Electricity Giant EDF In Talks To Extend Life Of Nuclear Power Stations

PA/The Huffington Post UK  |  Posted: Updated: 22/05/2012 10:14

Edf
Protesters at Hinkley Power Station In 2011

Electricity giant EDF is in talks with the nuclear regulator about extending the life of its power stations.

The firm, which runs eight nuclear power stations in the UK, is working with the Office for Nuclear Regulation regarding the "the extension of the operational lifetime of their existing fleet of nuclear power reactors", the ONR said.

The reactors are due to start decommissioning in 2016, with seven of the eight ceasing generation by 2023, according to the EDF website. The company is due to make a final investment decision on the UK's first two new nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point, Somerset, at the end of 2012.

Faced with this and other concerns, the Government unveiled plans in the Queen's Speech earlier this month for an overhaul of the electricity market to drive massive investment in low carbon power and bridge the looming energy gap.

EDF told the Guardian that it remained committed to building new nuclear reactors, with a spokesman saying: "Extending the lives of our nuclear power stations makes absolute sense in terms of filling a short-term energy need while the country rightly continues towards aggressive decarbonisation targets."

He added: "Life extension helps with the very short-term risk but doesn't change the need or urgency of the new nuclear programme in the longer term.

"The fundamental need for new capacity remains: the inability of old coal to meet tighter emissions limits being the foremost factor."

EDF runs nuclear reactors at Dungeness in Kent, Hartlepool in the North East, Sizewell in Suffolk, Hinkley Point in Somerset, two at Heysham in Lancashire and two in Scotland, at Torness, near Dunbar in East Lothian and Hunterston, near Largs in Ayreshire.

Only Sizewell is currently due to continue in use after 2023 according to the firm's website.

Whether reactors continue to operate is a commercial decision for the companies which run them, but they have to meet the safety standards set by the ONR. The cost of meeting these standards can rise as the infrastructure gets older. The ONR said it is usual for safety to be reviewed every 10 years.

"ONR staff are engaged with EdF Energy Nuclear Generation Ltd on their 'Lifetime Management Programme' for the extension of the operational lifetime of their existing fleet of nuclear power reactors," a spokeswoman for the regulator said.

"This has included reviews of the plants to establish where improvements could be made in monitoring plant and material performance and identifying where further work is necessary on the impact of ageing.

"ONR is content for the plants to continue to operate subject to satisfactory PSRs (Periodic Safety Reviews) being carried out; and the results from routine maintenance, inspection and testing continue to support the agreed plant safety case."

The Government's plans for a nuclear-power renaissance were thrown into disarray in March when two of the "big six" energy giants pulled out of a venture to build new reactors.

Greenpeace's executive director John Sauven warned of a "looming energy ominshambles", telling The Guardian: "The energy bill could be a huge opportunity to get energy bills and carbon emissions under control, and to bring security to our power supplies. But ministers seem hell-bent on scuppering all of these aims by encouraging a big increase in our dependence on burning expensive gas to generate electricity."

The decision by RWE npower and E.ON not to go ahead with developing nuclear power plants at Wylfa in north Wales and Oldbury-on-Severn, Gloucestershire, threatened the creation of thousands of jobs and undermined UK energy policy, it was warned at the time.

The two German-owned companies said they were looking for a new owner for their venture Horizon Nuclear Power in the light of financial constraints.

Loading Slideshow...
  • he engines of the SpaceX Falcon 9 light but fail to launch from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on May 19, 2012 in Titusville, Florida. The launch in the early hours of Saturday morning would have made SpaceX the first commercial company to send a spacecraft to the International Space Station. (Photo by Roberto Gonzalez/Getty Images)

  • Chelsea Pensioners open the Westland Magical Tower Garden, a 24 meter high seven-tiered garden display, at the RHS Chelsea Flower Show, in Chelsea, west London.(PA)

  • will.i.am passes the Olympic Flame to torchbearer Emma Folwer in Taunton, Somerset.(PA)

  • The Prince of Wales watches as the Duchess of Cornwall tastes a sponge cake at the St-Francis School in Saint John eastern Canada, on the second day of a four day Diamond Jubilee tour of the north American country.(PA)

  • Visitors wait in front of the entrance of the Tokyo Skytree in Tokyo, Tuesday, May 22, 2012. The world's tallest tower and Japan's biggest new landmark opened to the public on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Itsuo Inouye)

  • Workers put finishing touches on the carving wax featuring Lord Buddha during the preparation to celebrate the 2,600 years of Buddhism in Bangkok, Thailand Tuesday, May 22, 2012. (AP Photo/Apichart Weerawong)

  • An aerial view of the Mosquitia region near the remote community of Ahuas, Honduras, Monday, May 21, 2012. On Friday May 11, a joint Honduran-U.S. drug raid, on a helicopter mission with advisers from the DEA, appears to have mistakenly targeted civilians in the remote jungle area, killing four riverboat passengers and injuring four others. Later, according to villagers, Honduran police narcotics forces and men speaking English spent hours searching the small town of Ahuas for a suspected drug trafficker.(AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd)

  • Niagara Falls emergency officials rescue a man who plunged over Niagara Falls and survived in an apparent suicide attempt, Monday, May 21, 2012. The man is only the third person known to have gone over without a safety device and live. A waiting helicopter flew him to Hamilton General Hospital, where a spokeswoman says he has critical but non-life-threatening injuries. (AP Photo/Harry Rossetani)

  • An Iraqi man rides his donkey cart in a Baghdad street, in a yellow haze from a heavy dust storm which shut the capital's airport on May 22, 2012. AFP PHOTO/SABAH ARAR (Photo credit should read SABAH ARAR/AFP/GettyImages)

FOLLOW UK

 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:03 PM on 06/23/2012
Let us give a small cheer for the possible Severn tidal barrage. I stood on the Rance barrage 40 years ago as it generated max power at the middle of the ebb tide. It trembled beneath my feet, the megawatts were made, absolutely .........incredible.

Come on you green science people. Let's be having you! But only for projects that work and not Don Quixote windmills.
03:15 PM on 05/22/2012
We would all like to see our energy generation coming from sustaneable sources but it is an impossible dream in Britain.
The naive idea that all we have to do is spend billions on thousands of windmills that will decay over the next 25 years is already showing a lot of cracks. Havng said that, nuclear technology has not exactly come a long way in 50 years but n this crowded island, with the post oil era looming, doing nothing is not an option.
12:20 PM on 05/22/2012
Dangerous - the out of date plant and equipment at Fukashima were a major contributor to the problems. There is a very good reason that plants of this nature have a defined life!
02:26 PM on 05/22/2012
The problem at Fukashima cannot be solved - it gets worse everyday.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beenzrgud
Can't say what I'd like to here.
11:43 AM on 05/22/2012
If the governments of the western powers were serious about solving the issue of energy then they would be pouring far more resources into fusion research and they would have been doing it years ago.
11:01 AM on 05/22/2012
Now that all the utilities including water are in foreign hands we are at their mercy. EDF and Co holding out for higher subsidies until the Gvt crack. You reap what you sow
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Saint wright
Dyslexic old chippy
09:15 AM on 05/22/2012
how is it we were first to crack the atom, build nuclear power stations, but now need foriegn firms to build these and even the bloody useless wind turbines?
08:34 AM on 05/22/2012
I think it's time people in the UK woke up and realised that we live on a very small island with very finite natural resources, so we have two choices. We can reopen the coal mines and build coal fired power stations, build more oil fired power stations and put ourselves at the mercy of the oil producers, and accept the ever increasing cost of our electricity. Alternatively go for wind or wave power which means covering the country and coastline with windmills and wiggly things.

Or we can go for nuclear power which will give us long term independence from oil/coal producers, won't ruin the countryside. (You'll notice that none of the anti nuclear people want's a windmill near their house) and there is no reason why as oil and gas run out we cant go over to heating our houses, cooking, and running our cars on cheaply produced electricity.

One last point, which is more a question really. Getting rid of nuclear waste. Why cant we just send it into space. Not into orbit, but fire it towards the sun?

It certainly won't hurt the sun, and it definitely won't come back that's for sure.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Drg40
Representative Democracy is all we have.
08:50 AM on 05/22/2012
Just a small point. Many of the coal mines can't be reopened. In order to comply with he policy of the destruction of anywhere that had, in the past, supported Labour, the evil crone had many pits permanently sealed and ensured that routine maintenance was not carried out on thers, so they are irrecoverably flooded.

That's the Tory way.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
10:29 AM on 05/22/2012
Darn.... you beat me to it again...

...and even if we could open the coal mines, can you envisage many in the text-zombie, iPhone-addicted generation actually working down the mines...

No, me neither...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Patrick Sullivan
In Lak`ech, (Mayan) “I am another yourself.”
07:42 PM on 05/22/2012
Your "into the sun with nuclear waste" is something i myself thought of years ago. It would be prohibitively expensive. The very process would use more power than is being generated by everything else in existence using energy/power. (two wrongs don't make a right! lol)

What we really need is economic incentives to people, worldwide, to reduce the number of children, and conversely, economic pain to those who--like Octomom--bear many children. In other words, there are too many humans for us to maintain a sustainable planet.

Even if we had all the non polluting free energy we could use, we still live on this planet in a non sustainable way, just by the sheer number of people and by the loss of wildlife habitats and oxygen generating rain forests

Geo-thermal and usrr-friendly mass transit could possibly help.

Ultimately, it is the world's major religions that are the problem. In their zeal to make us better people, NONE of them factor in or include all other lifeforms that we share our Earth with.

Not to worry though; we all get to go to heaven even if it means destroying the basic underpinnings keeping us viable. Alas
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thomas Patrick Sullivan
In Lak`ech, (Mayan) “I am another yourself.”
08:03 AM on 05/22/2012
How much do you want to bet that “….filling a term energy need….” Was factored in all the way back to when they first built their nuclear power stations? Make sure EDF executives live right near these plants so they can bravely sacrifice their lives when, not if, when a leak or melt-down happens.

Will EDF CEO’s get millions in bonuses if they can snag the British to this foolhardy dangerous stunt? I say we have Rupert Murdoch newspapers weigh in his position. lol
07:48 AM on 05/22/2012
We need more nuclear power, and to preserve what we have as long as possible. It's the only energy that is both safe and clean, as well as being affordable. Nuclear protesters need to understand that they have to face energy bills three and four times today's levels together with travel costs spiralling upwards if they obstruct the building of new nuclear and the preservation of that which we already have.
KenInd
We too shall get through this.....
08:14 AM on 05/22/2012
Tree huggers think the world can exist 'off the grid'. I am all for alternatives that work, but as yet we have not found any that produce the electricity we need at a price we can afford. We had twenty years since nuclear was taken off the table as an option to find a viable alternative; as yet we have not. Even if one is one the horizon, we will need nuclear - or more coal, oil and gas - to sustain our energy requirements until those innovations become viable. Nuclear is the only option that will help reduce carbon emissions. You cannot have it both ways.
09:49 AM on 05/22/2012
Absolutely right, Windmills and solar panels can never supply the power needs of this country. Oli and coalo produce carbons that threaten the eco system, therefore safe nuclear plants are the answer. I know people will say "what about the waste" it will last for a 1000 years - no, have a look at the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 65 years after the atomic bomb.
photo
rabidrightwatch
Green lefty & active environmentalist
10:32 AM on 05/22/2012
This tree-hugger is off-grid and has been for some years... so your next question is..??

Seriously, alternative energy cannot completely replace conventional energy sources, but it can and will play an increasing role in the mix of sources we will need in the future...

Nuclear is not the only option - it is one option, I grant you, but it isn't the only option...