Tam Dalyell: 'Abolishing Scottish Parliament Should Be An Option'

The Huffington Post UK  |  By Posted: 14/05/2012 10:58 Updated: 14/05/2012 10:58

Scottish voters should be given the chance to vote on abolishing the Scottish Parliament, according to veteran Labour politician Tam Dalyell.

“I do know I have a minority opinion, and that is that if there is a Scottish Parliament to continue then it will be very difficult to avoid something that is indistinguishable from an independent state" he said.

"I think there should be a way in which those who want the parliament brought to an end can express their opinion"

The Scotsman reports he added: "I think that there are very few politicians who would want it, there are very few journalists who would want it, but I think there are a great many people up and down Scotland [who would]”

Dalyell, who was speaking at the Boswell Book Festival in Ayshire, spent 43 years in Parliament. He is credited with first posing the "West Lothian Question", on whether Scottish MPs should be able to vote on issues that only matter to England.

“The present situation is not stable, and what I am entitled to say is, ‘Yes, I don’t know what will happen, but what I would like to happen is the abolition of the Edinburgh parliament’" he added.

Dalyell also warned that the 'devo-max' option on the ballot would destabilise the British tax system and herald the breaking up of the United Kingdom.

“There is no way in which devo-max, if it’s the break-up of fiscal and monetary powers, can form a stable situation. People will have to make up their minds – do they want to be separate from England or not? In my belief there is a majority of Scottish people who do not want to see separation" he said.

The SNP government, which is in favour of independence, plans to hold a poll on the break up of the United Kingdom before 2015 and has proposed that Scots be asked: "Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?"

FOLLOW UK POLITICS

 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:34 AM on 05/15/2012
Its a simple question to a very complex situation,should you become independant yes or no ?
Total independance would be very good for England,the money saved in public services alone would be so vast,,remember there are more taxpayers in England than in any of the other members in the uk so on that basis alone those in England would welcome the move away from themselves,its all about the money at the end of the day !!!!!!!
photo
tc-byrne
Victoria Concordia Crescit
03:20 PM on 05/14/2012
This is old labour talking, To late the horse as bolted!
01:45 PM on 05/14/2012
Totally agree thses islands are not big enough for 3 separate governents who will have different beliefs and self preservations. The United Kingdom will be much stronger as a whole than 3 minor fractions and who is going to pay for all the added costs associated with 3 separate "palaces" of power - that's right the taxpayer. With the whole country being on the verge of bankruptcy the burden of added unnecessary costs will be unstainable and will brag us down to the third world economy we are rapidily approaching. Time to get everyone one on the same side and put the great back into Great Britain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jfjoubert
Le pire n'est pas toujours certain.
05:23 AM on 05/16/2012
That's a strange type of "team spirit" you express there... shows how flawed the union is to the seperate countries that have been told for generations it was a consensual, egalitarian enterprise. It never was. It was never meant to be. Separate governments wholly responsible to the nations they represent working on equal terms to the benefit of themselves and their neighbours... in fact what the union was supposed to be.... is the only way to go. This is 2012... time to reconsider the union and the only to do that is for its separate governments to take back their independence. Alba gu bràth!
12:38 PM on 05/14/2012
Tam was a very good constituency MP and is a great campaigner for causes he believes in so his latest "contribution" comes as no surprise. He is a Unionist and always will be so I have no problem in him campaigning for retaining the Union. He is, however, completely out of touch with the Scottish people if he thinks there a "great many people" in Scotland who would vote for removing the Scottish Parliament.
Tam is at odds with his own party on this which is not unusual for Tam. Not even the Scottish Tories or their chums are campaigning for the abolition of the Scottish Parliament.
Tam should be content in his retirement and stick to writing. I wholeheartedly recommend his autobiography "The Importance of Being Awkward" which I think gives some perspective on his recent comments.
11:35 AM on 05/14/2012
Well said Tam,it takes a Proper Labour person to see common sense in this daft world,The Scottish people should decide on a staight question,yes or no to independence.No frills or devo-max.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:35 PM on 05/14/2012
If you had taken the time to read the Scottish Government's proposals in full (that means not in the Daily Mail or the Daily Mirror) then you would have been aware by now that the S.G's wish is for a single question. A simple YES/NO question. No frills, no devomax. The Labour Party are slowly catching on to the idea that they are no longer the party that people listen to as they once did. The reason behind that being that the labour party shifted to the right and left the people behind. They (the party) became Tories with red ties.
Time for Tam to go back to sleep again.
01:40 PM on 05/14/2012
We are all aware of the snp stand,and there trickery of words.Do you wont an independent Scotland! Would you like an independent Scotland,Do you want to breakaway from the rest of the UK.What question is the snp pushing on to the Scottish public?As for people listening to Labour,they did'nt do to bad in the Scottish local elections,As the snp had them dead and buried,and going to walk all over Glasgow and the rest of SCOTLAND.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gunderan
Who let the Libertarians out without supervision?
05:10 PM on 05/14/2012
Its simple for Scotland,become independant set up new laws governing tax and secrecy lawa,become an offshore banking paradise.Scotland may not have the weather of the Cayman Islands but its golf courses are better lol.
If Scotland did this it would become an overnight success and with its other things like education,tourism oil and whisky would be a paradise.
06:48 AM on 05/15/2012
I´m sorry, I´m a little confused regarding your opinion on a possible Devo-Max question. You responded to my post when I quoted former Scottish chairman Bob Thomson stating he, and many other Labour and trade union members, would vote for Scottish independence if there was no Devo-Max question.

Here is what your response to me said,"Labour put foward the devo-max question,which i think is a good way to go forward,". So you said Devo-max was a good way to move forward.

Now you´re saying there should be "No frills or devo-max".

I presumed you would vote for this option. Or am I mistaken? It would be interesting to know how you will vote because there is a distinct lack of positive aspects to maintaining the union as it currently is. How will you vote, presuming you are eligible to vote?
09:56 AM on 05/15/2012
Yes i did say Labour put forward the devo-max question,and i said Bob Thomson dont speak for Labour any more,or the vast majority of Scottish people,The same with the snp, they do not speak for the vast majority of Scots either, when it comes to independence.Let me ask you one question.What problems will be solved by being independent?