Not worth the investigation unless the weight of the contents of the bag was less than that specified on the bag. As with everything - you have the choice, if you dont like it, dont buy them, but in the mean time just think of the spike in sales as masses of people rush out to buy a packet to see what the fuss it about. Cant see walkers losing any sleep over it

They are doing nothing wrong, aslong as the weight of crisps inside is the same as advertised on outside!

we have govts and greedy banks and oil companies ripping us off left, right and centre and nobody seem to care.a small serving of crisps sends us into a frenzy.beam me up scotty,the world has gone bonkers

this is all a joke really as many of the companys claim that such reductions in weights and measures are to try and help combat obesity in the population while they have reduced the weights and sizes of certain products they have failed to reduce the prices by the same amount and it does not help combat obesity at all as those who are obese and trully the fat and greedy ones where over eating is the major cause of there obesity such measures make no diffrence too them at all as they just buy two or more or double up upon what they would normally buy to make sure that there stomache is filled this then results in them often eating two or more times what they would of done under the old weights and measures if they had been left alone as previously one would of been sufficent to fill them now it is not the case so they buy two or more which then results in the total amount they eat being more than a single old sized item in any case I think they should leave alone and go back to the original seizes and weights and measures that they originally started at when they first made any product and let the public make up there own minds as to how much or little they eat as they used to do and still do in many ways and stop the companys profiteering

I'm allergic to whatever is in them and as they refuse to reveal the ingredients, it will remain one of life's mysteries to add to the mystery of why so few in a packet.

Seabrook any day! Less air made locally so less gas unlike Walkers - always thin in every bag!!

A No No in my shopping!

Only time we buy walkers is if they are on offer at the shop. if they aren't on offer, I have the own brand.

i have found in the past since they went to foil packs, I have found walkers to be greasier than other crisps.

Easy,don't buy walkers crisps, It's a rip off and if people do'n buy them ,profits go down and then maybe a rethink, but if people continue to buy a half handful of chips thn that is what they deserve

anybody that bothers to count how many crisps there are in a bag deserves to be slapped with a wet flannel.

As long as the bag weighs what it says, it does not matter how many crisps there are in the bag, surely that is obvious. 11, 2 or 13 must weigh the advertised Gramms, only if not would it be wrong to only have so few in the packet. I have had them and agree there are only approx 12 crisps....

Tens of thousands of people are starving to death in the world, and some people are grumbling about how many crisps there are in a pack.

PEOPLE, GET REAL AND LOOK AROUND YOU.

No problem to me, I don't eat crisps.

I don't get it, less crisps in packets, smaller mars bars, huge fat Brits- where do they get it all from?