Rebekah Brooks: Personal Attack On Gordon Brown Was 'A Mistake'

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 11/05/2012 13:02 Updated: 11/05/2012 15:19

Rebekah Brooks has admitted it was a mistake for The Sun newspaper to attack Gordon Brown for misspelling a soldier's name in a handwritten note sent to the family.

In January 2009 the tabloid published a picture of a letter in which the-then prime minister referred to the mother of 20-year-old Jamie Janes as "Mrs James".

Giving evidence to the Leveson Inquiry on Friday, the former chief executive of News International said an "incredibly aggressive and angry" Brown had phoned her to complain and that she sympathised with his view.

"It was quite tense," she said. "The tone of it was very aggressive and quite rightly he was hurt at the projection and the headline that had been put on the story.

"I think rightly, in his defence, that he suspected or thought that this may be a way in which The Sun was gong to behave."

Brooks said following the "extraordinarily aggressive" conversation she realised it had been a mistake for the paper to to mount such a personal attack on the prime minister.

READ MORE:

She said Brown was worried the story indicated the tabloid was prepared to pursue further personalised attacks against his character.

"I assured him it wasn't and it was a mistake and the headline was too harsh and this was not the way the paper was going to behave." she said.

The Sun was widely seen to have misjudged its attack on Brown, with many of its readers as well as competitor publications complaining it had gone too far.

Brown has poor eyesight and Lord Mandelson, the then Labour business secretary, attacked the story as in "bad taste" and "crude politicking".

Brooks resigned from News International in 2011 following the fall out from the phone hacking scandal. She told Leveson that while she received "indirect" messages of support from David Cameron and Tony Blair.

However she said she suspected Brown was "probably getting the bunting out" at the news.

Brooks also revealed that The Sun decided to announce its switch of support from Labour to the Tories during Brown's last part conference after he failed to devote enough time to the war in Afghansitan in his speech.

"We felt that was the right timing in order to distance ourselves," she said.

Loading Slideshow...
  • Daniel Maier

  • James Ward

  • Carl Maxim

  • Michael De Vere

  • Alex Andreou

  • PeterJukes

  • Not Rupert Murdoch

  • tom jamieson

  • Chris Coltrane

  • Simon Blackwell

  • The Media Blog

  • Steven Baxter

  • Political Animal

  • The subeditor

  • Simon Harris

  • Celia Graham-Dixon

  • Dave

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

Rebekah Brooks has admitted it was a mistake for The Sun newspaper to attack Gordon Brown for misspelling a soldier's name in a handwritten note sent to the family. In January 2009 the tabloid publ...
Rebekah Brooks has admitted it was a mistake for The Sun newspaper to attack Gordon Brown for misspelling a soldier's name in a handwritten note sent to the family. In January 2009 the tabloid publ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This comment has been removed.
12:31 AM on 05/12/2012
I'm sure Paediatrician from Paulsgrove would agree, Mrs Brooks should be dealt with sympathetically
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mfa11e
Tell the truth ,regardless
03:01 PM on 05/11/2012
Having a child now possibly in the hope that found guilty in a court of law ,she wouldnt be sentenced to any prison time.Bet she will object to the publicity and call for her privacy to be honoured
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
04:02 PM on 05/12/2012
She has been arrested, twice, but so far she has not been charged with anything. You have her pregnant because she anticipates being charged, tried, convicted and up for sentence. I think it a trifle far fetched; this woman has the resources to buy the best lawyers in London, and if she was running short her husband could buy the rest for her.
Never underestimate the sheer power of wealth and influence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
SCOTLAND IS NOT ENGLISH PROPERTY
06:32 PM on 05/12/2012
I thought most prisons had a creche
02:25 PM on 05/11/2012
They are all in it together; so why haven't her accomplices been arrested as well? Are Prime Ministers and former Prime Minister (now a billionaire) above the law?
The voters seem to accept that it is quite normal for the man they voted to be Prime Minister to regularly text someone who has now been arrested for alleged criminal activities.
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
SCOTLAND IS NOT ENGLISH PROPERTY
06:32 PM on 05/12/2012
Dont you mean millionaire???? The net worth of Blair is about £20million
02:08 PM on 05/11/2012
Millions have been lead like sheep by the rag Brookes worked for and the sad thing is many more millions will be dispite this enquiry.
This week it was announced that News Corp priofits had risen, the only way this enquiry can be deemed to worth the money spent on it, is if it brings about greater legislation on the press to report fairly and without bias but not gag, and those that have benifited from unethical reporting be exposed. I doubt though this will happen as every political group needs its propaganda outlet also politicians will still be the puppets of the likes of Murdock, scared of the character assassination of the type dished out to Brown.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
SCOTLAND IS NOT ENGLISH PROPERTY
08:10 PM on 05/11/2012
I have thought about that myself, the weird thing is that there is a very tough situation. Because yes, on one hand there is accountability, but on the other there is a very fine line between regulation and censorship. The biggest problem we have in our media, is too many titles owned by two few companies/people. I think one way of managing this is perhaps to limit the amount of media one single person/company can own. I think there has to be some sort of balance, otherwise we end up slipping into a fox news induced coma like they have in america
08:46 PM on 05/11/2012
Fully agree, when most of the media is owned by one group, news turns to propaganda.
03:37 AM on 05/12/2012
From this American across the pond I like the truth in journalism laws like they have in Canada. Our system relies on the media to keep the electorate informed otherwise you end up with George Bush and 8 years of a fiasco that will take us years to repair. Rupert's yellow journalism is like a cancer on any democracy and even he knows it. His only concern is profits, power and how he can use them to get more. He couldn't care less what his business does to the host country. Most of us wish we had never let him in. Here he needed exceptions to our laws to operate as he does. The Republicans paved the way and he provides a free service as their propaganda arm. It appears that we both have the same problem. News organizations are supposed to report the news in an unbiased manner not create a following of misinformed voters and certainly not have a very strong hand in who governs the country. Rupert has up to now been able to get away with his methods. It is apparent that is long overdue to reverse the consolidation of the news media. It is to vital to our future to rely on the 'good will' of a few proven unscrupulous individuals.
This comment has been removed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:46 PM on 05/11/2012
After all this time, it can be presumed that one can mould the conversation to how you want it perceived. Who can say any different, as it will be their word against the others? It must feel good having all that power and the media on your every spoken word.
01:36 PM on 05/11/2012
Is it just me or is it a more widely held view that Mrs Brooks is only being as honest as she wants to be. This could be of course that she does not want to make any slips which may have a detrimental effect on her statements to the Police on another matter.
02:04 PM on 05/11/2012
Isn't that what everone would do.
02:38 PM on 05/11/2012
Remember she is under oath
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
SCOTLAND IS NOT ENGLISH PROPERTY
09:16 PM on 05/11/2012
I think she is being cryptic, of course she doesn't want to admit anything, but she is not exactly denying anything either is she?
01:27 PM on 05/11/2012
ATTENTION DIVERGE . sleight of hand propaganda news to get you off the real corrupt topics which are the current politicians. good ole boys club,closed to mere plebs so go away and do as you're told. thats a good pleb.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
10:19 PM on 05/12/2012
Go away! You are an embarrassment to all British posters! You have the brain capacity of an amoeba with sociological problems.
12:06 AM on 05/13/2012
struck a nerve did it? you puppeted plebite.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hugh Albert
Moderation in somethings
10:22 AM on 05/13/2012
No, you didn't strike a nerve, you merely made me cringe in embarrassment for you.
There was also the thought that your posting, under the banner of British Patriot, would be seen by folk of other nations. No one would actually believe that you represent anyone but yourself, but some would just love to use it against us.
I haven't used any big words here, but if there are you don't know, buy a dictionary!
01:25 PM on 05/11/2012
what a sly, conniving piece of skin Brooks really is
03:25 PM on 05/11/2012
it hasnt bothered anyone else be fore her, cannot recollect seems to be the most used sentance at this inquirery.News int has a lot of past and present staff with memory problems to put it mildly
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGillLondonUK
SCOTLAND IS NOT ENGLISH PROPERTY
08:13 PM on 05/11/2012
Yes she is, and it seems she is on a long list of people who fit that description. However, despite all the faults of news corp murdoch and the media in general, the general public also have also contributed to this problem, since it is the public who buy these papers. The only way to stop this is to boycott the sun, times, etc. However I remember the wapping strikes in the 80s, and it didnt work then. I remember those "Dont buy New of the world, The Sun, The Times" stickers