

  • A picture taken on May 8, 2012 shows a detail of the installation entitled Photo-souvenir 'Excentrique(s), travail in situ' by French artist Daniel Buren during the Monumenta 2012 event at the Grand Palais in Paris.The event runs until June 21. AFP PHOTO FRANCOIS GUILLOT (Photo credit should read FRANCOIS GUILLOT/AFP/GettyImages)

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

The health secretary Andrew Lansley has been accused of playing "dumb politics" and trying to "bury bad news" for vetoing the publication of a confidential risk assessment of the Government's contenti...
The health secretary Andrew Lansley has been accused of playing "dumb politics" and trying to "bury bad news" for vetoing the publication of a confidential risk assessment of the Government's contenti...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:10 PM on 05/14/2012
i hear landsbury,i hear the nurses,i know who i believe,and it s not the millionaire suit.
10:21 AM on 05/09/2012
Are you listening Cameron & Clegg? Are you in touch with the British public over this sensitive issue of the NHS reform that did not appear in either of your manifestos? I think not.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
10:07 AM on 05/09/2012
The way we treat pensioners in this country is a national disgrace. Hundreds died of starvation and neglect at NHS Staffs and the bad press continues with the bad record of care homes. Staff bully and beat frail pensioners who have spent their lives raising families, working hard and paying taxes.

They also need to get a grip on consultants who only work from 9-5. The NHS should be a 24 hour operation, 365 days a year. Gordon Brown gave them lots of money for doing less and it is about time that this was sorted out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whapgra
04:00 PM on 05/09/2012
A 100% inacurate comment and and not thought out.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Mickey Mouse 1
There are no lies or deceit on a chess board.
04:26 PM on 05/09/2012
Read the Mail 8 May 12: Time to end scandal of 9 to 5 NHS.
09:58 AM on 05/09/2012
Where is that hole in t' bucket when we need it?

Surely there's someone, with a hold on the matter, who has a nice leaky PC.
majdf18148
I have nothing to declare but my curiosity
09:06 AM on 05/09/2012
As a former senior NHS employee I have compiled and used Risk Registers extensively. They detail the worst possible scenarios should something happen or go wrong; along with the various potential repercusions; health wise, financial costs, impacts on patient safety, staffing issues, increased waits for treatment,media impact et al of such an occurrence. Our Risk Registers and Risk Statements were always presented to our NHS Board of Directors in public board meetings as they were deemed not to be of a "private or commercially sensitive nature".These documents can alarm people as they lay down precisely what could go wrong and the inplications of such scenarios happening. They are in effect "Doomsday" documents, worst case scenarios, with each risk being graded on severity, likelihood of occurrence and impact and the necessary "generic costs" to avoid such events happening. Risk Registers are nothing new they are a fall back position, evidence that the plan has been thought through and the risks to the success of that plan identified. Knowing all that I wonder why the Govt is defying the Information Commissioner and refusing to release this document alonside a "readable" explanation of what it is about.There's something strange in the neighbourhood!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NOSHER
07:57 AM on 05/09/2012
he is not interested what his voters want like all of them ,the sooner they are out the better take a look at how the country has voted. like cameron and clegg yesterday they siad nothing is going to change well we all should make them change ,thats the only way
06:14 AM on 05/09/2012
we should not be surprised at all, every other effort to hide the information had failed, the only option left was to veto it, and they did, Lansley and the whole cabinet which includes the lib/dems veto'd it. So there you have it. The whole sordid coalition is one big cover up after another, scandal after scandal and incompetence of the highest degree. To think voters who voted for this crowd of clowns thought that they will get us out of the recession......double dip!!
04:28 AM on 05/09/2012
This man couldn't tell the truth if his life depended on it.
Absolutely outrageous what they are doing to our NHS.
03:51 AM on 05/09/2012
whats the man hiding? he thinks he is above the people who voted him into office! lets hope the people who did vote for him remember this next election.. its time to show theses play boys who is in charge !
07:45 AM on 05/09/2012
Alleycatt, I doubt they will, its only two years since Brown and co left office, people have forgotten the mess they created.
09:43 AM on 05/09/2012
please, the blame labour line is so stale now its starting to smell..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dombeyandson
01:37 AM on 05/09/2012
There is nothing worse than people who are elected MPs to serve the country believeing they have a right to withold information and make decisions effecting us all in the misguided belief ther are acting in our best interests when all along they are acting in their own and for a fwe close friends. Worse we pay these buggers to serve us and not themselves
11:40 PM on 05/08/2012
what else can you expect from the tories
11:35 PM on 05/08/2012
Andrew Lansley even beats Camoron as a the grubbiest MP. Part of his election campaign was funded by the director of a PRIVATE medical care group......and now it just so happens that as health secretary he is opening up the NHS to competition. Seems that Andrew has had his back scratched and is now returning the favour. But at what cost ....he recieved £1,000's in funds from this director and as a repayment he is now going to allow private companies to profit to the tune of billions from the NHS. This is all money which we taxpayers will be stumping up. I wonder if when this hugely unpopular bill is forced through Mr Lansley will get more 'help' with his campaign funds.......Greedy, Grubby man.
10:42 PM on 05/08/2012
Are we surprised? Bury bad news, more lies.How can we go on with this continued covering up and lies? Typical Government lies, I am not surprised as to their deceits ,how much more will we take? I for one are at saturation level and its getting to the point where enough is enough and what do I do next???
10:39 PM on 05/08/2012
If you have nothing to hide then why not publish the register? Some of it is already known. My impression is that it reinforces the view that the NHS is being privatised!
photo
funkydoowopper
Reality is just an inconvenience for the right
10:25 PM on 05/08/2012
Another blow against accountability and the democratic process.