OCR Examiners Failed To Add Up Marks Properly

PA  |  Posted: Updated: 17/05/2012 21:00   PA

Ocr Blunders

An exam board apologised for marking errors that could have affected GCSE and A-level grades after a whistleblower was suspended amid claims bosses told him not to inform schools.

In the wake of his claims, regulator Ofqual said it could not be certain that all pupils were yet in possession of the grades they deserved.

Channel 4 News said David Leitch, a senior supervisor at OCR, found wrongly calculated final scores in a hundred papers from last summer that schools had referred for checking.

A wider search found "hundreds more" mistakes by the same markers but Leitch claims he was instructed to inform only schools which had requested paid-for remarking, the programme said.

Dissatisfied with a review ordered by regulator Ofqual, C4 News reported, he last week emailed 30 schools directly to alert them to errors and has now been suspended by OCR pending a full inquiry.

Ofqual director of regulation Fiona Pethick said questions remained over the accuracy of marks.

Asked if she could be personally sure that no pupil still had a lower grade than they should, potentially affecting a university place, she told the programme: "I'm not satisfied yet.

"That's why we will be continuing to look into this matter and if we find OCR to be negligent we will take action."

A spokesman for the regulator added: "When this issue first arose, last year, we asked the exam board to carry out extended checks, identify the weaknesses in its processes and to put these right in time for the January exams. It appears that new evidence may have come to light."

OCR confirmed that Leitch had been suspended while it investigated.

Qualifications director Clara Kenyon said: "Mistakes can occur in a system where examiners mark using pen and paper on hard copy scripts. We apologise unreservedly to affected schools, students and their parents. This should never have happened."

A "formal and extensive investigation" of the initial problem had found 16 cases where pupils had received a lower grade than they should, she said - eight AS-levels, two A-levels and six GCSEs.

It resulted in the termination of four examiners' contracts and 78 others out of 13,000 - "almost all" teachers and ex-teachers with relevant degrees - being ordered to improve their performance.

But she insisted OCR had not been made aware of the existence of further errors.

"We were not told of the existence of these additional scripts with mistakes on them until schools contacted us," she said.

"This is of course a concern and we are processing them in the usual way and will make grade changes, if required, and inform schools."

The board was confident new safeguards would provide "a high level of clerical accuracy" in future, she said, pointing out that marks for three in four papers were calculated electronically.

All papers are due to be handled that way by 2014.

"Students taking exams both in the spring and this summer can be assured that mistakes of any sort will not be tolerated and we have taken the necessary measures to guard against them," she said.

FOLLOW UK EDUCATION

Filed by Lucy Sherriff  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 10
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:14 PM on 05/18/2012
I used to mark for OCR. They allowed you to pay another person to add up marks or check your addition. This could be any other person. No checks were made on the suitability or qualifications of the other person.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
05:53 AM on 05/18/2012
What a disaster. The education system is a joke and the examiners are corrupt.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
10:35 PM on 05/18/2012
A bit of an overreaction, Vapula. Calm down...
12:41 AM on 05/18/2012
Oversight with integrity is at the heart of the rule of law and democracy. Such failures should lead to the immediate dismissal of all persons who colluded or connived at concealment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
werba
11:26 PM on 05/17/2012
The richest, most side-splittingly hilarious statement made in this piece, is that examiners will commit errors - by implication ONLY - when 'they use pen and paper on hard copy scripts.' This is so mendacious that it takes my breath away. Far, far more errors are made under the wretched, stupid, insulting 'Online marking system' than ever occurred when we marked properly - that is, we actually saw scripts and cared about the students.

Actually, it would not surprise me at all if this were merely a ploy to discredit proper, ie 'hard copy' marking, since the exam boards are struggling with our hatred of the computer model.
photo
mmartini54
Roll on 2015!
09:32 PM on 05/17/2012
Hahaha! This is what you get when you let a private company loose in the education sector!

Get ready for more sub standard performance, Britain! Thanks to the brainless wonders at ConDem house, private industry is crawling all over the educational establishment now!!

LOL!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
werba
11:21 PM on 05/17/2012
It's extraordinary how some will always blame the private sector! As a Senior Examiner myself - not this board - I can tell you with 100% certainty that the mistakes reported have nothing whatsoever to do with privatization! They stem from the fact that examiners are paid sweat shop rates for what is a very demanding job, they have a very short time to complete it, and mistakes will be made - as indeed they are in all areas of life.

By the way - I assume you do know - OCR = Oxford and Cambridge?
This comment has been removed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Laatab
All The Worlds A Stage
07:42 AM on 05/18/2012
"They stem from the fact that examiners are paid sweat shop rates for what is a very demanding job, they have a very short time to complete it, and mistakes will be made - as indeed they are in all areas of life."

So these private companies will pay the examiners more and provide better conditions then?